Items tagged with convert convert Tagged Items Feed

Hi all

I have  a simple question in export as eps format in Maple. i want the converted eps file with no box, but when i use export as eps by right click on plotted figure in Maple and then select " Export As--> Encapsulated PostScript(EPS)...", the below mentioned box(as in sample attached picture) will appear. How can I remove it? The Sample picture is attached. 

will be grateful of any guidance.

Thanks in advance

Mahmood   Dadkhah

Ph.D Candidate

Applied Mathematics Department

Hello!

 

If I type this into a CAS calculator from Texas, I get the right result for Uc wich is 545.2.

solve(Uc∠-90=400∠X-150∠0+j*174.4,Uc,X)

This is used in AC circuits.

However, in Maple I'm using polar coordinates, so Im using this preamble:

phasor := proc (r, theta) options operator, arrow; r*cos(convert(theta*degrees, radians))+I*r*sin(convert(theta*degrees, radians)) end proc

This basically means that I can write phasor(value,angle in degrees) and get the lenth and angle of a vector on the complex plane.

Basically I want to know how I can make Maple solve this:

evalf(solve({phasor(U__C, -90) = phasor(400, X)-phasor(150, 0)+phasor(174.4, 90)}, {Uc, X})) Where I'm just interested in U_C , X doesn't matter.

I can't figure out how to do this with my current preamble. Does anyone know how to make this work?

I run the following working maplet:

 

 

Where "muutujad" is a procedure I defined and which returns the three inputs in the form [TF1,TF2,TF3].

It works fine, but if I insert "theta" as input, it of course stays in the string form, not Θ. Even if I copy the symbol and paste it in the textfied, it doesn't accept the symbol. Is there any way I can convert the text input to actual symbol?

I have a vector of dimension n with each component being an equation of a linear system.

Can maple convert this Vector to a Matrix-Vector form with the matrix being constant coefficients?

Hello to all

 

I am Jorge Gracia an exchange student working on my Thesis.

I started working with maple recently, and I am having some problems to achieve the results that I am looking for.

My work consist in the next Steps.

Using maple and taking some fatigue tests data, create a wav file with the some of the following formats:

Supported data formats are wave type 1 (PCM integer Data 8 Bit unsigned, 16 Bit signed or 32 Bit

signed) and wave type 3 (PCM float data (32 Bit IEEE float).

 

In the same way, if I already have a wav file, read the values of every point of the wave in order to understand and study the results.

 

If I have a normal plot, convert it into a wav file plot with the formats from above

With all the results, I will be able to work with this wav files in a fatigue test machine achieving more realistic results than with the standard waves.

 

All the information about this will be welcome.

 

Thank you for all.

Does anyone know an easy way to convert %d_ to D? I tried the convert command, but no effect.  Thanks.

 

Michael

we can get the continued fraction of cot(x) with the command

> convert(cot(x), confrac, x, 6)

the result is

(1+x^2/(-3+x^2/(5-(1/7)*x^2)))/x

 convert(cot(x), confrac, x, 6)

how could I convert this result to a form like

1/x-(1/10)*x+49*x/(20*x^2-210)

 

 

Is there a way to convert this FDTD code into Maple

Hy(1 to M)=0;

Ex(1 to M+1)=0;

For t=1 to T,

Ex(1)=exp(-t);

For k=1 to M,

Hy(k)=Hy(k)-(Ex(k+1)-Ex(k));

end

For k=2 to M,

Ex(k)=Ex(k)-(Hy(k)-Hy(k-1));

end

end

Thanks in advance.

In Maple 11 we have:

> A := <a,b,c>:
> a := 1:  b := 2: c := 3:
> convert(A, list);
                                   [1, 2, 3]

In Maple 2015 we have:

> A := <a,b,c>:
> a := 1:  b := 2: c := 3:
> convert(A, list);
                                   [a, b, c]

Is that change really intended?

