Items tagged with complex complex Tagged Items Feed

A small piece of code for fun before the weekend, inspired by some recent posts:

http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2015/06/03/mystery-curve/

http://mathlesstraveled.com/2015/06/04/random-cyclic-curves-5/

http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=5677

 

cycler := proc(t, k, p, m, n, T) local expr, u, v;
  u := exp(k*I*t);
  expr := exp(I*t) * (1 - u/m + I*(u^(-p))/n);
  v := 1 + abs(1/n) + abs(1/m);
  plots:-complexplot( expr, t = 0 .. T, axes = none,
                      view = [-v .. v, -v .. v] );
end proc:

cycler(t, 5, 3, 2, 3, 2*Pi);

And that can be made into a small application (needs Maple 18 or 2015),

Explore( cycler(t, k, p, m, n, T),
         parameters = [ k = -10 .. 10, p = -10 .. 10,
                        m = -10.0 .. 10.0, n = -10.0 .. 10.0,
                        [ T = 0 .. 2*Pi, animate ] ],
         initialvalues = [ k = 5, p = 3, m = 2, n = 3, T = 2*Pi ],
         placement = left, animate = false, numframes = 100 );

cyclerapp.mw

The animation of parameter T from 0 to 2*Pi can also be fun if the view option is removed/disabled in the call to complexplot. (That could even be made a choice, by adding an additional argument for calling procedure cycler and an accompanying checkbox parameter on the exploration.)

acer

I want to solve the int((y4+by2+c)-1/2,y)-x and find y=h(x), where b and c are constants s.t. c>b2/4. Maple gives me complex Jacobi elliptic function as a result. But I am not sure that this integral has complex value. Am I doing something wrong or the result is really a complex valued function? Thanks.

Indeed my main question is: Plot y=y(u) where we have these two relations: int((y4+by2+c)-1/2,y)=x and find y=h(x). Then evaluate int((h(x)-B)-1/2,x)=u and find x=g(u). By using these relations plot y=y(u). :)

Here B is an arbitrary constant, but if necessary we can define a value for it. All the variables and constants are real.

I hope I manage to express myself. Thanks again.

 

Dear,

I have a perfectly working when all parameters are known (figure 1), however I want to perform a sensitivity analysis by derivating the code if one parameter is unknown. Because of multiple possible answers and because of the complexity of the formula, I cannot run this script and get solutions. Any ideas how I can this calculation lighter so it is able to run? Values should be real and positive (so 1 or 2 solutions are the only one I'm interested in)

Any ideas, how I can make this code runnable? (file is below)

I'm stuck on this for a while now :/ So I hope someone will be able to help me

Many thanks in advance!l

Question.mw

Figure 1: [URL=http://s1240.photobucket.com/user/laggstar/media/Parameter%20f%20known.png.html][IMG]http://i1240.photobucket.com/albums/gg494/laggstar/Parameter%20f%20known.png[/IMG][/URL]

 

Figure 2: [URL=http://s1240.photobucket.com/user/laggstar/media/Parameter%20f%20unknown.png.html][IMG]http://i1240.photobucket.com/albums/gg494/laggstar/Parameter%20f%20unknown.png[/IMG][/URL]

I have the following characteristic equation by use of maple. How do I find a condition on x, that will return real eigenvalues and complex eigenvalues?

 

 

 

If you have several results, e.g. one being real, the others complex. How can you choose?


G := 6.673*10^(-11):

M := 1.9891*10^30:

AU := 1.4959787066*10^11:

v := proc (R) options operator, arrow; 2332800000/(Pi*(R^3*AU^3/(G*M))^.5) end proc;

proc (R) options operator, arrow; 2332800000/(Pi*(R^3*AU^3/(G*M))^.5) end proc

(1)

a := solve(.601 = 60*(360*60)/(2*Pi*((R*AU)^3/(G*M))^.5)*3600, R);

39.26171595, -19.63085797+34.00164341*I, -19.63085797-34.00164341*I

(2)

op(1, a)

Error, invalid input: op expects 1 or 2 arguments, but received 4

 

``


Download Worksheet_CaseStudy.mw

Hi everyone,

at the suggestion of Carl I am making my question a post.

History:

Newbies often get fascinated with the power tower: x^x^x^...

The generalized power tower z^z^z^... is a special case of the Euler sequence:

z_{n+1}=c^z_n, for c\in C.

Like the Mandelbrot set: z_{n+1}=z^2-c, the power tower, often called infinite exponential, also has a general periodic map. It is included below and is taken from Daniel Geisler's site:
www.tetration.org

Shel and Thron proved that the infinite exponential conveges whenever c belongs to the red region, called today Shell-Thron region.

