MaplePrimes - Maple 16 Posts and Questions
http://www.mapleprimes.com/products/Maple/Maple 16
en-us2015 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.Maplesoft Document SystemSun, 25 Jan 2015 20:20:06 GMTSun, 25 Jan 2015 20:20:06 GMTMaple 16 Questions and Posts on MaplePrimeshttp://www.mapleprimes.com/images/mapleprimeswhite.jpgMaplePrimes - Maple 16 Posts and Questions
http://www.mapleprimes.com/products/Maple/Maple 16
Automatic switch to 2-d mode
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/203292-Automatic-Switch-To-2d-Mode?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>Hello, my problem is that I've changed in tools maple default mode to "Maple input" from "2-d" I've aplied it globbaly and it doesnt'work. Still when type Enter it switch automatically to 2-d Math, and I have to change it by Ctrl-M to 1-d. Any ideas how to solve it? I want 2-d just to output.</p><p>Hello, my problem is that I've changed in tools maple default mode to "Maple input" from "2-d" I've aplied it globbaly and it doesnt'work. Still when type Enter it switch automatically to 2-d Math, and I have to change it by Ctrl-M to 1-d. Any ideas how to solve it? I want 2-d just to output.</p>203292Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:48:24 Zrobiprorobiprogenerate binary sequence
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/203005-Generate-Binary-Sequence?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>Hey all, I am new to the maple software. </p>
<p>I have a question to create a binary sequence -consisting of m zeroes and n ones. <span> For example, m=n=2. then the number of combinations of the binary sequence is 6,nchoosek(4,2). And the combinations could be {1,1,0,0}, {0,0,1,1}</span></p>
<p><span>{1,0,1,0} ,{0,1,0,1},{0,1,1,0} and {1,0,0,1}. How do I program the maple code ,that could print out all the combinations above?</span></p><p>Hey all, I am new to the maple software. </p>
<p>I have a question to create a binary sequence -consisting of m zeroes and n ones. <span> For example, m=n=2. then the number of combinations of the binary sequence is 6,nchoosek(4,2). And the combinations could be {1,1,0,0}, {0,0,1,1}</span></p>
<p><span>{1,0,1,0} ,{0,1,0,1},{0,1,1,0} and {1,0,0,1}. How do I program the maple code ,that could print out all the combinations above?</span></p>203005Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:06:44 ZRocketRocketPlotting a big expression, results in an empty graph
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202898-Plotting-A-Big-Expression-Results-In?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>Hi all</p>
<p>I'm having a hard time, making Maple plot a pretty huge expression in my project.</p>
<p>I have solved a differential equation with initial conditions with method=laplace. The differential equation contains a fourier serie equation, so the more accurate i want the equation to be, the larger the differential equation will be.</p>
<p>Maple solves the equation just fine, and i can plot the solution with 2-4 fourier parts, but when i go higher as i need, the graph ends up empty?</p>
<p>with 20 parts i get the following equation: </p>
<p>0.*sin(52.88*t)+0.*cos(74.03*t)-0.*sin(74.03*t)-0.*cos(52.88*t)+0.*cos(200.95*t)-0.*sin(200.95*t)+0.*cos(158.65*t)-5.55*10^(-8)*sin(105.76*t)-0.*sin(116.34*t)+0.*cos(31.73*t)-.45*sin(10.58*t)+1.02*cos(10.58*t)+0.*sin(95.19*t)+0.*cos(116.34*t)+0.*sin(179.80*t)-0.*cos(179.80*t)+0.*sin(137.49*t)-0.*sin(31.73*t)-0.*cos(95.19*t)+5.53*10^(-993)*(-1.13*10^992*cos(10.61*t)+8.14*10^991*sin(10.61*t))*exp(-0.7e-1*t)+4.23*10^(-7)*cos(211.53*t)-6.69*10^(-7)*cos(63.46*t)-6.11*10^(-7)*cos(105.76*t)+5.79*10^(-7)*cos(126.92*t)+6.67*10^(-8)*sin(42.31*t)-5.88*10^(-8)*sin(148.07*t)+5.88*10^(-8)*sin(211.53*t)+7.09*10^(-7)*cos(42.31*t)+5.45*10^(-8)*sin(84.61*t)+6.40*10^(-7)*cos(84.61*t)+5.72*10^(-8)*sin(126.92*t)-9.01*10^(-7)*cos(21.15*t)+5.97*10^(-8)*sin(169.22*t)+5.06*10^(-7)*cos(169.22*t)-5.98*10^(-8)*sin(190.38*t)-4.65*10^(-7)*cos(190.38*t)-5.44*10^(-7)*cos(148.07*t)-1.33*10^(-7)*sin(21.15*t)-5.61*10^(-8)*sin(63.46*t)-0.*cos(137.49*t)-0.*sin(158.65*t)<br><br></p>
