MaplePrimes Posts

MaplePrimes Posts are for sharing your experiences, techniques and opinions about Maple, MapleSim and related products, as well as general interests in math and computing.

Latest Post
  • Latest Posts Feed
  • I've developed a framework in Maple for playing with cyclic division algebras. I have methods for multiplication and passing to and from:

    The standard basis over the base field in terms of x^i*y^j and:
    The standard matrix basis for the central simple algebra when taking coefficients in the splitting field.

    I have it done in the case of degree 7, but could generalise it to any prime degree if this is of use to anyone.

    The purpose of this post is to review how well-designed Maple 2017 GUI is for a Microsoft surface pro 4 tablet touch screen with windows 10 pro (64-bit) and to determine the performance of Maple 2017 on my tablet which has a m3 CPU with a 0.9 GHZ base frequency and 4 GB RAM.

    First, my experience is that 4 GB of RAM is far from enough. Under heavy load I have had problems before on other software with 4 GB of RAM. 68 % of my RAM and 41% of the CPU is already gone by simply running Maple and my web browser at the same time before I have even instructed Maple to do any calculations.


    I think a tablet with at least 8 GB of RAM would be preferred. If you only want to use Maple as an expensive calculator then you would most likely not even need 4 GB of RAM. I find that the surface pro 4 to be overpriced for the hardware it provides. I think eve windows 10 tablet with up to 16 GB of RAM and with a much cheaper price looks much more promising than the Microsoft surface pro 4. When I use the surface pro 4 with word 2016 and the reference manager zotero word plugin I sometime notice a trailing line when I sweep up or down in a document with a lot of references which I suspect is because of the low amount of RAM. When I played with Maple 2017 on my surface pro I noticed the same trailing line which again indicates to me that there is not enough RAM. However, I am not certain that low RAM is the cause of such problem.  

    Secondly, I managed to increase the size of the Maple icons under the File, Edit etc. menu so now they have a perfect size for a touch screen tablet. Very cool!


    However, as you can see words in the text menu File, Edit etc. are way too small for a touch screen tablet. There is a lot of room to the right so the words could easily be increased in size. I am also a missing a menu item called maplet where you can attach your own maplets for easy access. It appears that Maple 2017 GUI has not been designed with a touch screen tablet in mind. I wish the words in the text menu File, Edit etc. would have increased when I increased the size of the icons. The text and icons in the sidebar are also way too small for a touch screen tablet. The name of the open tabs is also to small and x that you tap on to close the worksheet is also to small. It is almost impossible to close a worksheet because the x is so small. 

    I thinks there are ways in windows 10 to increase the text size in the menus but I have only been able to increase the text size and icon size for all software at the same time. Since, Maple is more or less the only software that I have where the menu text is too small this is not an optimal solution.   

    The table of content for Maple help files also has too small text as seen in the below picture. However, the biggest problem is not the small words it is the row spacing of the table of content. Some of the words appear almost to be on top of each other. I think the row spacing need to be increased. The text within the help files itself displays beautifully and is in the perfect size.   


    Another problem is that when you swipe up or down on the touch screen you dont go up or down in the maple document. You just highlight text as seen in the picture below. This needs to be fixed. Highlighting should be done by a long tap on the screen as in word 2017 on a touch screen devices.



    The norm today might be to use Maple on a desktop computer or on a laptop but I am convinced that in the future touch screen tablet will become more and more powerful making them an excellent computers to run Maple on because they are so light and portable. I think Maplesoft must have this in mind when they design the GUI.

    Now to test the performance of Maple 2017 on my tablet I decided to generate 1 000 000 random number and see how long it takes. Since I dont have a benchmark it becomes very hard to comment on how fast maple 2017 is on my tablet but I am hoping that someone can run the same code on their machine and comment on this post so we can get a benchmark.        


    Maple 2017 claims that running such code took about 50 seconds on my tablet however when I timed it with a stop watch it only took around 30 seconds hence I am a bit confused as to where the 20 seconds difference comes from?  