Definition of Julia Sets for the iterated exponential map:

Also like the Mandelbrot set, the infinite exponential admits Juila Sets. The Julia Sets of the infinite exponential however, are defined differently from the Julia Sets of the Mandelbrot set. They are defined to be  the closure of the periodic repellers of the Euler sequence . They are Cantor Bouquets.  Geisler's colored map then is a general map of how the corresponding Julia set behaves roughly, with c taken from the map. 

We can then introduce small cuts which go from the interior of the Shell-Thron region to the exterior, crossing at various angles, and this will tells us how the infinite exponential evolves. Generally speaking, each time one crosses the Shell-Thron boundary, one wittnesses what's called a Knaster explosion, wherein the exponential explodes into p subregions, where p is the pre-period of the multiplier.


When the parameter c exits the Shell-Thron region at angles of 2*Pi and Pi from the real axis (cuts right and left, p=1, 2), the infinite exponential either transitions from converging to a single feature to exploding into multiple indecomposable contiua (p=1), or it breaks into a period 2 bifurcation (p=2), which itself, also may explode into continua.

When it exits at angles 2*Pi/p, where p>2 is the preperiod of the multiplier, then the infinite exponential evolves from converging to a single feature, to exploding into  p major regions, called Fatou regions, each one having its own attractor, displaying a p-furcation.


In all cases,  the Knaster explosions may introduce the presence of indecomposable continua, as some Fatou regions end up covering entire parts of the complex plane after each transition. In the animations, Knaster explosions occur whenever the background is red. There may be more than one explosion present in the evolution of the power tower. 

Cantor Bouquets are strange creatures. They are essentially quantum sets, and no point of them is actually visible. The probability a point is visible varies directly with the area of the corresponding bouquet "finger" which is rendered in the area of interest. Devaney uses these "fingers"  to obtain "iteneraries" of the iterated exponential map.

Points "close"  to the fingers-hairs o the Cantor Bouquets escape towards complex infinity at (final) angles 2*Pi/p.

The "hairs" of a Cantor Bouquet are C^\infty curves, hence they can be termed easthetically pretty. Only hairs from the main Cantor bouquet for c=e^{1/e} are globally convex/concave. Every other bouquet may contain hairs which change curvature "unpredictably".

Inlcuded files:

1) Euler.mw

2) EulerAnimation.mw

3) EulerAnimation2_noaxes.mw

 

Code for static fractal with given parameters in 1). Parameters can be changed in the constant section (Try p=2,4 or Pi)

Code for morphing animations through cuts in the Shell-Thron region in 2). Parameters d1-d2, N

Code for zooming animations in 3). Parameters M, M1-M2,

Limitations:

Will show attractors of broken Fatou basins only up to pre-period p=5. No big deal though. If you want to increase the preperiod past p=5, you need to add the relavnt tests in procedure ppc(c), otherwise the new attractors are not calculated and the plot ends up red.

Colors are assigned a bit more dispersed, using ln(m). You can also use m in that place. It depends on which area you are in.

Basins of attraction and Fatou regions change appearance under different epsilons. If you want different shapes for the basins, you can try using the Manhattan metric in proc Jhf, instead of |z-lim|.

Included below are the main map of tetration by Daniel Geisler, a short excerpt of the Shell-Thron region which shows pre-periodic cuts and  6 morhing transitions, for p\in {1,2,3,4,5} and one which exits at the angle of 2 radians (p=Pi).

References:

More than 300. To be published with my thesis. Patches, problems and code corrections in the original question page:

http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/203593-Maple-13-Fast-Maple-18-Crawling

Hi,

I got the Real and Imaginary of an expression J1 

assume(d,real):

Gamma:=0.04:tau:=10*Pi:j:=0:

J1:=(exp((1-I*d)*Gamma*tau)-1)/((1-I*d));

J1mod:=simplify((Re(J1))^2+(Im(J1))^2): (I works here this amont is real)

################

but when I change the expression  for J1 to be

J1:=((2*e^(-2^(-j-1)*(1-I*d))-e^(-2^(-j)*(1-I*d))-1)*exp((1-I*d)*Gamma*tau)-1)/((1-I*d)):

J1mod:=simplify((Re(J1))^2+(Im(J1))^2): 

J1mod here is complex(I dont know why? it doesnt separate the real and the im )

Any comments will help

Thanks

Hi,

I need you help to understand this problem.

 

Let alpha=0.1.;

When I do :  (-0.2)^alpha I get a complex number.

 

I must find a real number.

What's the problem

Thanks for your idea.

 

Hi all.