<p>if i plot that expression, the graph ends up empty?</p>
<p>I did also try to solve the equation numerical to plot it with odeplot, but when i try to solve it without the laplace method i get this error message:<br>"Error, (in dsolve) found the following equations not depending on the unknows of the input system:"</p>
<p>The differential equation is:</p>
<p>ode:=diff(Theta(t), t, t)+2*Zeta*omega[balanceue]*(diff(Theta(t), t))+omega[balanceue]^2*Theta(t) = M[p]/m[balanceue]</p>
<p>and the initial conditions:</p>
<p>ICS := Theta(0) = (1/8)*Pi, (D(Theta))(0) = 0;<br><br></p>
<p>when i do:</p>
<p>dsolve({ICS, ode}, Theta(t), method = laplace) it solves just fine.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>but when i try with:</p>
<p>dsolve({ICS, ode}, Theta(t))</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>dsolve({ICS, ode}, Theta(t),numeric)</p>
<p>I get the message: </p>
<p>Error, (in dsolve) found the following equations not depending on the unknowns of the input system: {Theta(0) = (1/8)*Pi, (D(Theta))(0) = 0}</p>
<p>It doesnt seem logical at all, is it a bug? Or can anybody help me with this problem?</p>
<p><br>Regards</p>
<p>Nicolai</p><p>Hi all</p>
<p>I'm having a hard time, making Maple plot a pretty huge expression in my project.</p>
<p>I have solved a differential equation with initial conditions with method=laplace. The differential equation contains a fourier serie equation, so the more accurate i want the equation to be, the larger the differential equation will be.</p>
<p>Maple solves the equation just fine, and i can plot the solution with 2-4 fourier parts, but when i go higher as i need, the graph ends up empty?</p>
<p>with 20 parts i get the following equation: </p>
<p>0.*sin(52.88*t)+0.*cos(74.03*t)-0.*sin(74.03*t)-0.*cos(52.88*t)+0.*cos(200.95*t)-0.*sin(200.95*t)+0.*cos(158.65*t)-5.55*10^(-8)*sin(105.76*t)-0.*sin(116.34*t)+0.*cos(31.73*t)-.45*sin(10.58*t)+1.02*cos(10.58*t)+0.*sin(95.19*t)+0.*cos(116.34*t)+0.*sin(179.80*t)-0.*cos(179.80*t)+0.*sin(137.49*t)-0.*sin(31.73*t)-0.*cos(95.19*t)+5.53*10^(-993)*(-1.13*10^992*cos(10.61*t)+8.14*10^991*sin(10.61*t))*exp(-0.7e-1*t)+4.23*10^(-7)*cos(211.53*t)-6.69*10^(-7)*cos(63.46*t)-6.11*10^(-7)*cos(105.76*t)+5.79*10^(-7)*cos(126.92*t)+6.67*10^(-8)*sin(42.31*t)-5.88*10^(-8)*sin(148.07*t)+5.88*10^(-8)*sin(211.53*t)+7.09*10^(-7)*cos(42.31*t)+5.45*10^(-8)*sin(84.61*t)+6.40*10^(-7)*cos(84.61*t)+5.72*10^(-8)*sin(126.92*t)-9.01*10^(-7)*cos(21.15*t)+5.97*10^(-8)*sin(169.22*t)+5.06*10^(-7)*cos(169.22*t)-5.98*10^(-8)*sin(190.38*t)-4.65*10^(-7)*cos(190.38*t)-5.44*10^(-7)*cos(148.07*t)-1.33*10^(-7)*sin(21.15*t)-5.61*10^(-8)*sin(63.46*t)-0.*cos(137.49*t)-0.*sin(158.65*t)<br /><br /></p>
<p>if i plot that expression, the graph ends up empty?</p>
<p>I did also try to solve the equation numerical to plot it with odeplot, but when i try to solve it without the laplace method i get this error message:<br />"Error, (in dsolve) found the following equations not depending on the unknows of the input system:"</p>
<p>The differential equation is:</p>
<p>ode:=diff(Theta(t), t, t)+2*Zeta*omega[balanceue]*(diff(Theta(t), t))+omega[balanceue]^2*Theta(t) = M[p]/m[balanceue]</p>
