Dear All,
Does anyone actually use the latex facility with MapleTA? The more I look into it, the more I think that's the software is too buggy to be useful (that's the view that is echoed in past forum posts by other users).
The Maple TA documentation stats that you can author questions using the question bank, .qu script file or latex. Is there any documentation regarding the .qu script files? I've found only basic documentation regarding latex.
As an aside by current latex problem is using 'Maple' type questions, e.g.
\begin{question}{Maple}
\qutext{What is the derivative of $x^2$?}
\type{formula} % to allow the student to enter "2x"
\maple{evalb($RESPONSE = diff(x^2,x));}
\end{question}
On the latex2edu conversion I get the following errors:
first.qu: Unknown mode "Maple" requested for qu.1.1.type
Unknown mode "Maple" requested for qu.1.1.question
Unknown mode "Maple" requested for qu.1.1.info
Unknown mode "Maple" requested for qu.1.1.maple
Unknown mode "Maple" requested for qu.1.1.mode
Topic 1 is not fully set
Topic 1 (A topic) is missing question number 1.
But the .qu file is OK. Any ideas?
Best wishes,
Colin
MapleTA LaTeX
You are saying that the LaTeX example provided by the MapleTA documentation ought to work.
I agree: it does not work, especially in MapleTA3.**
The idea of integrating LaTeX into Maple and MapleTA is grand and worthy, but the implementation is pathetic.
I would love to use LaTeX to author MapleTA questions, but right now it is not practical. The confluence of LaTeX, html and Maple introduces ambiguities that the developers have not confronted. (Woe to the person who uses <!)
I tried hard to author MapleTA questions with LaTeX...hours turned into days which turned into frustration. There is no good documentation.
If somebody reports success, I would welcome their guidance.
Is there any progress on this?
It does seem bizarre (pathetic even) that the examples in the documentation don't work.
Is anybody successfully using LaTeX to produce questions (beyond the simplest ones)?
Toby
latex2ta
to Colin Gillespie
My understanding is that the response given by
http://latex2ta.mapleserver.com
should be regarded as "warnings" rather than "errors".
(I asked Andre Heck who had written quite a nice account of authoring
via latex2ta what all the output was about. The short answer is
"think of it as warnings, and irrelevant ones at that".
Andre and I would favour the code for this script being publicly viewable
so that we could try to improve it, or at least understand it.)
My firm belief is that the latex2ta authoring should be the default method
for mathematician authors of mapleta.
Grant Keady
keady@maths.uwa.edu.au
Well, I would prefered and
Well, I would prefered an offline editor, with latex capability for formulas, and maybe a Maple editor to introduce the algorithm,
but, in the mean time, with the resources we actually have i think latex authoring and edditing .qu is the best (in time and work) to develop questions, at least, to produce the formulas and write the question.
What I really hate is that with the examples of latex authoring i had discover a new question type: Matrix (yes i also read abut it on this forum) and graph capabilities (like sketch), so how many questions/options/newAndGreatThings are on MapleTA?
fcsc