I try to get the real part from the complex expression. But it turns out to not be the simplest result:

A:=I*sin(k*Pi*(x-h*cos(theta))/a)*sin(l*Pi*(y-h*sin(theta))/b)*exp(-I*k[0]*h)*sin(k*Pi*x/a)*sin(l*Pi*y/b)

convert(exp(-I*k[0]*h), sin);

simplify(Re(A));

Maple results in:

Re(sin(k*Pi*(-x+h*cos(theta))/a)*sin(l*Pi*(-y+h*sin(theta))/b)*exp(-I*k[0]*h)*sin(k*Pi*x/a)*sin(l*Pi*y/b))

while the simplified result should be:

sin(k*Pi*(x-h*cos(theta))/a)*sin(l*Pi*(y-h*sin(theta))/b)*sin(k*Pi*x/a)*sin(l*Pi*y/b)*sin(k[0]*h)

 

I wander how to get the simplifyed result in maple. Thanks

Solve IVP with complex coef. with compplex varables numerically..

the sys. is x'=-iDelta1x(t)+y(t)+epsilon

y'=-iDelta2y(t)+x(t)z(t)

z'=-2(x*(t)y(t)+x(t)y*(t)), where * means complex conjugate 

I solve it as:

epsilon:=5:Delta1:=4:Delta2:=4:assume(z(t),real):

var:={x_R(t),y_R(t),z_R(t),x_I(t),y_I(t),z_I(t)}:
dsys :={diff(x(t),t)=-I*Delta1*x(t)+y(t)+epsilon, diff(y(t),t)=-I*Delta2*y(t)+x(t)*z(t), diff(z(t),t)=-2*(conjugate(x(t))*y(t)+conjugate(y(t))*x(t))}:
functions := indets(dsys, anyfunc(identical(t))):
redefinitions := map(f -> f = cat(op(0, f), _R)(t) + I*cat(op(0,f), _I)(t), functions):
newsys := map(evalc @ Re, redefinitions) union map(evalc @ Im, redefinitions):

incs := {x_R(0)=0, x_I(0)=0, y_R(0)=0, y_I(0)=0,z_R(0)=-1/2, z_I(0)=0}:
dsol1 :=dsolve({newsys,incs},var,numeric, output=listprocedure, abserr=1e-9, relerr=1e-8,range=0..1):

but it seems there is not runing propebly

 

If we a complex number in Maple, like for example:

I*b+a+x+I*y+I^2*c

 

How can we make maple rewrite it like this?

a+x-c+I*(y+b)

 

I tried using the comands Re(%) and Im(%) but Re just gives the whole expression again and Im gives 0.

I have been having problems with using the BodePlot function with units:

 

R1 := 18.2*10^3*Unit('Omega');

R2 := 10^3*Unit('Omega');

C1 := 470*10^(-12)*Unit('F');

C2 := 4.7*10^(-9)*Unit('F');

# wo is in hertz

wo := 1/sqrt(R1*R2*C1*C2);

# Q is unitless

Q := wo*R1*R2*C2/(R1+R2)

 

with(DynamicSystems);

sys := TransferFunction(wo^2/(s^2+wo*s/Q+wo^2));

 

This is the error message I got:

Error, (in Units:-Standard:-+) the units `1` and `Hz` have incompatible dimensions

 

I think the problem is that the BodePlot function doesn't expect 'wo' to have units.  

So I tried to work around the issue by using the loglogplot but it doesn't seem to like 

complex function even when I used abs to find the magnitude (with or without units).

 

 Any workaround is appreciated.

I was just wondering if there is such thing as a technique for solving integrals using a PFD(partial fraction decomposition) if the denominator's rational roots are complex numbers???

Hi all,

I am stuck with the following problem:

convert(cos(alpha), exp); works fine for me.

Once I have the trigonometric functions in a matrix, it does not work any more:

In the latter line, A keeps the trigonometric functions. Why is this the case? Is there any way to force maple to keep the complex exponentials instead of trigonometric functions?

 

I am using LinearAlgebra and VectorCalculus.

 

Best Regards

Wassja

Hello,

first of all, this is my very fist question in this forum, so please excuse some formal mistakes I may make...

Using Maple 18.01 on Windows 7 64bit

To the topic: I want to calculate the eigenvalues of a complex matrix like this (just as an example):

M := Matrix(2, 2, {(1, 1) = a+2.5*I, (1, 2) = 1-I*a, (2, 1) = 4, (2, 2) = a})

When I try to calculate

Eigenvalues(M)

I get

Error, (in LinearAlgebra:-Eigenvalues) expecting either Matrices of rationals, rational functions, radical functions, algebraic numbers, or algebraic functions, or Matrices of complex(numeric) values

Strange, because if I replace the "2.5" with just "2", so an integer instead of a float, I get results:

I don't understand this strange behavior, since Mathematica i.e. calculates everything just fine...:

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 1 of 26