<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MaplePrimes - comments on Post, Inverse Laplace xform of exponential function with summation</title>
    <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/42469-Inverse-Laplace-Xform-Of-Exponential</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.</copyright>
    <generator>Maplesoft Document System</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:53:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:53:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <itunes:subtitle />
    <itunes:summary />
    <description>The latest comments added to the Post, Inverse Laplace xform of exponential function with summation</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>unidentified constants</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/42469-Inverse-Laplace-Xform-Of-Exponential?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Inverse Laplace xform of exponential function with summation:Comments#comment79460</link>
      <itunes:summary>Maple can't solve your eq1, unless you tell it the values of the constants T[1] .. T[n].

Hope this helps.

J. Tarr</itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Post, Inverse Laplace xform of exponential function with summation</description>
      <guid>79460</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:43:34 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Mariner</itunes:author>
      <author>Mariner</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A workaround</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/42469-Inverse-Laplace-Xform-Of-Exponential?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Inverse Laplace xform of exponential function with summation:Comments#comment79394</link>
      <itunes:summary>A workaround is &lt;pre&gt;applyop(inttrans[invlaplace],1,eq1,s,t) assuming T[i]&gt;0;

                  &lt;maple&gt;sum((-1)^i*Heaviside(t-T[i]),i = 1 .. n)&lt;/maple&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; 
The assume command after the restart command in your code is not necessary.            </itunes:summary>
      <description>The latest comments added to the Post, Inverse Laplace xform of exponential function with summation</description>
      <guid>79394</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:00:21 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>alec</itunes:author>
      <author>alec</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>