<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MaplePrimes - answers and comments on Question, How to understand the _Z in Bessel equation</title>
    <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/144053-How-To-Understand-The-Z-In-Bessel-Equation</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.</copyright>
    <generator>Maplesoft Document System</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:12:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:12:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <itunes:subtitle />
    <itunes:summary />
    <description>The latest answers and comments added to the Question, How to understand the _Z in Bessel equation</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>Explanation of RootOf</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/144053-How-To-Understand-The-Z-In-Bessel-Equation?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:How to understand the _Z in Bessel equation:Comments#answer144084</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The following answers apply to the transcendental &lt;strong&gt;RootOf&lt;/strong&gt;. The situation for the polynomial &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;is slightly different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q1)&amp;nbsp; How can I evaluate the RootOf?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can substitute values for the variables and apply commands to it just as you can with any other expression. Just don't substitute for the "with respect to" variable (the &lt;strong&gt;_Z&lt;/strong&gt;). That wouldn't make sense, just like substituting a nonatomic expression for &lt;strong&gt;x &lt;/strong&gt;in &lt;strong&gt;int(f(x), x) &lt;/strong&gt;or &lt;strong&gt;solve(f(x), x) &lt;/strong&gt;wouldn't make sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q2) In other words, What is it saying?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/search.aspx?term=RootOf"&gt;?RootOf&lt;/a&gt; is Maple's way of expressing an inverse function (usually with multiple branches) for which it otherwise has no expression. Another way of thinking about it is that it's Maple's way of expressing an implicitly defined function (usually one with multiple branches).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q3) Is there any way that I can get an expression without &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;for the variable that I am solving for?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For an exact symbolic solution, generally, no, not unless you are aware of some solving technique which Maple is not using. A floating-point solution is usually possible if you supply numeric values to the parameters. In either case, you can try to apply the command &lt;a href="http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/search.aspx?term=allvalues"&gt;?allvalues&lt;/a&gt;. That is the command specifically designed for expressions containing &lt;strong&gt;RootOf&lt;/strong&gt;. Especially, try to reduce the &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;expression with &lt;strong&gt;allvalues&lt;/strong&gt; if you have assigned numeric values to some of the parameters. If you've applied assumptions to some of the parameters, then try &lt;strong&gt;simplify&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q4) Is there any way that I can get an analytical expression for the variable that I am solving for?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am guessing that what you really meant by this question is what I answered in Q3 above. But I separated out this question so that I coud point out that an expression with &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; an analytic expression. You can generally apply to it all the Maple commands that you would apply to any other analytic expression, including &lt;strong&gt;diff&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;series&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;simplify&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q5)&amp;nbsp; Or from here we can only get numerical means to solve for the variable. If so, how to proceed?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use &lt;a href="http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/search.aspx?term=eval"&gt;?eval&lt;/a&gt; to supply numeric values to the parameters, then apply &lt;strong&gt;allvalues&lt;/strong&gt;. At this point, you may need to select a branch. Then apply &lt;strong&gt;evalf&lt;/strong&gt;. There are cases where not all branches will satisfy the original equation, so plug back into the original to check.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The following answers apply to the transcendental &lt;strong&gt;RootOf&lt;/strong&gt;. The situation for the polynomial &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;is slightly different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q1)&amp;nbsp; How can I evaluate the RootOf?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can substitute values for the variables and apply commands to it just as you can with any other expression. Just don't substitute for the "with respect to" variable (the &lt;strong&gt;_Z&lt;/strong&gt;). That wouldn't make sense, just like substituting a nonatomic expression for &lt;strong&gt;x &lt;/strong&gt;in &lt;strong&gt;int(f(x), x) &lt;/strong&gt;or &lt;strong&gt;solve(f(x), x) &lt;/strong&gt;wouldn't make sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q2) In other words, What is it saying?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/search.aspx?term=RootOf"&gt;?RootOf&lt;/a&gt; is Maple's way of expressing an inverse function (usually with multiple branches) for which it otherwise has no expression. Another way of thinking about it is that it's Maple's way of expressing an implicitly defined function (usually one with multiple branches).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q3) Is there any way that I can get an expression without &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;for the variable that I am solving for?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For an exact symbolic solution, generally, no, not unless you are aware of some solving technique which Maple is not using. A floating-point solution is usually possible if you supply numeric values to the parameters. In either case, you can try to apply the command &lt;a href="http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/search.aspx?term=allvalues"&gt;?allvalues&lt;/a&gt;. That is the command specifically designed for expressions containing &lt;strong&gt;RootOf&lt;/strong&gt;. Especially, try to reduce the &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;expression with &lt;strong&gt;allvalues&lt;/strong&gt; if you have assigned numeric values to some of the parameters. If you've applied assumptions to some of the parameters, then try &lt;strong&gt;simplify&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q4) Is there any way that I can get an analytical expression for the variable that I am solving for?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am guessing that what you really meant by this question is what I answered in Q3 above. But I separated out this question so that I coud point out that an expression with &lt;strong&gt;RootOf &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; an analytic expression. You can generally apply to it all the Maple commands that you would apply to any other analytic expression, including &lt;strong&gt;diff&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;series&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;simplify&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q5)&amp;nbsp; Or from here we can only get numerical means to solve for the variable. If so, how to proceed?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use &lt;a href="http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/search.aspx?term=eval"&gt;?eval&lt;/a&gt; to supply numeric values to the parameters, then apply &lt;strong&gt;allvalues&lt;/strong&gt;. At this point, you may need to select a branch. Then apply &lt;strong&gt;evalf&lt;/strong&gt;. There are cases where not all branches will satisfy the original equation, so plug back into the original to check.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>144084</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:53:25 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Carl Love</itunes:author>
      <author>Carl Love</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thankyou</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/144053-How-To-Understand-The-Z-In-Bessel-Equation?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:How to understand the _Z in Bessel equation:Comments#comment144095</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Dear Carl Love,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your time in replying an explanation with good insights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Carl Love,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your time in replying an explanation with good insights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>144095</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:21:22 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>maplelearner</itunes:author>
      <author>maplelearner</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>