    We just posted a submission to the Maple Application Center that I thought people might be interested in. Mathematics for Chemistry isn't a typical application - it's an e-book, written in Maple by J.F. Ogilvie. It covers both standard mathematics topics chemistry students are expected to know,  such as calculus and linear algebra, as well as chemistry-specific topics like chemical equilbrium, quantum chemistry, and nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectra.

    There's lots of interesting content on the Application Center, and the range of topics is always fascinating, but it's not every day I see an entire e-book come across my desk(top)!

    If you are interested, you can find it on the Application Center, here: Mathematics for Chemistry


    While preparing for a recent webinar, I ran across something that didn't behave the same way in Maple 2017 as it did in previous releases. In particular, it was the failure of the over-dot notation for t-derivatives to display with the over-dot. Turns out that this is due to a change in behavior of typesetting that was detailed in the What's New page for Maple 2017, a page I had looked at many times in the last few months, but apparently didn't comprehend fully. The details are below.

    Prior to Maple 2017, under the aegis of extended typesetting, the following two lines of code would alert Maple that the over-dot notation for t-derivatives should be used in the output display.

    However, this changed in Maple 2017. Extended typesetting is now the default, but these two lines of code are no longer sufficient to induce Maple to display the over-dot in output. Indeed, we would now have

    as output. The change is documented in the following paragraph

    lifted from the help page 

    Thus, it now takes the additional command

    to induce Maple to display the over-dot notation in output.

    I must confess that, even though I pored over the "What's New" pages for Maple 2017, I completely missed the import of this change to typesetting. I stumbled over the issue while preparing for an upcoming webinar, and frantically sent out help calls to the developers back in the building. Fortunately, I was quickly set straight on the matter, but was disappointed in my own reading of all the implications of the typesetting changes in Maple 2017. So perhaps this note will alert other users to the changes, and to the help page wherein one finds those essential bits of information needed to complete the tasks we set for ourselves.

    And one more thing - I was cautioned that the "= true" was essential. Without it, the command would act as a query, echoing the present state of the setting, and not making the desired change to the setting.

       It’s that time of year again for the University of Waterloo’s Submarine Racing Team – international competitions for their WatSub are set to soon begin. With a new submarine design in place, they’re getting ready to suit up, dive in, and race against university teams from around the world.


       The WatSub team has come a long way from its roots in a 2014 engineering project. Growing to over 100 members, students have designed and redesigned their submarine in efforts to shave time off their race numbers while maintaining the required safety and performance standards. Their submarine – “Bolt,” as it’s named – was officially unveiled for the 2017 season on Thursday, June 1st.



       As the WatSub team says, "Everything is simple, until you go underwater."



        Designing a working submarine is no easy task, and that’s before you even think about all the details involved. Bolt needs to accommodate a pilot, be transported around the world, and cut through the water with speed, to name a few of the requirements if the WatSub team is to be a serious competitor.


        To help squeeze even more performance out of their design, the team has been using Maple to fine tune and optimize some of their most important structural components. At Maplesoft, we’ve been excited to maintain our sponsorship of the WatSub team as they continue to find new ways to push Bolt’s performance even further.



       The 2017 design unveiling on June 1st. After adding decals and final touches, Bolt will soon be ready to race.


       This year, the WatSub team has given their sub a whole new design, machining new body parts, optimizing the weight distribution of their gearbox, and installing a redesigned propeller system. Using Maple, they could go deep into design trade-offs early, and come away knowing the optimal gearbox design for their submarine.


       In just over a month, the WatSub team will take Bolt across the pond and compete in the European International Submarine Races (eISR). Many teams competing have been in existence for well over a decade, but the leaps and strides taken by the WatSub team have made them a serious competitor for this year.

      Best of luck to the WatSub team and their submarine, Bolt – we’re all rooting for you!

