Items tagged with maple maple Tagged Items Feed

We have issued an update to correct a problem a small number of Mac and 64-bit Linux users have experienced when doing certain types of floating point computations on very recent hardware (such as this report on MaplePrimes: http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/201815-Problem-Loading-MKL-In-Maple-18). When the problem occurs, instead of giving the result, Maple issues a “lost kernel connection” error message and must be restarted.

While this issue does not occur on most computers, we recommend that all Maple 18 customers running on Mac or 64-bit Linux install this update to ensure they do not encounter this problem. This update can be safely applied to any Mac or 64-bit Linux computer. Windows and 32-bit Linux users do not need, and cannot install, this update.

To get this update, you can use Tools>Check for Updates from within Maple, or visit Maple 18.01a Downloads.

 

eithne

Hello Maple-Primers!

I am trying to evaluate a system at many different points.  I would like to include an interpolation function in this system, but have thusfar been unsuccessful.

Usually, I solve a system symbolically by using eliminate and unapply:

eq[1] := A = M^3;
eq[2] := C = A*2;
eq[3] := D = N+3;
eq[4] := B = piecewise(A = 0, 0,C);
eq[5] := E = B*D;
elimsol:=eliminate(convert(eq,list),[A,B,C,D,E])[1];

unappsol:=unapply(elimsol,[N,M]);

unappsol(1,2);
{A = 8, B = 16, C = 16, D = 4, E = 64} <--- great!

Now, I want to include an interpolation function in the system of equations.  They look like this (see worksheet for actual interpolation function):

B_interp := (W,T) -> CurveFitting:-ArrayInterpolation([FC_Map_W,FC_Map_T],FC_Map,Array(1 .. 1, 1 .. 1, 1 .. 2, [[[W, T]]]),method=linear);

eq[5] := E = B_interp(N,M);

Error, (in CurveFitting:-ArrayInterpolation) invalid input: coordinates of xvalues must be of type numeric <-- bad!

Anyone have any ideas?  I've tried to use polynomials, but I can't seem to get a fit close enough for my purposes.

Maple_2D_Interpolate_FC.mw

Greetings,

       I am new to Maple and this forum. I would like to obtain a Jacobian of a system of 12 ODEs. What have I done wrongly with my code?

eq_1 := -B*a+A-V*(c+d+t+s+h)*a/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-W*(b+d)*a/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v);
eq_2 := W*(b+d)*a/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-V*(c+d+t+s+h)*b/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(F*G+B+D)*b;
eq_3 := V*(c+d+t+s+h)*a/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-W*(b+d)*c/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(B+E+C)*c;
eq_4 := V*(c+d+t+s+h)*b/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)+W*(b+d)*c/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(B+C+D+F)*d;
eq_5 := G*F*b-V*(c+d+t+s+h)*e/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(B+H)*e;
eq_6 := H*e-V*(c+d+t+s+h)*f/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(B+S)*f;
eq_7 := S*f-V*(c+d+t+s+h)*g/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-B*g;
eq_8 := V*(c+d+t+s+h)*g/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)+S*s-(B+E+C)*h;
eq_9 := F*d+V*(c+d+t+s+h)*e/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(B+C+H+T)*t;
eq_10 := H*t+V*(c+d+t+s+h)*f/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(U+B+C+S+S)*s;
eq_11 := T*t+W*(b+d)*x/(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+s+t+u+v)-(B+H+Y)*u;
eq_12 := U*s-(B+S)*v+H*u-Y*H*v/(H+S);
with(linalg);
J := Jacobian([eq_1, eq_2, eq_3, eq_4, eq_5, eq_6, eq_7, eq_8, eq_9, eq_10, eq_11, eq_12], [a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, s, t, u, v]);

I am getting the message: 

 Vector(4, {(1) = ` 12 x 12 `*Matrix, (2) = `Data Type: `*anything, (3) = `Storage: `*rectangular, (4) = `Order: `*Fortran_order})

Thanks!!

Hello,

       I am new to this forum. I have typed the follwing code in Maple17:

restart; eq1 := A-B*a-V*a*q/z-W*(b+d)*a/z = 0; eq2 := W*(b+d)*a/z-V*b*q/z-(F*G+B+D)*b = 0; eq3 := V*a*q/z-W*c(b+d)/z-(B+C+E)*c = 0; eq4 := V*b*q/z+W*(b+d)*c/z-(B+C+D+F)*d = 0; eq5 := G*F*b-V*q*e/z-(B+H)*e = 0; eq6 := H*e-V*q*f/z-(B+S)*f = 0; eq7 := S*f-V*q*g/z-B*g = 0; eq8 := V*q*g/z+S*s-(B+C+E)*h = 0; eq9 := F*d+V*q*e/z-(B+C+H+T)*t = 0; eq10 := H*t+V*q*f/z-(U+B+C+2*S)*s = 0; eq11 := T*t+W*(b+d)*x/z-(B+H+Y)*u = 0; eq12 := U*s-(B+S)*v+H*u-Y*H*v/(H+S) = 0; eq13 := g-c-d-t-s-h = 0; eq14 := z-a-b-c-d-e-f-g-h-s-t-u-v = 0; soln := solve({eq1, eq10, eq11, eq12, eq13, eq14, eq2, eq3, eq4, eq5, eq6, eq7, eq8, eq9}, {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, q, s, t, u, v, z});

 

This is to symbolically solve a nonlinear system of (14) equations. But when I press Enter, it just returns the message "Ready". Shouldn't it say "Evaluating"?

I don't see anything syntactically wrong with my code...

Hi All

Assume that we have:

and the hybrid function with block pulses with the following form:

if we want to introduce this form to maple so that we can do:

then how can we do this????

especially if we want to approximate t or t^2 or sin(3*t) by mentioned form, how maple can help us?

