Items tagged with equation

Feed

I want to solve maximize of equation,but the maximize failed to solve it,who can help me.thanks.

c[1] := (1/8)*w*{(1/((x+y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+y)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(x^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(y^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(z^2+1))^(3/2)+1}+(1/8)*{x/((x+y+z)^2+1)+x/((x+y)^2+1)+x/((x+z)^2+1)+x/(x^2+1)}:

c[2] := (1/8)*w*{(1/((x+y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+y)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(x^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(y^2+1))^(3/2)+[1/(z^2+1)]^(3/2)+1}+(1/8)*{y/((x+y+z)^2+1)+y/((x+y)^2+1)+y/((y+z)^2+1)+y/(y^2+1)}:

t[1] := diff(c[1], x);

(1/8)*w*{-(3/2)*(1/((x+y+z)^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/((x+y)^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/((x+z)^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*z)/((x+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(x^2+1))^(1/2)*x/(x^2+1)^2}+(1/8)*{1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-x*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-x*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((x+z)^2+1)-x*(2*x+2*z)/((x+z)^2+1)^2+1/(x^2+1)-2*x^2/(x^2+1)^2}

(1)

t[2] := diff(c[2], y);

(1/8)*w*{-(3/2)*(1/((x+y+z)^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/((x+y)^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/((y+z)^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2}+(1/8)*{1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2}

(2)

eliminate({t[1], t[2]}, w);

[{w = -{1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2}/{-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2}}, {{1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-x*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-x*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((x+z)^2+1)-x*(2*x+2*z)/((x+z)^2+1)^2+1/(x^2+1)-2*x^2/(x^2+1)^2}*{-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2}-{1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2}*{-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*z)/((x+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(x^2+1))^(1/2)*x/(x^2+1)^2}}]

(3)

w = -(1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2)/(-(3/2)*sqrt(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*sqrt(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*sqrt(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*sqrt(1/(y^2+1))*y/(y^2+1)^2);

w = -(1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2)/(-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2)

(4)

sub(w = -(1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2)/(-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2), c[1]);

sub(w = -(1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2)/(-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2), (1/8)*w*{(1/((x+y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+y)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(x^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(y^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(z^2+1))^(3/2)+1}+(1/8)*{x/((x+y+z)^2+1)+x/((x+y)^2+1)+x/((x+z)^2+1)+x/(x^2+1)})

(5)

subs(w = -(1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2)/(-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2), c[2]);

-(1/8)*(1/((x+y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2+1/((x+y)^2+1)-y*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2+1/((y+z)^2+1)-y*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2+1/(y^2+1)-2*y^2/(y^2+1)^2)*{(1/((x+y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+y)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((x+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/((y+z)^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(x^2+1))^(3/2)+(1/(y^2+1))^(3/2)+[1/(z^2+1)]^(3/2)+1}/(-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+2*x*z+y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y+2*z)/((x+y+z)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(x^2+2*x*y+y^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*x+2*y)/((x+y)^2+1)^2-(3/2)*(1/(y^2+2*y*z+z^2+1))^(1/2)*(2*y+2*z)/((y+z)^2+1)^2-3*(1/(y^2+1))^(1/2)*y/(y^2+1)^2)+(1/8)*{y/((x+y+z)^2+1)+y/((x+y)^2+1)+y/((y+z)^2+1)+y/(y^2+1)}

(6)

"#"Iwant to maximize the equation (5)and (6),under the conditon of x,y,z are negative or positive at the same time.

 

NULL

 

Download maximize.mw

Could anyone assist in rectifying this error ''Error, (in fsolve) {f[1], f[2], f[3], f[4], f[5], f[6], f[7], f[8], f[9], f[10], f[11], theta[11]} are in the equation, and are not solved for''. Here is the worksheet FDM_Revisit_1.mw

Dear all;

I need your help to get all the solution of this nonlinear  system  with four parameters: r1, r2, q1, q2  assumed to be positives. Let the system:

the first equation is: r1*x*(1-x/q1)=x*y/(1+x)

the second equation: r2*y*(exp(-y)-q2)=-x*y/(1+x)

How can get the positive solution ( x, y) of the previous system.