    I am thinking about buying maple 2017 however there are only 4 different categories to choose from when you want to buy: student, commercial, academic and government. I dont belong to any of them! Also the price difference is huge! I am on disability benefits and the academic license cost more or less the same amount that I get in disability benifts each month to cover my food, rent and medicines which is approximatly 1 100 usd. The price for a student licens is completely realistic and is a price that I am willing to pay but I am not a student and I dont feel comfortable claiming that I am even though everyone is a student as long as they live. When you stop learning you life is more or less over anyway. If I am forced to pay around 1 000 usd then I am not going to buy maple 2017. Then I am just going to continue using MathPapa free algbra calculator because to be honest I dont really need maple that much in my research today but there are a couple of reaons why I want to buy. 1) I would like to support maplesoft because I think you have the best and most userfriendly mathematical software on the market. 2) I want to hedge my bets. My needs might change in the future. 3) I want to be able to run my large number of old worksheets and see if I can improve them. 4) I want to see what changes and improvments have been made to maple 2017 compared to let say 5 years ago and to assess if these changes provide any value to me. 

    A question was raised recently on Stewart Gough platforms.  I decided to tidy up some old code to show platform position and leg lengths for any given displacement.



    Hexapod Setup Data


    RotZ := proc (delta) options operator, arrow; Matrix(1 .. 3, 1 .. 3, {(1, 1) = cos(delta), (1, 2) = -sin(delta), (1, 3) = 0, (2, 1) = sin(delta), (2, 2) = cos(delta), (2, 3) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = 1}, datatype = anything, storage = rectangular, order = Fortran_order, subtype = Matrix) end proc

    a[1] := Vector(3, [.5, 3.0, 0]); a[2] := evalf(RotZ(20*((1/180)*Pi)).a[1]); a[3] := evalf(RotZ(100*((1/180)*Pi)).a[2]); a[4] := evalf(RotZ(20*((1/180)*Pi)).a[3]); a[5] := evalf(RotZ(100*((1/180)*Pi)).a[4]); a[6] := evalf(RotZ(20*((1/180)*Pi)).a[5])

    b[1] := evalf(.7*RotZ(-40*((1/180)*Pi)).a[1]); b[2] := evalf(RotZ(100*Pi*(1/180)).b[1]); b[3] := evalf(RotZ(20*Pi*(1/180)).b[2]); b[4] := evalf(RotZ(100*Pi*(1/180)).b[3]); b[5] := evalf(RotZ(20*Pi*(1/180)).b[4]); b[6] := evalf(RotZ(100*Pi*(1/180)).b[5])

    Zeroposn := Vector(3, [0, 0, 3])

    Tx := Vector(3, [1, 0, 0]); Ty := Vector(3, [0, 1, 0]); Tz := Vector(3, [0, 0, 1])






    PlatPosn := proc (x := 0, y := 0, z := 0, alpha := 0, beta := 0, delta := 0) local i, v, Rot, L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6; global txn, tyn, tzn, ctrp; description "Calculates the platform position in the Global Coordinates, Unit normals and Leg Lengths"; v := Vector(3, [x, y, z]); ctrp := Zeroposn+v; Rot := Matrix(1 .. 3, 1 .. 3, {(1, 1) = cos(delta)*cos(beta), (1, 2) = -sin(delta)*cos(alpha)+cos(delta)*sin(beta)*sin(alpha), (1, 3) = sin(delta)*sin(alpha)+cos(delta)*sin(beta)*cos(alpha), (2, 1) = sin(delta)*cos(beta), (2, 2) = cos(delta)*cos(alpha)+sin(delta)*sin(beta)*sin(alpha), (2, 3) = -cos(delta)*sin(alpha)+sin(delta)*sin(beta)*cos(alpha), (3, 1) = -sin(beta), (3, 2) = cos(beta)*sin(alpha), (3, 3) = cos(beta)*cos(alpha)}, datatype = anything, storage = rectangular, order = Fortran_order, subtype = Matrix); for i to 6 do bn || i := Zeroposn+v+Rot.b[i] end do; txn := Rot.Tx; tyn := Rot.Ty; tzn := Rot.Tz; print(" Platform centre Global", ctrp); print(" Platform corner Co-ords Global", bn1, bn2, bn3, bn4, bn5, bn6); print("Platform Triad Vectors  ", "X green ", txn, "Y blue", tyn, "Z red ", tzn); L1 := sqrt((bn1-a[1])^%T.(bn1-a[1])); L2 := sqrt((bn2-a[2])^%T.(bn2-a[2])); L3 := sqrt((bn3-a[3])^%T.(bn3-a[3])); L4 := sqrt((bn4-a[4])^%T.(bn4-a[4])); L5 := sqrt((bn5-a[5])^%T.(bn5-a[5])); L6 := sqrt((bn6-a[6])^%T.(bn6-a[6])); print("Leg Lengths"); print("L1= ", L1); print("L2= ", L2); print("L3= ", L3); print("L4= ", L4); print("L5= ", L5); print("L6= ", L6) end proc


