<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MaplePrimes - comments on Blog Entry, Fitting Circles to 3D Data - an Update</title>
    <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/maplesoftblog/88732-Fitting-Circles-To-3D-Data--An-Update</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.</copyright>
    <generator>Maplesoft Document System</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:05:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <itunes:subtitle />
    <itunes:summary />
    <description>The latest comments added to the Blog Entry, Fitting Circles to 3D Data - an Update</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>objective function</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/maplesoftblog/88732-Fitting-Circles-To-3D-Data--An-Update?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Fitting Circles to 3D Data - an Update:Comments#comment89116</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;I believe the objective function f2 isn't quite right.&amp;nbsp; That is, you don't want to minize the distance to the center, but rather the distance to the circle. Consider the simpler case of fitting a 0-dimensional circle (two points) to a set of points on a line. Specifically, assume the data consists of [-1, 1, 1]&amp;nbsp; (the 1 is repeated).&amp;nbsp; The best fit is clearly the two points -1 and 1 (i.e. the "circle" with unit radius centered at 0).&amp;nbsp; Fitting to the center of mass of these points gives a nonideal result.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Blog Entry, Fitting Circles to 3D Data - an Update</description>
      <guid>89116</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:34:48 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Joe Riel</itunes:author>
      <author>Joe Riel</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Function</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/maplesoftblog/88732-Fitting-Circles-To-3D-Data--An-Update?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Fitting Circles to 3D Data - an Update:Comments#comment89312</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The objective function f2 is the square of the distance from the center of the circle to a data point. The quantity sigma2 is the sum of squares of the deviations sqrt(f2)-r. It is sigma2 that is measuring the deviations from the circle. The function f2 is an intermediate step in this calculation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consider the problem in the xy-plane. The circle would be (x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2. For the data point (u,v), the comparable deviation would be of the form (u-h)^2+(v-k)^2. The geometry shows that this is the distance from the center to the data point. Comparing the square root of this to r is then a measure of how close the point is to the circle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the 3D case, sigma1 is used to find the best-fit plane. Then, sigma2 is used to find the best-fit circle, in analogy with the 2D case. Fitting the points to a sphere, as was done originally, is not as effective as the process used in the updated version of this calculation, as the graphs in Figures 1 and 3 show.&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RJL Maplesoft&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Blog Entry, Fitting Circles to 3D Data - an Update</description>
      <guid>89312</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:07:33 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>rlopez</itunes:author>
      <author>rlopez</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>