<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MaplePrimes - answers and comments on Question, Solving a complicated nonlinear equation numerically</title>
    <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/129258-Solving-A-Complicated-Nonlinear-Equation</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.</copyright>
    <generator>Maplesoft Document System</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:50:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <itunes:subtitle />
    <itunes:summary />
    <description>The latest answers and comments added to the Question, Solving a complicated nonlinear equation numerically</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>a remark</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/129258-Solving-A-Complicated-Nonlinear-Equation?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Solving a complicated nonlinear equation numerically:Comments#answer129266</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Roughly you want&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6.6e18906*n*((-2.302585093+ln((-6.*n+7.*n*m+4.*n*t+8.-10.*t-10.*m)/(-2.*n+2.*n*m+n*t-3.*m-4.*t+3.)))/(.5e6990-.1e6990*n)&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;^(7447/10000)/m)^(10000/2753)*m +&lt;br&gt;690.7755279-.3e3*ln((-6.*n+7.*n*m+4.*n*t+8.-10.*t-10.*m)/(-2.*n+2.*n*m+n*t-3.*m-4.*t+3.)) = 0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As it was said 6.6e18906 is likely to kill numerics - where you would have to supply concrete&lt;br&gt;values for m=taum and t=taut to work at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And symbolically I have doubts there are usable solutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best would be to think about appropriate scaling of variables, which you have to do before&lt;br&gt;arriving at your final task.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just as thoughts&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Roughly you want&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6.6e18906*n*((-2.302585093+ln((-6.*n+7.*n*m+4.*n*t+8.-10.*t-10.*m)/(-2.*n+2.*n*m+n*t-3.*m-4.*t+3.)))/(.5e6990-.1e6990*n)&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;^(7447/10000)/m)^(10000/2753)*m +&lt;br&gt;690.7755279-.3e3*ln((-6.*n+7.*n*m+4.*n*t+8.-10.*t-10.*m)/(-2.*n+2.*n*m+n*t-3.*m-4.*t+3.)) = 0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As it was said 6.6e18906 is likely to kill numerics - where you would have to supply concrete&lt;br&gt;values for m=taum and t=taut to work at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And symbolically I have doubts there are usable solutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best would be to think about appropriate scaling of variables, which you have to do before&lt;br&gt;arriving at your final task.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just as thoughts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>129266</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:49:22 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Axel Vogt</itunes:author>
      <author>Axel Vogt</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smoothed-out code</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/129258-Solving-A-Complicated-Nonlinear-Equation?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Solving a complicated nonlinear equation numerically:Comments#answer129273</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;This should work in Maple 14 or 15:&lt;br&gt;Digits := 20; &lt;br&gt;EQN := 5.915635290*10^18905*n*(ln(expand(.1974600000*(4.137221948*10^9-3.187977881*10^9*n+&lt;br&gt;3.579712132*10^9*n*taum+2.049414400*10^9*n*taut-5.560674900*10^9*taum-5.560674900*10^9*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^9*n+2.333329620*10^9*n*taum+1.372164917*10^9*n*taut+2.519530558*10^9-&lt;br&gt;3.492604298*10^9*taum-3.723094273*10^9*taut))/((5.012372749*10^6989-&lt;br&gt;1.379404981*10^6989*n)^evalf(7447/10000)*taum))^evalf(10000/2753)-319.9820565*&lt;br&gt;ln((19746.*(4.137221948*10^11-3.187977881*10^11*n+3.579712132*10^11*n*taum+&lt;br&gt;2.049414400*10^11*n*taut-5.560674900*10^11*taum-5.560674900*10^11*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^16*n+2.333329620*10^16*n*taum+1.372164917*10^16*n*taut+&lt;br&gt;2.519530558*10^16-3.492604298*10^16*taum-3.723094273*10^16*taut))/taum = 0;&lt;br&gt;#smoothed-out code: expand in logarithm and evalfed exponents&lt;br&gt;UUU := solve(EQN, n, useassumptions)assuming 0 &amp;lt; taut, taut &amp;lt; 1, taum &amp;gt; 0, taum &amp;lt; 1;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This should work in Maple 14 or 15:&lt;br&gt;Digits := 20; &lt;br&gt;EQN := 5.915635290*10^18905*n*(ln(expand(.1974600000*(4.137221948*10^9-3.187977881*10^9*n+&lt;br&gt;3.579712132*10^9*n*taum+2.049414400*10^9*n*taut-5.560674900*10^9*taum-5.560674900*10^9*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^9*n+2.333329620*10^9*n*taum+1.372164917*10^9*n*taut+2.519530558*10^9-&lt;br&gt;3.492604298*10^9*taum-3.723094273*10^9*taut))/((5.012372749*10^6989-&lt;br&gt;1.379404981*10^6989*n)^evalf(7447/10000)*taum))^evalf(10000/2753)-319.9820565*&lt;br&gt;ln((19746.*(4.137221948*10^11-3.187977881*10^11*n+3.579712132*10^11*n*taum+&lt;br&gt;2.049414400*10^11*n*taut-5.560674900*10^11*taum-5.560674900*10^11*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^16*n+2.333329620*10^16*n*taum+1.372164917*10^16*n*taut+&lt;br&gt;2.519530558*10^16-3.492604298*10^16*taum-3.723094273*10^16*taut))/taum = 0;&lt;br&gt;#smoothed-out code: expand in logarithm and evalfed exponents&lt;br&gt;UUU := solve(EQN, n, useassumptions)assuming 0 &amp;lt; taut, taut &amp;lt; 1, taum &amp;gt; 0, taum &amp;lt; 1;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>129273</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:19:07 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Markiyan Hirnyk</itunes:author>
