## Defining order on a set of variables....

Hi everyone

I am stuck in my code. I have a multivariate polynomial and I am trying to define an order on the variables such that I can write my polynomials in a desired normal form. I tried with the Groebner package but that's quite different from what I want.

I want to define the order on the variables as u[i]=v[i] and u[i]<u[i+1].

Lets say my polynomial is f then,

input f= u[1]^2+u[2]+v[3]

output f = v[3]+u[2]+u[1]^2.

If there is a clash between u and v then, either of them can come first, for example,

input f= u[1]^2+u[2]+v[3]+u[3]^2

output f=v[3]+u[3]^2+u[2]+u[1]^2 or f=u[3]^2+v[3]+u[2]+u[1]^2

I hope my question is clear. Thank you for helping me out. Your time is much appreciated :)

## I have an invariant variable while it's declared a...

Hello everyone,

The problem resides in the argument "l" (small l) in the function "ratio", more precisely in the function "expi" then "riskexpjs" then in "ratio", so after try-outs I noticed that, then maple couldn't execute the function plot as decribed in the script.

Best regards,

## building a matrix from a bivariable function...

 (1)

 (2)

 (3)

 (4)

im trying to build a matrix starting from a function, so i can later use this matrix to get a more simple function using linearfit from the statistics package, like a kind of regression.

i want to get a matrix starting from h__1(T1,T__1s) so it has to be a 3 columns matrix (T__1,T__1s,h__1). so as you can see, i have got the functions h__1 and h__2, but i need to evaluate it at differents values for T__1 and T__1s and building a kind of value-table in matrix form.

for h__1, T__1 must be higher than T__1s, or you could get imaginary values, don't know if that important for building the matrix.

thank you very much for your help.

## How do I derive a recurrence relations...

equation 1 : xi+1=xi− (f·gy−fy·g)/(fx ·gy −fy ·gx)
equation 2: yi+1=yi− (fx·g−f·gx)/(fx·gy-fy·gx)

My quesiton are, deriving equations (1) and (2) above and constructing a single Maple function called newt2d that implements both of these recurrence relation.

I apolgize in advance if I don't write my question correctly.  This is my first time posting a question.

## Sampling from multivariate probability distributio...

Hi All,

I have a fucntion f(x,y,z) = exp(-x^2 -y^2 - z^4) and would like to plot the probabity density in real space. One method would be to randomly sample points in a grid based on f(x,y,z). The function f(x,y,z) is clearly peaked around x=y=z=0, so you would expect many points to lie around there. So the plot would look like a clump near (0,0,0) which gets less dense away from (0,0,0).

In the worksheet below, I sampled points from the Uniform distribution to file in the 3d-plot. I would like these points to be sampled from f instead, but am not sure how to do this.

Any help is appreciated,

 > restart;
 > with(Statistics):
 > R := 10; # x-axis size N := 100; # Number f points to sample
 (1)
 > # Unnormalized Probability distrubution f := (x,y,z) -> exp(-x^2 -y^2 - z^2);
 (2)
 > # Clearly f is peaked at (0,0,0) and decays. Therefore I want a plot a lot of points near (0,0,0), and fewer points away from (0,0,0) plot3d(f(x,y,0), x = -1..1, y = -1..1);
 > X := Sample(Uniform(-R, R), N):
 > Y := Sample(Uniform(-R, R), N): Z := Sample(Uniform(-R, R), N): XYZ := Matrix([[X], [Y], [Z]])^%T;
 (3)
 > ScatterPlot3D(XYZ, color = blue, symbolsize = 20);
 >
 >
 >
 >

## word needed for definition...

what do i call a homogenous  differential equation that is the linear sum of "N" differential of unique classification? ie, the implicit construction of a third homogenous differential by the summation of two known, is it the span of the solution sets of the first two or union? i prefer span because well that leaves the door open for multivariate differential basis definitions, non commutative groups like sets of square matrices and all of the other extra arousing subject content.

## New study guide

by: Maple

A new Maple e-book, Multivariate Calculus Study Guide, is now available. Part of the Clickable Calculus collection of interactive Maple e-books, this guide takes full advantage of Maple’s Clickable Math approach. It has over 600 worked examples, the vast majority of which are solved using interactive, Clickable Math techniques.

Deisgned to help students taking this course, instructors may also find this e-book useful as a guide to using Clickable Math to teach Multivariate Calculus.

eithne

## Equalise multivariate polynomials coefficients...

Hello,

I'm writing to ask how to equalize the coefficients of two multivariate polynomials. In particluar, I have two polynomials whose arguments are ln(E),ln(K),ln(L) (their levels, squared levels and interaction terms). The first one is:

(1/2*(p*a*b+(g-p)*b-g))*b*v*a*ln(E)^2-(-1+b)*v*(g-p+a*p)*b*a*ln(E)*ln(K)-b*p*(a-1)*v*a*ln(E)*ln(L)+v*a*b*ln(E)+(1/2*(p*(-1+b)*a+(g-p)*b+p))*(-1+b)*v*a*ln(K)^2+(-1+b)*v*p*(a-1)*a*ln(K)*ln(L)-v*a*(-1+b)*ln(K)+(1/2)*a*p*v*(a-1)*ln(L)^2-v*(a-1)*ln(L)

the second one is:

x_1*ln(E)+x_11*ln(E)^2+x_12*ln(E)*ln(K)+x_13*ln(E)*ln(L)+x_2*ln(K)+x_22*ln(K)^2+x_23*ln(K)*ln(L)+x_3*ln(L)`+x_33*ln(L)^2

I would like to know if it is possible to equalize the coefficients of the two polynomials and find the following system:

v*a*b = x_1, -v*(a-1) x_3, -v*a*(-1+b) = x_2, a*b*v*(b*rho*a-b*rho+g*(-1+b)) = x_11, v*rho*a*(a-1) = x_33, v*a*(rho*(-1+b)*a-rho*(-1+b)+b*g)*(-1+b) = x_22, -a*v*rho*(a-1)*b = x_13, -a*v*(a*rho-rho*u+g)*b*(-1+b) = x_12, a*v*u*rho*(a-1)*(-1+b) = x_23

I tried using "coeffs" and creating a sequence of values for x but then I don't know how to equalize them.