<p>and the initial conditions:</p>
<p>ICS := Theta(0) = (1/8)*Pi, (D(Theta))(0) = 0;<br /><br /></p>
<p>when i do:</p>
<p>dsolve({ICS, ode}, Theta(t), method = laplace) it solves just fine.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>but when i try with:</p>
<p>dsolve({ICS, ode}, Theta(t))</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>dsolve({ICS, ode}, Theta(t),numeric)</p>
<p>I get the message: </p>
<p>Error, (in dsolve) found the following equations not depending on the unknowns of the input system: {Theta(0) = (1/8)*Pi, (D(Theta))(0) = 0}</p>
<p>It doesnt seem logical at all, is it a bug? Or can anybody help me with this problem?</p>
<p><br />Regards</p>
<p>Nicolai</p>202898Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:38:11 Z9colai9colaifsolve and solve not working
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202884-Fsolve-And-Solve-Not-Working?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>hi</p>
<p>i am trying to solve nonlinear system of equations></p>
<p>But i faced problems with fsolve command and solve command</p>
<p>appreciate your efforts</p>
<p>thank you.</p>
<p>i attached the problem if any one can help me</p><p>hi</p>
<p>i am trying to solve nonlinear system of equations></p>
<p>But i faced problems with fsolve command and solve command</p>
<p>appreciate your efforts</p>
<p>thank you.</p>
<p>i attached the problem if any one can help me</p>202884Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:49:35 ZHamarshehHamarshehHow to Plot Partial Sum Sequence
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202825-How-To-Plot-Partial-Sum-Sequence?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>I'm trying to find the partial sum of the function. Now I need to plot the first couple partial sums onto 1 graph.</p>
<p>I'm not really sure how to input the plot function. I was able to graph it by inputting each partial sum function but I would prefer an easier solution.</p>
<p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/2spwhwI.png" alt="" width="990" height="550"></p><p>I'm trying to find the partial sum of the function. Now I need to plot the first couple partial sums onto 1 graph.</p>
<p>I'm not really sure how to input the plot function. I was able to graph it by inputting each partial sum function but I would prefer an easier solution.</p>
<p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/2spwhwI.png" alt="" width="990" height="550" /></p>202825Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:30:24 ZWitnessAWitnessAHow to Find Partial Sums of Airy's Function
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202790-How-To-Find-Partial-Sums-Of-Airys-Function?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am trying to figure out how to find several parital sums of the Airy's Function on a common screen. I figured out how to do it for a the Bessel fucntion of order 1, but I am not given the series for Airy's . Can anyone help me with what I would plug in to maple for the Airy's function or how I would go about finding the parital sums it would be greatly apperciated.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Rob</p><p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am trying to figure out how to find several parital sums of the Airy's Function on a common screen. I figured out how to do it for a the Bessel fucntion of order 1, but I am not given the series for Airy's . Can anyone help me with what I would plug in to maple for the Airy's function or how I would go about finding the parital sums it would be greatly apperciated.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Rob</p>202790Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:56:01 Zcarrollr2014carrollr2014Input angles in Maple 16 and in Maple calculator
