<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MaplePrimes - comments on Post, MRB constant rational?A</title>
    <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/101640-MRB-Constant-RationalA</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.</copyright>
    <generator>Maplesoft Document System</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:33:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <itunes:subtitle />
    <itunes:summary />
    <description>The latest comments added to the Post, MRB constant rational?A</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>Algebraic normal conjecture 1</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/101640-MRB-Constant-RationalA?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:MRB constant rational?A:Comments#comment101689</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Algebraic normal conjecture 1: The digits of the MRB constant are normally distributed, so it is irrational.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It has been conjectured that every irrational algebraic number is normal and the MRB constant is a sum of irrational algebraic numbers.&amp;nbsp; Thus it is not too much of a stretch to conjecture that the digits of the MRB constant are also&amp;nbsp;normally distributed, so if you search far enough into that sting of digits, you will find any particular finite sequence you wish to find. That includes m consecutive 0&amp;rsquo;s and m digit patterns. However, according to the Archimedean property of real numbers, there exists an integer greater than m called m+1. Since there were only m digits in the pattern, the m+1 digit does not follow that pattern. Thus we have shown that if the MRB constant is normal then it is irrational.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Post, MRB constant rational?A</description>
      <guid>101689</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 01:34:09 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Marvin Ray Burns</itunes:author>
      <author>Marvin Ray Burns</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&amp;nbsp;The definition of a normal numbner</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/101640-MRB-Constant-RationalA?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:MRB constant rational?A:Comments#comment101791</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The definition of a normal numbner is given at &lt;a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalNumber.html"&gt;http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalNumber.html&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had said that it is not too much of a stretch to conjecture that the digits of the MRB constant are also&amp;nbsp;normally distributed. However, to say that the MRB constant is normal is to say that it is irrational with or without this theorem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A rational&amp;nbsp;number is not normal, because the last digits are all 0's or follow a repeating pattern; while an irrational number may be normal, (like&amp;nbsp;sqrt(2) is conjectured to be),&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp; not normal like&amp;nbsp;the &lt;a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ChampernowneConstant.html"&gt;Champernowne constant&lt;/a&gt;. So only irrational numbers are normal and if a number is normal it is irrational. So sadly my&amp;nbsp;Algebraic normal conjecture 1 is useless!&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Post, MRB constant rational?A</description>
      <guid>101791</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:23:20 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Marvin Ray Burns</itunes:author>
      <author>Marvin Ray Burns</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Normality in Base 10</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/101640-MRB-Constant-RationalA?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:MRB constant rational?A:Comments#comment102558</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; color: black; font-size: 7.5pt;"&gt;Here you can see for yourself how normal the first 5,000 digits of the MRB constant are. However, that doesn't mean that the constant is either normal or irrational. It is fun, however, to see its digits being analyzed so quickly!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; color: black; font-size: 7.5pt;"&gt;Now you can view demonstrations in your browser, after a quick download.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/HowNormalIsTheMRBConstant/"&gt;http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/HowNormalIsTheMRBConstant/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Post, MRB constant rational?A</description>
      <guid>102558</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:34:08 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Marvin Ray Burns</itunes:author>
      <author>Marvin Ray Burns</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>