Elena

## Solving a big system of inequalities ...

Hello,

I have a problem with MAPLE. I would like to solve a system of 18 inequalities with 4 variables. The variables shall be rational numbers. I should also mention that I am not sure if the system has a solution. Here is my MAPLE code:

LinearMultivariateSystem({0 < (1/20)*b11, 0 < (1/20)*b1818, 0 < (1/20)*b22, 0 < (1/20)*b33, 0 < -653385574770525739/313841848320000+(1001/20)*b33+(3003/5)*b22+4004*b11-(91/5)*b1818, 0 < -476383516463665673/69742632960000+(3003/20)*b33-(1001/10)*b1818+(27027/2)*b11+(3861/2)*b22, 0 < -372810037848242383/52306974720000+(72072/5)*b11+(3003/20)*b33-(858/5)*b1818+2002*b22, 0 < -302968656462848461/125536739328000+(1001/20)*b33-(1001/10)*b1818+5005*b11+(1365/2)*b22, 0 < -94060277895192911/627683696640000+(91/20)*b33+273*b11-(7/10)*b1818+(91/2)*b22, 0 < -3219528868317343/14944849920000+468*b11+(91/20)*b33-(91/5)*b1818+63*b22, 0 < -1167616840098623/627683696640000+(7/10)*b22+(1/20)*b33+(21/4)*b11-(7/10)*b1818, 0 < 6620337745005653/9510359040000+(91/20)*b1818-(91/5)*b33-(6552/5)*b11-(819/4)*b22, 0 < 10321214321183681/627683696640000-(21/4)*b22-(7/10)*b33-28*b11+(1/20)*b1818, 0 < 19939504442621873/627683696640000-(7/10)*b33-(39/4)*b22-(364/5)*b11+(91/20)*b1818, 0 < 21128314477665001/24141680640000-(91/5)*b33-1848*b11+(1001/20)*b1818-(1001/4)*b22, 0 < 30458564958023749/6340239360000-(1001/10)*b33+(3003/20)*b1818-9828*b11-(27027/20)*b22, 0 < 78768022311702133/17933819904000-(1001/10)*b33-8580*b11+(1001/20)*b1818-(5005/4)*b22, 0 < 418747163878248241/52306974720000-(858/5)*b33+(3003/20)*b1818-16016*b11-(9009/4)*b22}, [b11, b22, b33, b1818])

I am sorry for the writing style but I do not know how to write the command in MAPLE-style in this forum:-)

The first 4 inequalities shall ensure that all four variables b11, b22, b33, b1818 are positive. When entering the command i get the following error:

Best regards,

Lucas

## How to compare two very complex functions?...

Hello maple users,

I have 2 functions and each functions has 8 variables. I run a matlab code and get outputs for different values of these variables. I assumed 3 of them as constant because the combinations are too many. Anyway, I plot the results and I can see that one function is much better than the other. But I need to compare these functions mathematically. I need to show some proofs. Has anyone any idea what should I do? I wrote the functions on maple and take derivative with respect to one variable and try to see the reaction of the functions to that variable. i am confused.

Thanks

## How do I factor a multivariate polynomial?...

I have created a multivariate polynomial with variables P1,...,P6, and would like to factor the poly in terms of (Px-Py) where x,y are combinations of 1-6 (x not equal y). I am new to Maple and have only tried the "Factor" and "Simplify" dropdown menu commands, but neither of these seem to produce anything remotely close to what I need.

Thanks

Derek

I would like to attach a maple document to refer to but dont see how to attach a document to this question.

Edit:

Having Uploaded the intended file, I can direct your attention to eqn (14) which is factored into (15) nicely, but when things get a little more complicated as in (45), the factored form in (46) does not contain any of the (Px-Py) forms I am looking for. Is there a way to steer the factor function toward certain forms?

Edit2:

divide.mw

As seen in this form of the problem statement (using quadratics instead of cubics), the divide function does not seem to capture the factorability. From file divide.mw (attached), eqns (19) and (24) are equivalent since the subtraction of the two produces 0 as seen in (28), however both the factor command (23) and the divide command (29) produce nothing substantive.

## Is it possible to truncate a multivariate polynomi...

Say I have a polynomial x^5 + 4xy^4 + 2y^3 +  x*y^2 + x^2 + y + 3

Can I truncate it up to total degree 3 (for example), so 2y^3 +  x*y^2 + x^2 + y + 3

## resultant of multivariate polynomials...

I am trying to solve the so called Bethe ansatz equations in Mathematical Physics.

I have four multivariate polynomials equations with four unknown p_i(x[1],x[2],x[3],x[4]) i=1,2,3,4; which have integer coefficients. The equations are mixed; P_i is linear in x[j] for x[j]\ne x[i]; and x[i] is of order 10. Due to this structure,  I first eliminate x[4] from these equations. Then use resultant to eliminate x[3],  I got error messages (invalid series, in gcd...