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202749-Input-Angles-In-Maple-16-And-In-Maple-Calculator?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<div style="padding: 10px 0px 10px 0px; overflow: auto;">
<p>Hello!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm pretty new to Maple and I can't figure out how to input angles in degrees and radians in Maple 16 and in Maple Calculator.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>E.g. How could I type 58 degrees, 28 minutes, 18 seconds?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks in advance for your help!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>puckie62</p>
</div>202749Sun, 02 Nov 2014 06:00:12 Zpuckie62puckie62Bug in VectorCalculus:-int
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202661-Bug-In-VectorCalculusint?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>In Maple 16 (obviously, the result must be positive):</p>
<p><strong>VectorCalculus:-int(x+y, [x, y] = Sector(Ellipse((1/4)*x^2+(1/9)*y^2-1), 0, (1/2)*Pi));</strong></p>
<p> -2</p>
<p>Probably, this error occurs only in the latest versions, as in Maple 12 the output is correct. It would be interesting to know the reason for this behavior.</p>
<p> </p><p>In Maple 16 (obviously, the result must be positive):</p>
<p><strong>VectorCalculus:-int(x+y, [x, y] = Sector(Ellipse((1/4)*x^2+(1/9)*y^2-1), 0, (1/2)*Pi));</strong></p>
<p> -2</p>
<p>Probably, this error occurs only in the latest versions, as in Maple 12 the output is correct. It would be interesting to know the reason for this behavior.</p>
<p> </p>202661Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:26:09 ZKitonumKitonumHow to find the value of this integral
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202550-How-To-Find-The-Value-Of-This-Integral?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>u[0](x)=(1/GAMMA(0.5))*int((x-tau)^(0.5-1)*(tau^2+(tau^(1.5))*(8/(3))-tau-(2)*tau^0.5),tau=0..x);</p>
<p>I want to find the value of this integral</p>
<p>thank you </p><p>u[0](x)=(1/GAMMA(0.5))*int((x-tau)^(0.5-1)*(tau^2+(tau^(1.5))*(8/(3))-tau-(2)*tau^0.5),tau=0..x);</p>
<p>I want to find the value of this integral</p>
<p>thank you </p>202550Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:22:10 ZHamarshehHamarshehhow to solve the error of extra unknowns found
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202544-How-To-Solve-The-Error-Of-Extra-Unknowns-Found?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>> with(DEtools);<br>> with(plots);<br>> a := diff(y(x), x) = e(x)^(-0.1e-1*xy^2);</p>
<p>> g := dfieldplot(a, y(x), x = -8 .. 8, y(x) = -8 .. 8, color = e(x)^(-0.1e-1*xy^2));<br><strong>Error, (in DEtools/dfieldplot) extra unknowns found: xy</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>how to solve this?<br>> <br>></p><p>> with(DEtools);<br />> with(plots);<br />> a := diff(y(x), x) = e(x)^(-0.1e-1*xy^2);</p>
<p>> g := dfieldplot(a, y(x), x = -8 .. 8, y(x) = -8 .. 8, color = e(x)^(-0.1e-1*xy^2));<br /><strong>Error, (in DEtools/dfieldplot) extra unknowns found: xy</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>how to solve this?<br />> <br />></p>202544Thu, 09 Oct 2014 06:45:43 ZnurulnurulFsolve and Isolate Missing Solutions
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202376-Fsolve-And-Isolate-Missing-Solutions?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>To motivate some ideas in my research, I've been looking at the expected number of real roots of random polynomials (and their derivatives). In doing so I have noticed an issue/bug with<strong> fsolve</strong> and <strong>RootFinding[Isolate]</strong>. One of the polynomials I came upon was</p>
