I had to use integration by parts to get the answer I need, but I do not think it is really needed for this. compare the output from:
(which is pages of very complicated output), with this:
Does one really have to tell Maple to do integration by parts for this? I would have expected int() to do it as is.
Please compare to Mathematica:
The reason I think this should have been done by int() directly is that it is direct application of the power rule of integration. I can't write Latex here, so I wrote it on my computer, and I copy the screen shot to explain for those interested:
Maple is so good in differential equations, but does not seem to be as good as it should when it comes to integration.