Thank you for your help.

Hello people in mapleprimes,

I want to solve the next system of equation for B/A and C/A.

eq1:=A+B=F+G;
eq2:=k*(A-B)=kappa*(F-G);
eq3:=F*exp(I*kappa*a)+G*exp(-I*kappa*a)=C*exp(I*k*a);
eq4:=kappa*F*exp(I*kappa*a)-kappa*G*exp(-I*kappa*a)=k*C*exp(I*k*a);


But, though it is well-known, solve({eq1,eq2,eq3,eq4},{B/A,C/A})
does not work well, as the values I want to solve it for are
expressions: B/A and C/A not variables.

Then, you might thing the next works well.
eq:=subs({B=A/t,C=A/u},{eq1,eq2,eq3,eq4}):
solve(eq,{t,u});

But, this doesn't work well, with the answer was
only the ratio of t and u expressed as the following:

t = t, u = exp(I*k*a)*(exp(-I*kappa*a)*k^2-exp(I*kappa*a)*k^2-exp(-I*kappa*a)*kappa^2+exp(I*kappa*a)*kappa^2)*t/(4*kappa*k*exp(I*kappa*a)*exp(-I*kappa*a))

Isn't there nice way to solve the above system of equation, except that
sol1:=solve({eq3,eq4},{F,G});assign(sol1);
sol2:=solve({eq1,eq2},{A,B});assign(sol2);

Best wishes
taro

hello, i went solve these equation ,with a & b take any value

b*x*ln(x)-x*ln(a)+a=0

thank you

Hello all,

I have the following equation:

N*exp(-(1/2)*eta*epsilon*(N*alpha*epsilon*w+2*N*w*C[max]-alpha*epsilon*z-2*Q1*alpha)/(w*N))*S1*upsilon*w-N*S1*upsilon*w+K1^2*alpha*eta*z*epsilon+K1*alpha*eta*z*epsilon*S1 = 0

in which I need to find solution for epsilon (analytical solution) when epsilon>0.  

Thanks,

Dmitry

 

I have a nonlinear system with 4 equations and 4 unknowns. I am using fsolve. I know that there are multiple solutions for each variable but am only getting one. I need the others. what do I do??

This is my code:

R__1 := Matrix([[1, 0] , [0, 1] ]);

R__2 := Matrix([[1/2, sqrt(3)/2] , [-sqrt(3)/2, 1/2] ]);

R__3 := Matrix([[-1/2, sqrt(3)/2] , [-sqrt(3)/2, -1/2] ]);

R__4 := Matrix([[-1, 0] , [0, -1] ]);

R__5 := Matrix([[-1/2, -sqrt(3)/2] , [sqrt(3)/2, -1/2] ]);

 

d__1 := Vector( [ 0, 5.4] );

d__2 := Vector( [ 6.4, 4.539] );

d__3 := Vector( [ 11, 4.078] );

d__4 := Vector( [ 15.5, 2.079] );

d__5 := Vector( [ 19, 1.039] );

 

a := Vector( [ a__x, a__y] );

 

A__1:=R__1.a+d__1;

A__2:=R__2.a+d__2;

A__3:=R__3.a+d__3;

A__4:=R__4.a+d__4;

A__5:=R__5.a+d__5;

 

OO:=Vector([O__x,O__y]);

 

DA1:=A__2.A__2-A__1.A__1-2*(A__2-A__1).OO;

DA2:=A__3.A__3-A__1.A__1-2*(A__3-A__1).OO;

DA3:=A__4.A__4-A__1.A__1-2*(A__4-A__1).OO;

DA4:=A__5.A__5-A__1.A__1-2*(A__5-A__1).OO;

 

fsolve({DA1,DA2,DA3,DA4},{a__x,a__y,O__x,O__y});

Thanks for any tips you may be able to offer

 

       

 

 

What’s the simplest way to solve an algebraic equation in the complex domain?