<p>f(x) = -32829/50000-(9277/50000)*x-(37251/20000)*x^2-(6101/6250)*x^3-(47777/20000)*x^4+(291213/50000)*x^5.</p>
<p>We know that f(x) has at least 1 real root and, in fact, graphing shows that f(x) has exactly 1 real root (~1.018). However, <strong>fsolve(f)</strong> and <strong>Isolate(f)</strong> both return no real roots. On the other hand, <strong>Isolate(f,method=RC)</strong> correctly returns the root near 1.018. I know that <strong>fsolve</strong>'s details page says "It may not return all roots for exceptionally ill-conditioned polynomials", though this system does not seem especially ill-conditioned. Moreover, <strong>Isolate</strong>'s help page says confidently "All significant digits returned by the program are correct, and <em>unlike purely numerical methods no roots are ever lost</em>, although repeated roots are discarded" which is clearly not the case here. It also seems interesting that the <strong>RealSolving</strong> package used by <strong>Isolate(f,method=RS)</strong> (default method) misses the root while the <strong>RegularChains</strong> package used by <strong>Isolate(f,method=RC)</strong> correctly finds the root.</p>
<p> All-in-all, I am not sure what to make of this. Is this an issue which has been fixed in more recent incarnations of <strong>fsolve</strong> or <strong>Isolate</strong>? Is this a persistent problem? Is there a theoretical reason why the root is being missed, particularly for <strong>Isolate</strong>?<br><br>Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.</p><p>To motivate some ideas in my research, I've been looking at the expected number of real roots of random polynomials (and their derivatives). In doing so I have noticed an issue/bug with<strong> fsolve</strong> and <strong>RootFinding[Isolate]</strong>. One of the polynomials I came upon was</p>
<p>f(x) = -32829/50000-(9277/50000)*x-(37251/20000)*x^2-(6101/6250)*x^3-(47777/20000)*x^4+(291213/50000)*x^5.</p>
<p>We know that f(x) has at least 1 real root and, in fact, graphing shows that f(x) has exactly 1 real root (~1.018). However, <strong>fsolve(f)</strong> and <strong>Isolate(f)</strong> both return no real roots. On the other hand, <strong>Isolate(f,method=RC)</strong> correctly returns the root near 1.018. I know that <strong>fsolve</strong>'s details page says "It may not return all roots for exceptionally ill-conditioned polynomials", though this system does not seem especially ill-conditioned. Moreover, <strong>Isolate</strong>'s help page says confidently "All significant digits returned by the program are correct, and <em>unlike purely numerical methods no roots are ever lost</em>, although repeated roots are discarded" which is clearly not the case here. It also seems interesting that the <strong>RealSolving</strong> package used by <strong>Isolate(f,method=RS)</strong> (default method) misses the root while the <strong>RegularChains</strong> package used by <strong>Isolate(f,method=RC)</strong> correctly finds the root.</p>
<p> All-in-all, I am not sure what to make of this. Is this an issue which has been fixed in more recent incarnations of <strong>fsolve</strong> or <strong>Isolate</strong>? Is this a persistent problem? Is there a theoretical reason why the root is being missed, particularly for <strong>Isolate</strong>?<br /><br />Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.</p>202376Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:29:12 ZbifurcationmanbifurcationmanHow to export an array from maple to matlab?
