Items tagged with calculation calculation Tagged Items Feed

Hi Everybody.

 

Doing some calculation in quantum mechanics, I stuble on that integral:

I see immediately that the answer is 1/2.  But Maple 18 cannot give an answer other than a limit that he cannot evaluate.  I even try assumption that p and hbar are realcons.  I get infinity.

Any idea?

Thank you in advance for your help.

 

--------------------------------------
Mario Lemelin
Maple 18 Ubuntu 13.10 - 64 bits
Maple 18 Win 7 - 64 bits messagerie : mario.lemelin@cgocable.ca téléphone :  (819) 376-0987

Hi everybody,

I have never done statistics in Maple.  In a simple calculation, I need to calculate the RMS of 55 numbers.  The average of those numbers is 100484.3 and it is given that the RMS is 1.28 counts.  I have the a list of the 55 numbers.  Since I don't need a demonstration, it would help me a lot if you could tell me how to load the data from a *.txt file (one number per line), and use the appropriate commands to obtaine the result that is only given.

For the moment, I only need the steps to proceed with the calculations and how to do it in Maple.

Thank you very much in advance for your help.

 

--------------------------------------
Mario Lemelin
Maple 18 Ubuntu 13.10 - 64 bits
Maple 18 Win 7 - 64 bits messagerie : mario.lemelin@cgocable.ca téléphone :  (819) 376-0987

Hi all

 

Please, I'd like to clarify some basic points about performing computations in Maple 18. Up to now I have been doing some numeric calcs using matrices normally composed of 10 to 15 columns and 200 to 600 rows.

 

When doing the calcs with a matrix of ~200 rows, it is just ok but as the number of rows increase the calculation speed reduces significantly.

 

The data contained in each row is calculated within a loop cycle (i.e.: for i from 1 to 200 do ......).

 

The number of rows is controlled by a slider so when I drag the slider the calcs are automatically updated and the results shown graphically.

 

As I said it is too slow so I don't know if I should be looking into the option of doing calcs symbolically first? However you can't use symbolic notation when working with matrices. I still got a lot of calcs to do but prefer not to continue as it will only get slower so better to see if I can optimise speed.

 

Any comment is trully appreciated.

 

Regards

Cesar

how maple calculate exp(x) with e.g. 100000 decimal numbers

a divsion of the series x^k/k! with e.g. 1/25000!/25001 lasts longer than the exp(1.xx) calculation

 

is there a faster way to calculate exp(x) than with the x^k/k! series

 

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi everyone,

 

At some point in my calculations, I want to do some simple manipulations wiht the use of the «clickable» features in M17.  For the moment, I can see directy how to do it by hand and I do it by copy-paste and use the mous to change it a little bit.  But I just cannot find a simple way to do it by simple click.

 

You will find in this attach question, the maipulations I want to do.  It is starting from equaiton (7).  Am I at the edge where it is simple by hand than with the features?

 Space_manipulation.mw

 

Thank you in advance.

--------------------------------------
Mario Lemelin
Maple 17.02 Ubuntu 13.10 - 64 bits
Maple 17 Win 7 - 64 bits messagerie : mario.lemelin@cgocable.ca téléphone :  (819) 376-0987

Hi everybody,

When doing calculations, I often run in the following problem.  I have the final solution wich I simplify symbolically so many terms are cancelling.  But I get this:

sqrt(2)*sqrt(g)/sqrt(b)

While I would like to regroup all the terms into the square root.  But look, even in this forum, Maple get sqrt(2) automatically out of the square root.

sqrt(2*g/b)

I know that it is the simple form.  But in some instances, I need the square root to stay together so I can show a property.  But is there a way to be able, sometimes, to tell Maple to leave all the terms under the square root?

Thank you in advance for your help.

 

--------------------------------------
Mario Lemelin
Maple 17.01 Ubuntu 13.10 - 64 bits
Maple 17 Win 7 - 64 bits messagerie : mario.lemelin@cgocable.ca téléphone :  (819) 376-0987

Hi everyone

I'm currently working on some mandate distribution using "Jefforson's Method" but I have run into some problems.

The general form of the calculations I do is as follows:

d:=fsolve(m = floor(v1/x)+floor(v2/x), x)

But in the case of m=5, v1=4969 and v2=208 it does not work. If I change v1 a bit it works as a charm but when 
4960=<v1=<4969 it does not.

Can any of you figure out why?

 

The equation surely has a solution (well, a lot of solutions). I can figure some out just by estimating and trying. Furthermore, wolfram alpha easily gives me several solutions:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=5+%3D+floor%284969%2Fx%29%2Bfloor%28208%2Fx%29

So how come I cannot get Maple to solve it?

 

Thanks in advance!

q[1] = sqrt(x)*alpha-lambda(sqrt(x)*alpha-lambda*q[1]*q[3]-p[2])*(sqrt(x)*alpha-lambda*q[1]*q[2]-p[3])-p[1]

I am looking for q[1] solution. When I solve for q[1], maple gives me following answer:

q[1] = RootOf(-_Z+sqrt(x)*alpha-lambda(sqrt(x)*alpha-lambda*_Z*q[3]-p[2])*sqrt(x)*alpha+lambda(sqrt(x)*alpha-lambda*_Z*q[3]-p[2])*lambda*_Z*q[2]+lambda(sqrt(x)*alpha-lambda*_Z*q[3]-p[2])*p[3]-p[1])

Is it possible to obtain a classical solution for the calculations above. (can not understand the meaning of: RootOf and _Z. I need q[1] in order to solve further in my system of eqautions for  q[2],  q[3]

 

could you help me please to find a solution for this issue...
I would like to thank you in advance 
Best regards,

D.L.

Hi,

I am doing calculation with binomial numbers with some parameters. Usually the result is correct, but this time a strange notation "table" appears. I do not know how does this happen?

Thank you!

Yan

 

By a straight forward calculation, one can check that the expressions

(2*delta^2-2*beta*delta+alpha^2-2*alpha*delta+beta^2)*N^2+2*gamma*(beta+alpha-2*delta)*N+2*gamma^2

 

and 

 

(N*beta-N*delta+gamma)^2+(N*(alpha-delta)+gamma)^2

 

are same and equal. 

How to get the 2nd expression from the 1st expression by simplification by using MAPLE. 

Here is my sheet. non_linear_P2_last_q.mw

In this problem I have achieved every thing what I aimed, thnaks to the wonderful people here!!!

I am looking for a way to do it in a more structured way meaning the calculation of Jacobian in the attached sheet is somewhat manuel, though I wonder does maple has some other way?

Hi,

I'm having a little trouble displaying the desired solution when using what might otherwise be refered to as the 'symbolic toolbox' - I'm a matlab user..

The output from maple is great! so much cleaner than matlab in this instance. The problem I'm having however is displaying the solution of simple algebra pproblems

ex: I would like to verify my handcalculation of cramers rule.

Given

I am trying to write a script that will read in vector files using ImportMatrix, perform a simple calculation then output a matrix file using ExportMatrix.

 

The difficulty I am having is that I would like to do this on a number of files,

eg.

for i from 1 to 600 do

Mi:=ImportMatrix(rowi):

do calc....

ExportMatrix(matrixi,Mi):

end do:

The variable i is in italics...

Hello everyone,

 

I am coding the assumed modes method for vibration analysis on maple and I don't know why but the code takes veeery long time to execute and give results and I think it should not. There is also anoter very annoying thing. every 3 or 4 executions maple freezes completely and I am not able to find the cause...

I would be gratefull if someone could explain me if in my case it's better to working in floating point or rational values,...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 1 of 18