<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MaplePrimes - answers and comments on Question, Plotting expressions with several variables</title>
    <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/38629-Plotting-Expressions-With-Several-Variables</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Maplesoft, A Division of Waterloo Maple Inc.</copyright>
    <generator>Maplesoft Document System</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:40:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:40:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <itunes:subtitle />
    <itunes:summary />
    <description>The latest answers and comments added to the Question, Plotting expressions with several variables</description>
    
    <item>
      <title>implicitplot?</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/38629-Plotting-Expressions-With-Several-Variables?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Plotting expressions with several variables:Comments#answer69626</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;One option is to look at the curves formed by the solutions of the equations using &lt;b&gt;plots[implicitplot]&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Another option is &lt;b&gt;plot3d&lt;/b&gt; to look at the surfaces of their graphs as functions in two variables.&amp;nbsp; Either of those options is going to require some tweaking of your equations.&amp;nbsp; Exactly what you should do really depends on what you are trying to figure out about these equations.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One option is to look at the curves formed by the solutions of the equations using &lt;b&gt;plots[implicitplot]&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Another option is &lt;b&gt;plot3d&lt;/b&gt; to look at the surfaces of their graphs as functions in two variables.&amp;nbsp; Either of those options is going to require some tweaking of your equations.&amp;nbsp; Exactly what you should do really depends on what you are trying to figure out about these equations.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>69626</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:15:37 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>momiji</itunes:author>
      <author>momiji</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Step back</title>
      <link>http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/38629-Plotting-Expressions-With-Several-Variables?ref=Feed:MaplePrimes:Plotting expressions with several variables:Comments#answer69624</link>
      <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Take a step back and look at your equations. They decouple into some rather simple curves. For example, the first equation corresponds to a pair of perpendicular lines that can be plotted as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;G1:=plot({[a,0,a=-3..1],[-156/61,b,b=-1..1]},color=red,axes=boxed);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second equation corresponds to a curve that can be plotted as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;G2:=plot([a,-(2/529)*(39*a^2+128+119*a)/a^2,a=0.5..2],color=green);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The third equation looks like this curve:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;G3:=plot([-(2/299)*(-493+5520*b)/(23*b-2),b,b=-2..2],color=blue);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now plots[display](G1,G2,G3); shows the solutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you looking for a simultaneous solution to the three equations, subject to the contraint imposed by the inequality? You can see that there seems to be no solution, regardless of the inequality constraint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is confirmed by the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;solve({0 = -(1/345)*(-28704*b*a-11224*b*a^2)/a, 0 &amp;lt; -(1/345)*(-6877*b*a^2-11040*b*a+986*a+598*a^2)/a, 0 = -(1/345)*(7935*b*a^2+1170*a^2+3840+3570*a)/a});&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Take a step back and look at your equations. They decouple into some rather simple curves. For example, the first equation corresponds to a pair of perpendicular lines that can be plotted as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;G1:=plot({[a,0,a=-3..1],[-156/61,b,b=-1..1]},color=red,axes=boxed);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second equation corresponds to a curve that can be plotted as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;G2:=plot([a,-(2/529)*(39*a^2+128+119*a)/a^2,a=0.5..2],color=green);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The third equation looks like this curve:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;G3:=plot([-(2/299)*(-493+5520*b)/(23*b-2),b,b=-2..2],color=blue);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now plots[display](G1,G2,G3); shows the solutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you looking for a simultaneous solution to the three equations, subject to the contraint imposed by the inequality? You can see that there seems to be no solution, regardless of the inequality constraint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is confirmed by the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;solve({0 = -(1/345)*(-28704*b*a-11224*b*a^2)/a, 0 &amp;lt; -(1/345)*(-6877*b*a^2-11040*b*a+986*a+598*a^2)/a, 0 = -(1/345)*(7935*b*a^2+1170*a^2+3840+3570*a)/a});&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>69624</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:06:01 Z</pubDate>
      <itunes:author>Alex
 Smith
</itunes:author>
      <author>Alex
 Smith
</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>