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202321-How-To-Export-An-Array-From-Maple-To-Matlab?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I need to transfer an array of size (M,N) from maple to matlab. But i dont know how to make it. Please help me for this. Thanx in advance.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Sunit</p><p>Hi,</p>
<p>I need to transfer an array of size (M,N) from maple to matlab. But i dont know how to make it. Please help me for this. Thanx in advance.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Sunit</p>202321Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:26:59 Zsunitsunitproblem with solving equation, I couldn't find any answer by solve or fsolve commands in maple
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202298-Problem-With-Solving-Equation-I-Couldnt?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>i := I;</p>
<p>assume(a>0);</p>
<p>assume(b>0);</p>
<p>assume(r>0);</p>
<p>assume(k>0);</p>
<p>assume(w>0);</p>
<p>Hz := k*(z^2-2*r*a+r^2)/((z-1)*(z^2-2*b*z+1));</p>
<p>Hzw := eval(Hz, z = exp(i*w)); assume(a > 0);</p>
<p>Habs := simplify(abs(Hzw)^2);</p>
<p>p1 := eval(Habs, w = Pi) = (10^((-3.3018)*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>p2 := eval(Habs, w = (1/2)*Pi) = (10^((-.1758)*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>p3 := eval(Habs, w = (1/4)*Pi) = (10^(6.425*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>p4 := eval(Habs, w = (1/8)*Pi) = (10^(54.5699*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>solve({p1, p2, p3, p4})</p>
<p> </p><p>i := I;</p>
<p>assume(a>0);</p>
<p>assume(b>0);</p>
<p>assume(r>0);</p>
<p>assume(k>0);</p>
<p>assume(w>0);</p>
<p>Hz := k*(z^2-2*r*a+r^2)/((z-1)*(z^2-2*b*z+1));</p>
<p>Hzw := eval(Hz, z = exp(i*w)); assume(a > 0);</p>
<p>Habs := simplify(abs(Hzw)^2);</p>
<p>p1 := eval(Habs, w = Pi) = (10^((-3.3018)*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>p2 := eval(Habs, w = (1/2)*Pi) = (10^((-.1758)*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>p3 := eval(Habs, w = (1/4)*Pi) = (10^(6.425*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>p4 := eval(Habs, w = (1/8)*Pi) = (10^(54.5699*(1/20)))^2;</p>
<p>solve({p1, p2, p3, p4})</p>
<p> </p>202298Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:14:49 ZmrhrezamrhrezaHow to use PlanePlot (after with(Student[LinearAlgebra]) ) for 2 equations?..
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202252-How-To-Use-PlanePlot-after-WithStudentLinearAlgebra?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>Dear Maple experts,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I would like to visualize the equation -3*x+2*y+3*z=0 and (with other color) 2*y+3*z =0. I used the following commands:</p>
<p>with(Student[LinearAlgebra]):<br>infolevel[Student[LinearAlgebra]]:=1:<br>PlanePlot(-3*x+ 2*y + 3*z = 0, [x,y,z], normaloptions=[shape=harpoon], showbasis);</p>
<p>But I do not know how to show at the same time the second equation (2*y+3*z=0 ).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>How should I proceed? Any hint?</p>
<p>Thanks for your attention,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Jean-Jaques</p>
<p> </p><p>Dear Maple experts,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I would like to visualize the equation -3*x+2*y+3*z=0 and (with other color) 2*y+3*z =0. I used the following commands:</p>
<p>with(Student[LinearAlgebra]):<br />infolevel[Student[LinearAlgebra]]:=1:<br />PlanePlot(-3*x+ 2*y + 3*z = 0, [x,y,z], normaloptions=[shape=harpoon], showbasis);</p>
<p>But I do not know how to show at the same time the second equation (2*y+3*z=0 ).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>How should I proceed? Any hint?</p>
<p>Thanks for your attention,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Jean-Jaques</p>
<p> </p>202252Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:40:38 ZjeanjacquesvvidejeanjacquesvvideFind extremes of numeric solution of ODE system
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/202181-Find-Extremes-Of-Numeric-Solution-Of-ODE-System?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Version Maple 16
<p>Hello! How can I find extremes of numeric solution of ODE system obtained using "dsolve"? Can I use something like "extrema" function?</p><p>Hello! How can I find extremes of numeric solution of ODE system obtained using "dsolve"? Can I use something like "extrema" function?</p>202181Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:16:04 Zdmytro_rubanovdmytro_rubanov