 

thanks a lot for coming answers 

Mahmood   Dadkhah

Ph.D Candidate

Applied Mathematics Department

We know that the set f:={(1,2),(2,a),(3,b)} can introduce a function from {1,2,3} to {2,a,b}. I want Maple to know f as a function. Is this job possible at Maple? I thought to find the Cartesian product of above latter sets and then try to select "f" as one of its subset but this did not help me to force Maple to take "f" as a function. Indeed, I want to work with this kind of function (like plotting and doing f+g, f-g, fog for two functions for example).

Thanks for your time and help.

 

Hi all,

i have the following problem:

i had create this tiny procedure to compute the berstein base elements:

Berstein base

And so i would like print space, between B(i,n,t) and the formula corresponing, without quotes :D

In other word i would an output like this:

B(i,n,t),      ,(formula)

 

Thank you in advance :)

     

 

 

Hi all,

my problem concerns operation with complex number in Maple 18. The issue is the following:

i define this complex: c:=a+i*b

then i compute the square: sort(evalc(c^2))

and the output is: a^2+2*i*ab-b^2

So, how can i obtain an output like the following?  a^2-b^2b^2 +a*i*ab

In other word i want an output where the real part precede the complex part.

thank you in advance :)

hi every one,i want to know what are the maple strentgh compraed to matlab and mathematica ? why someone should choose maple instead of these both ? i searched the net,but nothing useful has been found , tnx in advance .

Hello those in Mapleprimes,

 

What I want to know is whether this is possible or not, and if possible, how should I write a code?

 

The following code works properly:

 

U:=(x,y)->(x^theta+y^theta+X)^(1/theta);

diff(U(x,y),x)/diff(U(x,y),y)=p/q;simplify(%);

But, what I want to ask is this. As for the part of simplify(%), I want to do it with a way which has me 

feel more being from the former to latter.

That is, if ,for example, "diff(U(x,y),x)/diff(U(x,y),y)=p/q;@simplify;" works, it is better to me, though this does not work.

As the second part, @simplify, receives the result of the first part"diff(U(x,y),x)/diff(U(x,y),y)", it seems more 

natural to me than to write simplify(%).

 

Can't I do this, in a meaning, reversal of operator to argument?

 

taro

Hello those in Mapleprimes,

 

I want to know whether there is a good way to modify the first expression to the second one below.

first expression: 

> p+p^(-1/(theta-1))*sum(q[i]^(theta/(theta-1)), i = (1 .. n));

second expression:

> p^(-1/(theta-1))*(p^(theta/(theta-1))+sum(q[i]^(theta/(theta-1)),i=1..n));

First and Second are the same. But, I want to know how I can modify from the former to the latter.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

taro

 

Hi My main problem is that the new installer is ridiculously small that I cannot even press the buttons acuratley. I am running windows 8.1 on a Surface Pro 2. I had no problems installing maple 17.

 

I also ran into errors using the Bitrock installer 3 times, I am not even sure if it is installed correctly now.

 

is there anyway to get maple 18 without using the Bitrock installer?

Hello guys ...

I used a numerically method to solve couple differential equation that it has some boundary conditions. My problem is that some range of answers has 50% error . Do you know things for improving our answers in maple ?

my problem is :

a*Φ''''(x)+b*Φ''(x)+c*Φ(x)+d*Ψ''(x)+e*Ψ(x):=0

d*Φ''(x)+e*Φ(x)+j*Ψ''(x)+h*Ψ(x):=0

suggestion method by preben Alsholm:

a,b,c,d,e,j,h are constants.suppose some numbers for these constants . I used this code:


VR22:=0.1178*diff(phi(x),x,x,x,x)-0.2167*diff(phi(x),x,x)+0.0156*diff(psi(x),x,x)+0.2852*phi(x)+0.0804*psi(x);
VS22:=0.3668*diff(psi(x),x,x)-0.0156*diff(phi(x),x,x)-0.8043*psi(x)-0.80400*phi(x);
bok:=evalf(dsolve({VR22=0,VS22=0}));

PHI,PSI:=op(subs(bok,[phi(x),psi(x)]));
Eqs:={eval(PHI,x=1.366)=1,eval(diff(PHI,x),x=1.366)=0,eval(PHI,x=-1.366)=1,eval(diff(PHI,x),x=-1.366)=0,
eval(PSI,x=1.366)=1,eval(PSI,x=1.366)=1};
C:=fsolve(Eqs,indets(%,name));
eval(bok,C);
SOL:=fnormal(evalc(%));


I used digits for my code at the first of writting.

please help me ... what should i do?

I'm having some trouble maybe someone can point out my error please. I'm using the Maple 18 worksheet to try some basic linear equations. The trouble is in the last step.

 

1.) I start with 2 ordered pairs (2, 14) and (14,18)

Then I put in my formula to discover the slope. I confirm it looks correct in the Variables window.

m := (y2-y1)/(x2-x1);

 

2.)  Next I input the values for my ordered pairs. I also confirm thru the Variables window.

x1 := 2;

y1 := 14;

x2 := 3;

y2 := 18;

 

3.) Now I can type m and expect to get an answer to what my slope is.

m;

4.) Now I want Slope/Intercept form of y=mx+b. When I put in the formula y-y1=m(x-x1) i get a strange result

 

When I execute this formula, the result is y-14=4. (or thru context menu I tell it to solve for y, then I get y=18)

y-y1=m(x-x1) 

When I manually input the values, the output is y-14=4x-8 (or thru context menu I tell it to solve for y, then I get y=4x+6)

y-14 = 4*(x-2)

 

 

 

Why is my equation (y-y1=m(x-x1)) not executing properly?

hi,I want to solve this equation with the following boundary condition numerically by maple:

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last Page 5 of 262