 

For example,

 

I*(a+3*b)+2*b+5*a = 3+2*I

 

where a and b are real numbers.

 

 

I'm trying to solve a series of equations and then graph them. I'm trying to solve for the variables involved:

values := solve({eq1, eq2, eq3, eq4, eq5, eq6, eq7, eq8, eq9,

eq10, eq11, eq12, eq13, eq14, eq15, eq16}, {a, b, b, c, d, e, f,

g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p});

 

. . . but it gives me this:

Warning, solving for expressions other than names or functions is not recommended. 

values := 

  Given this equation:       (chi^2*(xi^2-1)^2+1-Omega^2)*(xi^2-Omega^2)-xi^2 = 0

   chi^2=1/1200;  I want to plot xi vs Omega. Can anyone help me out?

Hi!

I am new to Maple and have a problem I've been struggling with all day.

I have a pendulum and need to find a equation of motion in the y-direction. Please find my code in the picture below.

I can see that my problem starts at Eqy where the differentiation deletes one of the right-hand-side parts because I don't have any function y(t), and Maple thinks y(t) a constant (?)
Can somebody please tell me what I'm doing wrong?

 

Thank you in advance!


Hello,

I have been trying to compute the analytical solution of two dimensional diffusion equation with zero neumann boundary conditions (no-flux) in polar coordinates using the solution in Andrei Polyanin's book. When I use 2d Gaussian function as initial condition, i cannot get the result. If I use some nicer function like f(r,phi)=1-r; there is no problem.  

Any idea why this happens? or any suggestion to compute the analytical solution?

Thanks!

HB 

M := Matrix([[3.83170597020751, 7.01558666981561, 10.1734681350627, 13.3236919363142, 16.4706300508776], [1.84118378134065, 5.33144277352503, 8.53631636634628, 11.7060049025920, 14.8635886339090], [3.05423692822714, 6.70613319415845, 9.96946782308759, 13.1703708560161, 16.3475223183217], [4.20118894121052, 8.01523659837595, 11.3459243107430, 14.5858482861670, 17.7887478660664], [5.31755312608399, 9.28239628524161, 12.6819084426388, 15.9641070377315, 19.1960288000489], [6.41561637570024, 10.5198608737723, 13.9871886301403, 17.3128424878846, 20.5755145213868], [7.50126614468414, 11.7349359530427, 15.2681814610978, 18.6374430096662, 21.9317150178022], [8.57783648971407, 12.9323862370895, 16.5293658843669, 19.9418533665273, 23.2680529264575], [9.64742165199721, 14.1155189078946, 17.7740123669152, 21.2290626228531, 24.5871974863176], [10.7114339706999, 15.2867376673329, 19.0045935379460, 22.5013987267772, 25.8912772768391], [11.7708766749555, 16.4478527484865, 20.2230314126817, 23.7607158603274, 27.1820215271905]]):

c := 10:

A := 5:

w := proc (r, phi, t) options operator, arrow; int(int(f(xi, eta)*G(r, phi, xi, eta, t)*xi, xi = 0 .. 5), eta = 0 .. 2*Pi) end proc:

with(plots):

Warning,  computation interrupted

 

``



Download 2d_soln.mw

Hi there,

 

I'd like to solve 7th order implicit simultaneous equation such as below, so I tried to do it by solve command.

However the calculation wasn't over although three hours passed.

 

eq1 := f1(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) = 0;

eq2 := f2(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) = 0;

.

.