    PlatPlot := proc () local Base, Platformdisplacement, picL1, picL2, picL3, picL4, picL5, picL6; global tx0, ty0, tz0; description "Displays the Hexapod"; Base := plots:-polygonplot3d(Matrix([a[1], a[2], a[3], a[4], a[5], a[6]], datatype = float), color = black, transparency = .5); Platformdisplacement := plots:-polygonplot3d(Matrix([seq(bn || i, i = 1 .. 6)]), color = cyan, transparency = .5); picL1 := plots:-arrow(a[1], bn || 1-a[1], colour = green); picL2 := plots:-arrow(a[2], bn || 2-a[2], colour = blue); picL3 := plots:-arrow(a[3], bn || 3-a[3], colour = blue); picL4 := plots:-arrow(a[4], bn || 4-a[4], colour = blue); picL5 := plots:-arrow(a[5], bn || 5-a[5], colour = blue); picL6 := plots:-arrow(a[6], bn || 6-a[6], colour = orange); tx0 := plots:-arrow(ctrp, txn, colour = green); ty0 := plots:-arrow(ctrp, tyn, colour = blue); tz0 := plots:-arrow(ctrp, tzn, colour = red); plots:-display(Base, picL1, picL2, picL3, picL4, picL5, picL6, Platformdisplacement, tx0, ty0, tz0, axes = box, labels = [X, Y, Z], scaling = constrained) end proc






    "L6= ", 3.586394355





    PlatPosn(.52, -.89, .7, .2, .67, .3)

    "L6= ", 3.055217994








    print('tzn' = LinearAlgebra:-CrossProduct(txn, tyn), `= `, tzn)

    tzn = Vector[column](%id = 18446744074564617750), `= `, Vector[column](%id = 18446744074328082542)





    Rotation Matrices




    RotZ := Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = cos(delta), (1, 2) = -sin(delta), (1, 3) = 0, (2, 1) = sin(delta), (2, 2) = cos(delta), (2, 3) = 0, (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = 1})

    RotY := Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = cos(beta), (1, 2) = 0, (1, 3) = sin(beta), (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = 1, (2, 3) = 0, (3, 1) = -sin(beta), (3, 2) = 0, (3, 3) = cos(beta)})

    RotX := Matrix(3, 3, {(1, 1) = 1, (1, 2) = 0, (1, 3) = 0, (2, 1) = 0, (2, 2) = cos(alpha), (2, 3) = -sin(alpha), (3, 1) = 0, (3, 2) = sin(alpha), (3, 3) = cos(alpha)})


    ROT := RotZ.RotY.RotX

    Matrix(%id = 18446744074564619310)







    With this application the components of the acceleration can be calculated. The components of the acceleration in scalar and vector of the tangent and the normal. In addition to the curvilinear kinetics in polar coordinates. It can be used in different engineers, especially mechanics, civilians and more.

    In Spanish.




    Lenin Araujo Castillo

    Ambassador of Maple



    Maple 2017 has launched!

    Maple 2017 is the result of hard work by an enthusiastic team of developers and mathematicians.

    As ever, we’re guided by you, our users. Many of the new features are of a result of your feedback, while others are passion projects that we feel you will find value in.

    Here’s a few of my favourite enhancements. There’s far more that’s new - see What’s New in Maple 2017 to learn more.


    MapleCloud Package Manager

    Since it was first introduced in Maple 14, the MapleCloud has made thousands of Maple documents and interactive applications available through a web interface.

    Maple 2017 completely refreshes the MapleCloud experience. Allied with a new, crisp, interface, you can now download and install user-created packages.