      <author>Markiyan Hirnyk</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enquiry: Smoothed-out code can't work now for the same equation</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/129258-Solving-A-Complicated-Nonlinear-Equation?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Solving a complicated nonlinear equation numerically:Comments#comment129293</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I first tried to solve the equation, EQN, by following the method below, it worked, ie., EQN can be solved. But when I tried to solve the same equation again using the same method as below,&amp;nbsp;the equation EQN,&amp;nbsp;cannot be solved now! I wonder why. It is strange.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Digits := 20; &lt;br&gt;EQN := 5.915635290*10^18905*n*(ln(expand(.1974600000*(4.137221948*10^9-3.187977881*10^9*n+&lt;br&gt;3.579712132*10^9*n*taum+2.049414400*10^9*n*taut-5.560674900*10^9*taum-5.560674900*10^9*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^9*n+2.333329620*10^9*n*taum+1.372164917*10^9*n*taut+2.519530558*10^9-&lt;br&gt;3.492604298*10^9*taum-3.723094273*10^9*taut))/((5.012372749*10^6989-&lt;br&gt;1.379404981*10^6989*n)^evalf(7447/10000)*taum))^evalf(10000/2753)-319.9820565*&lt;br&gt;ln((19746.*(4.137221948*10^11-3.187977881*10^11*n+3.579712132*10^11*n*taum+&lt;br&gt;2.049414400*10^11*n*taut-5.560674900*10^11*taum-5.560674900*10^11*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^16*n+2.333329620*10^16*n*taum+1.372164917*10^16*n*taut+&lt;br&gt;2.519530558*10^16-3.492604298*10^16*taum-3.723094273*10^16*taut))/taum = 0;&lt;br&gt;#smoothed-out code: expand in logarithm and evalfed exponents&lt;br&gt;UUU := solve(EQN, n, useassumptions)assuming 0 &amp;lt; taut, taut &amp;lt; 1, taum &amp;gt; 0, taum &amp;lt; 1;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance for any kind advice!&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I first tried to solve the equation, EQN, by following the method below, it worked, ie., EQN can be solved. But when I tried to solve the same equation again using the same method as below,&amp;nbsp;the equation EQN,&amp;nbsp;cannot be solved now! I wonder why. It is strange.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Digits := 20; &lt;br&gt;EQN := 5.915635290*10^18905*n*(ln(expand(.1974600000*(4.137221948*10^9-3.187977881*10^9*n+&lt;br&gt;3.579712132*10^9*n*taum+2.049414400*10^9*n*taut-5.560674900*10^9*taum-5.560674900*10^9*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^9*n+2.333329620*10^9*n*taum+1.372164917*10^9*n*taut+2.519530558*10^9-&lt;br&gt;3.492604298*10^9*taum-3.723094273*10^9*taut))/((5.012372749*10^6989-&lt;br&gt;1.379404981*10^6989*n)^evalf(7447/10000)*taum))^evalf(10000/2753)-319.9820565*&lt;br&gt;ln((19746.*(4.137221948*10^11-3.187977881*10^11*n+3.579712132*10^11*n*taum+&lt;br&gt;2.049414400*10^11*n*taut-5.560674900*10^11*taum-5.560674900*10^11*taut))/&lt;br&gt;(-2.065539727*10^16*n+2.333329620*10^16*n*taum+1.372164917*10^16*n*taut+&lt;br&gt;2.519530558*10^16-3.492604298*10^16*taum-3.723094273*10^16*taut))/taum = 0;&lt;br&gt;#smoothed-out code: expand in logarithm and evalfed exponents&lt;br&gt;UUU := solve(EQN, n, useassumptions)assuming 0 &amp;lt; taut, taut &amp;lt; 1, taum &amp;gt; 0, taum &amp;lt; 1;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance for any kind advice!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>129293</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:29:55 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>yewslyewsl</itunes:author>
      <author>yewslyewsl</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestion</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/129258-Solving-A-Complicated-Nonlinear-Equation?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Solving a complicated nonlinear equation numerically:Comments#comment129317</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/129258-Solving-A-Complicated-Nonlinear-Equation#comment129293"&gt;@yewslyewsl&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;My explanation is the following: such Maple commands as solve, dsolve, limit, and int can produce different outputs in different executions and sessions.&amp;nbsp; For example, look at the recent post&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/128885-Dsolve-Boundary-Condition-On-Infinity#comment128886"&gt;http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/128885-Dsolve-Boundary-Condition-On-Infinity#comment128886&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, I don't see a workaround for this.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/129258-Solving-A-Complicated-Nonlinear-Equation#comment129293"&gt;@yewslyewsl&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;My explanation is the following: such Maple commands as solve, dsolve, limit, and int can produce different outputs in different executions and sessions.&amp;nbsp; For example, look at the recent post&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/128885-Dsolve-Boundary-Condition-On-Infinity#comment128886"&gt;http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/128885-Dsolve-Boundary-Condition-On-Infinity#comment128886&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, I don't see a workaround for this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>129317</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:04:50 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Markiyan Hirnyk</itunes:author>
      <author>Markiyan Hirnyk</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>