.

eq7 := f7(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) = 0;

 

Just for your information, the eq1 and eq6 are written as follows specifically.

eq1 := -a-b-c-d-e-f-g+0.501857 = 0

eq6 := a*b*c*d*e*f+a*b*c*d*e*g+a*b*c*d*f*g+a*b*c*e*f*g+a*b*d*e*f*g+a*c*d*e*f*g+b*c*d*e*f*g+a*b*c*d*e+a*b*c*d*f+a*b*c*d*g+a*b*c*e*f+a*b*c*e*g+a*b*c*f*g+a*b*d*e*f+a*b*d*e*g+a*b*d*f*g+a*b*e*f*g+a*c*d*e*f+a*c*d*e*g+a*c*d*f*g+a*c*e*f*g+a*d*e*f*g+b*c*d*e*f+b*c*d*e*g+b*c*d*f*g+b*c*e*f*g+b*d*e*f*g+c*d*e*f*g-0.5281141885e-3+1.01894577*10^(-12)*I = 0

 

And the program code I used is:

solve([eq1,eq2,eq3,eq4,eq5,eq6,eq7],[a,b,c,d,e,f,g]);

 

Here is the specification of my computer.

OS: Windows 7 Enterprise 64bit

CPU: Intel Core i7-3520M 2.90 GHz

Memory: 4.00 GB

 

How can I handle this problem? Is the specification not enough to solve the equation? Do I need to leave my computer more and more time?

Any help would be appriciated.

Hi there. 

I'm kind of new to Maple and i'm trying to solve a Linear Algebra problem for my class of Linear Algebra of the course of Physics. Also, my first language is portuguese so forgive for my not-so-perfect english.

I have a (solved) linear system of 7 equations and 12 variables (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L) that is the following:

  • A = 33 - K - L
  • B = 1 + F - J
  • C = -15 - F + J + K + L
  • D = 15 + H - K
  • E = 16 - F - H + J + K
  • G = 34 - H - J - L
  • I = 18 - J - K

Note: I'm using letters (A, B, ..., L) instead of X1X2, ..., X12 because it's easier to write it like this here and because I don't know if the Xn notation is allowed on Maple (i don't think so).

So, the system is possible but undetermined (with 5 degrees of freedom), being F, H, J, K and L the free variables.

Until here, everything's fine. The problem arises when the professor asks us for every solution of the system that satisfies the condition that all the variables (form A to L) are positive integers (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L ϵ IN → natural numbers).

From my understanding, that gives rise to a system of linear inequalities with 12 variables and the following inequalities:

  • A = 33 - K - L > 0
  • B = 1 + F - J > 0
  • C = -15 - F + J + K + L > 0
  • D = 15 + H - K > 0
  • E = 16 - F - H + J + K > 0
  • G = 34 - H - J - L > 0
  • I = 18 - J - K > 0
  • > 0
  • > 0
  • > 0
  • > 0
  • > 0                            (and A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L ϵ IN)



After some research, i found that a possible way to solve this type of system of linear inequalities is trough a method of elimination (analog to Gauss-Jordan's elimination method for systems of linear equations) named Fourier-Motzkin. But it's hardwork and i wanted to do it on the computer. After some research, i came across with the following Maple command:

SolveTools[Inequality][LinearMultivariateSystem]

http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=SolveTools%2fInequality%2fLinearMultivariateSystem

So, I tried to use that command to solve my system, with the following result (or non-result):

with(SolveTools[Inequality]);
LinearMultivariateSystem({F > 0, H > 0, J > 0, K > 0, L > 0, 1+F-J > 0, 15+H-K > 0, 18-J-K > 0, 33-K-L > 0, 34-H-J-L > 0, -15-F+J+K+L > 0, 16-F-H+J+K > 0}, [F, H, J, K, L]);

Error, (in SolveTools:-Inequality:-Piecewise) piecewise takes at least 2 parameters


So, i really need help solving this as the professor told us that the first one to solve would win a book, eheh. I don't know what I'm doing wrong. Maybe this Maple command is not made for 12 variables? Or maybe i'm just writing something on a wrong form. I've never used Maple before so i can be doing something really stupid without knowing it.

I would really apreciate an answer, as my only goal as a future physicist is to unveil the secrets of the Cosmos to us all.

Thank you again.

Miguel Jesus





5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Last Page 7 of 21