    Simply open the MapleCloud interface from within Maple, and a mouse click later, you see a list of user-created packages, continuously updated via the Internet. Two clicks later, you’ve downloaded and installed a package.

    This completely bypasses the traditional process of searching for and downloading a package, copying to the right folder, and then modifying libname in Maple. That was a laborious process, and, unless I was motivated, stopped me from installing packages.

    The MapleCloud hosts a growing number of packages.

    Many regular visitors to MaplePrimes are already familiar with Sergey Moiseev’s DirectSearch package for optimization, equation solving and curve fitting.

    My fellow product manager, @DSkoog has written a package for grouping data into similar clusters (called ClusterAnalysis on the Package Manager)

    Here’s a sample from a package I hacked together for downloading maps images using the Google Maps API (it’s called Google Maps and Geocoding on the Package Manager).

    You’ll also find user-developed packages for exploring AES-based encryption, orthogonal series expansions, building Maple shell scripts and more.

    Simply by making the process of finding and installing packages trivially easy, we’ve opened up a new world of functionality to users.

    Maple 2017 also offers a simple method for package authors to upload workbook-based packages to the MapleCloud.

    We’re engaging with many package authors to add to the growing list of packages on the MapleCloud. We’d be interested in seeing your packages, too!


    Advanced Math

    We’re committed to continually improving the core symbolic math routines. Here area few examples of what to expect in Maple 2017.

    Resulting from enhancements to the Risch algorithm, Maple 2017 now computes symbolic integrals that were previously intractable

    Groeber:-Basis uses a new implementation of the FGLM algorithm. The example below runs about 200 times faster in Maple 2017.

    gcdex now uses a sparse primitive polynomial remainder sequence together.  For sparse structured problems the new routine is orders of magnitude faster. The example below was previously intractable.

    The asympt and limit commands can now handle asymptotic cases of the incomplete Γ function where both arguments tend to infinity and their quotient remains finite.

    Among several improvements in mathematical functions, you can now calculate and manipulate the four multi-parameter Appell functions.


    Appel functions are of increasing importance in quantum mechanics, molecular physics, and general relativity.

    pdsolve has seen many enhancements. For example, you can tell Maple that a dependent variable is bounded. This has the potential of simplifying the form of a solution.


    Plot Builder

    Plotting is probably the most common application of Maple, and for many years, you’ve been able to create these plots without using commands, if you want to.  Now, the re-designed interactive Plot Builder makes this process easier and better.

    When invoked by a context menu or command on an expression or function, a panel slides out from the right-hand side of the interface.


    Generating and customizing plots takes a single mouse click. You alter plot types, change formatting options on the fly and more.

    To help you better learn Maple syntax, you can also display the actual plot command.

    Password Protected Content

    You can distribute password-protected executable content. This feature uses the workbook file format introduced with Maple 2016.

    You can lock down any worksheet in a Workbook. But from any other worksheet, you can send (author-specified) parameters into the locked worksheet, and extract (author-specified) results.


    Plot Annotations

    You can now get information to pop up when you hover over a point or a curve on a plot.

    In this application, you see the location and magnitude of an earthquake when you hover over a point

    Here’s a ternary diagram of the color of gold-silver-copper alloys. If you let your mouse hover over the points, you see the composition of the points

    Plot annotations may seem like a small feature, but they add an extra layer of depth to your visualizations. I’ve started using them all the time!


    Engineering Portal

    In my experience, if you ask an engineer how they prefer to learn, the vast majority of them will say “show me an example”. The significantly updated Maple Portal for Engineers does just that, incorporating many more examples and sample applications.  In fact, it has a whole new Application Gallery containing dozens of applications that solve concrete problems from different branches of engineering while illustrating important Maple techniques.

    Designed as a starting point for engineers using Maple, the Portal also includes information on math and programming, interface features for managing your projects, data analysis and visualization tools, working with physical and scientific data, and a variety of specialized topics.


    Geographic Data

    You can now generate and customize world maps. This for example, is a choropleth of European fertility rates (lighter colors indicate lower fertility rates)

    You can plot great circles that show the shortest path between two locations, show varying levels of detail on the map, and even experiment with map projections.