Hello,

 

In a course I am looking at, the system of units is mostly in FPS.  Wich I never use.  But they ask sometime to convert it to SI.  But with Maple, I have a problem:

For Force, it use lb that I cannot convert into N

So what unit should I use to convert FPS to SI for the force.

 

I know that slug*ft*s^(-2) convert to N with no problem.

 

Thank you for your help.

 

 

--------------------------------------
Mario Lemelin
Maple 2015 Ubuntu 14.04 - 64 bits
Maple 2015 Win 7 - 64 bits messagerie : mario.lemelin@cgocable.ca téléphone :  (819) 376-0987

Maple is providing answers with the gamma function and LambertW function.  I am not a math major.  Although I did take advanced engineering mathematics in grad school, I am not familiar with transcendental functions.  

I did look at some of the help.  I tried to use the convert command to convert to elementary functions, however it did not help.  I looked at the definition for the Gamma function, GAMMA(z), and the upper incomplete Gamma function, GAMMA(a,z) that uses the generalized hypergeometric function 1F1.  Looking at the generalized hypergeometric function 1F1 defintion, hypergeom(n, d, z), it references the general pochhammer function, pochhammer(z, a), and product functions, product(f,k=m..n).  This all seems way too complicated.  

 

eqn1:= R = exp(t/MTBF) * (t/MTBF) * sum(1/(i!), i=0..n);

exp(t/MTBF) * (t/MTBF) * Sum(1/(i!), i=0..n)

exp(t/MTBF) * (t/MTBF) * sum(1/(i!), i=0..n)

 

eqn2:= MTBF = solve(eqn1,MTBF);

solve(R = exp(t/MTBF) * (t/MTBF) * sum(1/(i!), i=0..n),MTBF)

 

Is there any easy way to convert to use basic functions like sum, int, etc.??

I am wanting to use the answer in Excel.  I have found some custom Excel VBA code that I could use to implement these non-standard function in Excel, but that seems like a lot of effort.

Lambert W function for Excel, work on real and complex number (VBForums)

Excel Add-Ins Incomplete Gamma Function (PC Review)

 

Update: Some more background on the problem is as follows. R is the expected reliability say 90%. MTBF is mean time between failures in hours. t is the time period of operation excluding allowable downtime. n is the allowed number of failures. I am looking to find the MTBF needed to achieve a certain required reliability, with the number of failures allowed, and the up-time operational period, being defined by the requirements as well.

To clarify the simplification does not necessarily have to be closed form, and an approximation would be acceptable. (in Excel I currently am using iteration over a number of rows, then using the Goal Seek tool to find the MTBF, however this is less than desirable to have to do everytime when looking at different trade studies) I am not that familiar with how to use assumptions in Maple, and do not know what would be the appropriate assumptions to make when simplifying. Thanks for your help.

At the first note that in this question all polynomials have parametric coefficients. Let F be a list of polynomials and f be a polynomial. I want to convert F and f into a linear homogeneous FF and ff resp. At the first I want to sortvthe monomials appears in F and f  w.r.t. a monomial order T and then replace by the new variables A_i.

For example if

and

(a,b,c are parameters and x,y,z are variables) then I want to convert F and f into FF and ff resp:

please note that the variables appears in F and f are:

where sorted by T=plex(x,y,z). Please note that we consider all constants and alone parameters (4, b-4, c-1) as A9. I want to convert v into

and then F into FF and f into ff.

 

How to express sin(-(1/6)*Pi+(1/2)*arccos(1/3)) in radicals with Maple? The use of the applyrule command is not desired. Here is one of  my tries:
>convert(expand(sin(-(1/6)*Pi+(1/2)*arccos(1/3))), radical);
-(1/2)*cos((1/2)*arccos(1/3))+(1/2)*sqrt(3)*sin((1/2)*arccos(1/3))

Hello,

please help check what's wrong with this code. I need the analytic solution and convert to Bessel but return error. Here is the worksheet ID_1.mw

Best regards.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 3 of 42