I don't think the geom3d package can be used symbolically it needs specific values. Maybe I'm wrong, am I?

Who knows what Maple does wrong on this one?

T:=Sum(1/(6*k+1)!, k=0..infinity); evalf(T); value(T); evalf(%);

Download sum.mw

Hello all,

I would like to use Maple to simplify an expresion of this form:

I am trying to evalute a double integral symbolically using Maple 15. I have gotten it to work when some of the parameters are specific numbers, but it won't work if I use variables, even if I assume sufficient conditions on them for the integral to make sense. I have tried to use AllSolutions but it didn't work. Breaking it down into steps isn't working either.

I am working on a file on a remote server and I don't think I can upload it here. ...

Dear Readers,

Given an expression for e.g. x^n+ y^3.5, how to extract the symbolic/floating point exponent, I tried with degree method but it fails whenvever there is symbolic or floating point exponent. Is there any alternative ?

Thanks,

Regards, Satya

Hi!

I have a piecewise defined function alpha. Its functional directives are stored in a vector A. But when I call up the command

alpha:=(x1,x2,x3)->piecewise( x1 < 0 , A[1],

0< x1<1 A[2], ...):,

the result (x1,x2,x3)->piecewise(.... , A[1], ...) remains symbolic. What can I do that the entries of A[i] appear in the functional directive?

Thanks!

Hello everyone, new member here. I've been working with Maple 16/Mathematica 8/Matlab to find the determinants of some symbolic nxn matrices (a1,1 a1,2 etc). Matlab is able to do them quite easily but when they start getting too large it starts truncating them down to 25000 terms. Mathematica works like a charm but I want to beable to verify the results with Maple. Maple does great up to 7x7 but at 8x8 it seems to also truncate results like Matlab and past that...

In it's recent edition of Mathematics Today (in print and online), the UK-based Institute of Mathematics and it's Applications, compared 4 symbolic solvers: Maple 15, Mathcad 15, the student edition of Matlab v5 and the Casio CFX-9970G calculator, concluding that "Maple would be the natural choice for research mathematicians, theortetical physicists, those working in any area where mathematics is demanding or for mathematics undergraduates for whom costs are lower"

I'm trying to create a matrix that mimcs the FFT equation as seen here. (Note that I don't want to do the transform, I just want the symbolic matrix of it.) I want to make the matrix in terms of the symbol omega, but I also want it to reduce correctly. Here's what I mean:

I used this post to figure out:

Does anyone know why the two integrations of a heaviside function (u1test and u2test) are not equal? @Preben Alsholm said that the pure symbolic integration u was not correct so that the value of u2test is not correct either. Did I make any mistake in finding u? Is it possible for maple to find the pure symbolic expression of u correctly? Please help!

Hi,

I'm using Maple to carry out some calculations in Tropical algebra, which requires taking minima of real numbers and infinity.

I'm currently using symbols rather than real numbers, which is causing a problem, I have (for example) the following lines of Maple code:

> assume(0 < a)> min(a+infinity, 2*a+infinity) min(a~ + infinity, 2a~ + infinity)

I have a symbolic expression of the form:

I've written 2 long nonlinear symbolic equations with 2 unknowns in Maple, but it doesn't solve it and says:"Kernel connection has been lost".

I have attached my worksheet to this message; what should I do?

problem.mw

Im trying to evaluate a Transfer function from a block diagram.

i have written all the equations but i cant find the command to find the symbolic solution

of theta_l/Theta_d in terms of A,B,C,s,Kp,Kv

attched is the maple file.

i use maple 13.

Hello,

i am currently trying to get some equation of motions. For this i have to invert a matrix which looks like this:

A = GL * M * GL.' (6x6)

M is the massmatrix. GL is a matrix with kinematic constraints because i am working on a closed loop subject. The problem is that GL consists of symbolic trigonometric terms which i can't replace with numbers. Because of the multiplication with the transpose and the massmatrix the elements...

You must be logged into your Facebook account in order to share via Facebook.

Click the button below to share this on Google+. A new window will open.

You must be logged in to your Twitter account in order to share. Click the button below to login (a new window will open.)

Please log-in to your MaplePrimes account.

Wrong Email/Password. Please try again.