    A new geographic database contains over one million locations, cross-referenced with their longitude, latitude, political designation and population.

    The database is tightly linked to the mapping tools. Here, we ask Maple to plot the location of country capitals with a population of greater than 8 million and a longitude lower than 30.


    There’s much more to Maple 2017. It’s a deep, rich release that has something for everyone.

    Visit What’s New in Maple 2017 to learn more.

    Meta Keijzer-de Ruijter is a Project Manager for Digital Testing at TU Delft, an institution that is at the forefront of the digital revolution in academic institutions. Meta has been using Maple T.A. for years, and offered to provide her insight on the role that automated testing & assessment played in improving student pass rates at TU Delft.


    Modern technology is transforming many aspects of the world we live in, including education. At TU Delft in the Netherlands, we have taken a leadership role in transforming learning through the use of technology. Our ambition is to get to a point where we are offering fully digitalized degree programs and we believe digital testing and assessment can play an important role in this process.


    A few years ago we launched a project with the goal of using digital testing to drastically improve the pass rates in our programs. Digital testing helps organize testing more efficiently for a larger number of students, addressing issues of overcrowded classrooms, and high teaching workloads. To better facilitate this transformation, we decided to adopt Maple T.A., the online testing and assessment suite from Maplesoft. Maple T.A. also provides anytime/anywhere testing, allowing students to take tests digitally, even from remote locations.


    Regular and repeated testing produces the best learning results because progressive monitoring offers instructors the possibility of making adjustments throughout the course. The randomization feature in Maple T.A. provides each student with an individual set of problems, reducing the likelihood that answers will be copied. Though Maple T.A. is specialized in mathematics, it also supports more common question types like multiple choice, multiple selection, fill-in-the-blanks and hot spot. Maple T.A.’s question randomization, possibilities for multiple response fields per question and question workflow (adaptive questions) are superior to other options. By offering regular homework assignments and analyzing the results, we gain better insight into the progress of students and the topics that students perceive as difficult. Our lecturers can use this insight to decide whether to repeat particular material or to offer it in another manner. In many courses, preparing and reviewing practice tests comprise an important, yet time-consuming task for lecturers, and Maple T.A. alleviates that burden.


    At TU Delft, we require all first-year students to take a math entry test using Maple T.A in order to assess the required level of math. Since the assessment of the student’s ability is so heavily dependent upon qualifying tests, it is extremely important for the test to be completed under controlled conditions. In Maple T.A., it is easy to generate multiple versions of the test questions without increasing the burden of review, as the tests are graded immediately. Students that fail the entry test are offered a remedial course in which they receive explanations and complete exercises, under the supervision of student assistants. The use of Maple T.A. facilitates this process without placing additional burden on the teacher. When the practice tests and the associated feedback are placed in a shared item bank in Maple T.A., teachers are able to offer additional practice materials to students with little effort. It makes it considerably easier on us as teachers to be able to use a variety of question types, thus creating a varied test.


    Each semester, TU Delft offers an English placement test that is taken by approximately 200 students and 50 PhD candidates, in which students are required to formulate their reasons for their program choices or research topics. It used to take four lecturers working full-time for two days to mark the tests and report the results to participants in a timely manner. The digitization of this test has saved us considerable time. The hundred fill-in-the-blank questions are now marked automatically, and we no longer have to decipher handwriting for the open questions!


    TU Delft is not alone in its emphasis on digital testing; it has a prominent position on the agendas of many institutions in Europe and elsewhere. These institutions are intensively involved in improving, expanding and advocating the positive results from digital testing and digital learning experiences. Online education solutions like Maple T.A. are playing a key role in improving the quality of digital offerings at institutions.

