Following worse-than-good advice can lead to loss of time and to greater misunderstanding. I have noticed, over the past year, a growing proportion of suboptimal responses and advice on the mapleprimes forums.
There are still many fine responses, but slightly incorrect or inefficient (and sometimes outright wrong) responses seem to have been growing as a proportion of the whole. This is probably natural, as the mapleprimes site grows. But some of the ensuing bad effects of it could be avoided.
I'm not interested in making anyone feel badly, or in instigating any forms of competition. But, wouldn't it better help the new Maple users, and members who post queries here, if there were some way to distinguish the superior responses from the inferior ones?
I'm thinking of something similar to what google groups does with posts. Some scheme where registered members may vote a score for each post (and each reply!) -- almost as if every post were a minipoll with choices in the 1-5 range for quality.
acer
Seconded
Question asking sites (e.g. Yahoo Answers and Ask Metafilter) and review sites (e.g. the Amazon reviews) use a system like this. In the case of "answers" sites, there is often a special rating set aside for the original "asker" to specify that an answer was helpful to their situation directly.
It looks like there are a lot of Drupal modules to do this sort of thing, but it is not obvious from a quick look which is the right one for Mapleprimes.
John
for short
for short: I am not a friend of such things and never do it ...
what also may help is the ratio of views/posts for thread
yes
The number of views of a blog posting used to be shown here, beside the entry.
After a year or so of mapleprimes (the long "beta"?) that functionality was removed. I once posted about that, and the response (by Will? I can't find it now) was that someone would look into it.
acer
:-)
from experience there lot other variants of answers, which leave everything vague :-)
I third the motion
I support both sides here. It would be nice to have a rating feature, but on sites that have them I often leave them blank.
BUT, when I do find something that is clearly helpful - or not - I am inclined to vote. And, this might not be so bad.
I hope Maplesoft (i.e., Will) will look into this and determine the best way to move forward with this proposal.
Doug
Good idea
A system that allows you to vote for/against (like on reddit) but is completely optional would be best. Good answers would rise up, bad answers get buried. It also seems to work fine on digg.