Start off with the definition of an eigenvalue. If scalar lambda[i] is an eigenvalue then there exists a nontrival (not all-zero) vector x such that,
A . x = lambda[i] * x
Now, supposing that A^-1 (the inverse of A) exists, multiply (from the left) both sides of that equation by A^-1. This should result in,
x = A^-1 . lambda[i] . x
Now, multiply both sides of that equation on the left by scalar 1/lambda[i]. Realize that on the right-hand-side of the equation the scalar lambda[i] can be pulled out to the front (using linearity properties) allowing it to cancel with the 1/lambda[i] multiplicative factor. This should result in,
1/lambda[i] * x = A^-1 . x
Interpret that according to the definition of an eigenvalue. Add a note about whether lambda[i] can be zero.
outline
Start off with the definition of an eigenvalue. If scalar lambda[i] is an eigenvalue then there exists a nontrival (not all-zero) vector x such that,
A . x = lambda[i] * xNow, supposing that A^-1 (the inverse of A) exists, multiply (from the left) both sides of that equation by A^-1. This should result in,
x = A^-1 . lambda[i] . xNow, multiply both sides of that equation on the left by scalar 1/lambda[i]. Realize that on the right-hand-side of the equation the scalar lambda[i] can be pulled out to the front (using linearity properties) allowing it to cancel with the 1/lambda[i] multiplicative factor. This should result in,
Interpret that according to the definition of an eigenvalue. Add a note about whether lambda[i] can be zero.
acer
Thanks
Thanks a lot.
I'm embarrassed. I bet this is a standard example in some Linear Algebra text somewhere.
dc.