<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MaplePrimes - comments on Post, Balls and Weight...</title>
    <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/143396-Balls-And-Weight</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.</copyright>
    <generator>Maplesoft Document System</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:10:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:10:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <itunes:subtitle />
    <itunes:summary />
    <description>The latest comments added to the Post, Balls and Weight...</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>Generalizing and Speculating</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/143396-Balls-And-Weight?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Balls and Weight...:Comments#comment143406</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Note that the same procedure works with nine balls. More generally, with w weighings, one can find a single heavy ball in a group of 3^w balls, ignoring practical considerations like &amp;nbsp;the precision of the scale. One might ask why wasn't the puzzle posed with 9 balls. &amp;nbsp;Probably because 9's factorization makes it easier to guess the solution.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Post, Balls and Weight...</description>
      <guid>143406</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:45:31 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Joe Riel</itunes:author>
      <author>Joe Riel</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>