    In the recent years much software has undergone a change towards allowing for better sharing of documents. As is the case with other software as well, the users are no longer mainly single persons sitting in a dark corner doing their own stuff. Luckily Maplesoft has taken an important step in that direction too by introducing MapleCloud some years ago. This means that it is now possible quite easily to discuss calculations done in Maple in the classroom. One student uploads and the Teacher can find the document seconds later on his own computer connected to a Projector and show the student's solutions for the other  students in the classroom. That's indeed great! Maple is however lacking in one important aspect: It's Graphics User Interface (GUI) is not completely ready to for that challenge! I noticed that quite recently when the entire teaching staff received new netbooks: 14 inch Lenovo Yoga X1 with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. From factory defaults text zoom was set to 200%. Without it, text would be too small in all applications used on the computer. The Microsoft Office package and most other software has adapted to this new situation dealing with high variation in the users screen resolutions, but not Maplesoft:

    1. Plots and Images inserted become very small
    2. Open File dialogs and the like contain shortened text for folder names ... (you actually have to guess what the folders are)
    3. Help menus are cluttered up and difficult to read.

    I show screen images of all three types below.

    I know it is possible to make plots larger by using the option size, but since it relies on pixels it doesn't work when documents are shared between students and teachers. You cannot expect the receiving student/teacher to make a lot of changes in the document just to be able to read it. It will completely destroy the workflow!

    Why doesn't Maplesoft allow for letting documents display proportionally on the users computer like so many other programs do? Why do it need to be in pixels? If it is possible to make it proportional, it would also solve another issue: Making prints (to a printer or to pdf) look more like they do on the screen than is the case at present.

    I really hope Maplesoft will address this GUI challenge, because I am sure the issue will pile up quite rapidly. Due to higher costs, most laptops/netbooks among students don't have that high resolution compared to computer dimensions at the moment, but we already have received a few remarks from students owning such computers. Very soon those highend solution computers will dive into the consumer market and become very common.

    I have mentioned this important GUI issue in the beta-testing group, but I don't think those groups really are adapted to discussions, more bug fixes. Therefore I have made this Post in the hope that some Maple users and some chief developers will comment on it!

    Now I have criticized the Maple GUI, I also feel urged to tell in what departments I think Maple really excels:

    1. The Document-structure is great. One can produce good looking documents containing 'written math' (inactive math) and/or 'calculated math'. All-in-one! Other competting software does need one to handle things separatly.
    2. Sections and subsections. We have actually started using Maple to create documents containing entire chapters or surveys of mathematics or physics subjects, helping students to get a better overview. I am pretty sure the Workbook tool also will help here.
    3. Calculations are all connected. One can recalculate the document or parts of it, eventually using new parameters. Using Maple for performing matematical experiments. Mathematical experiments is a method entering more into the different mathematics curriculums.
    4. MapleCloud. Easy sharing of documents among students and teachers.
    5. Interactive possibilities through the Explore command and other commands. Math Apps as well.
    6. Besides that mathematical symbols can be accessed from the keyboard, they can also be accessed from palettes by less experinced users.  
    7. Good choice by Maple to let the user globally decide the size text and math is displayed in Maple - set globally in the menu Tools < Options.
    8. Maple can handle units in Physics
    9. Maple has World-Class capabilities. If you have a mathematical problem, Maple can probably handle it. You just need to figure out how.
    10. etc.


    Small plots:


    Shortened dialog text:


    Cluttered help menus:





    Earlier today, we published an update that improves the way MaplePrimes handles tags.

    New features include: 

    • There are now tags for Maple Commands and Maple Packages. These tags are denoted with special icons, and cannot be edited. The hope is that these special tags will be useful to anyone looking for assistance with a particular command or package, and will provide another centralized location to find support. For example, a command tag for the plot command will look as follows:.  A package tag looks like:
    • The tags page has been completely updated to show tag use over time, and also provides information about specific tags. Users with moderator privileges can also edit tags directly from this page.
    • Hundreds of inappropriate or 'garbage' tags have been removed.


    In addition to the changes to our tagging, we made a few other improvements and updates, including:

    • New academically- and techically-focused social networks have been added to user profiles
    • Updates to the message editor to improve WYSIWYG consistency
    • A variety of smaller fixes and improvements

    I hope you find these improvements valuable, and look forward to your comments and suggestions for future improvements.


    I noticed Mapleprime have entries of users who clearly create an account just to put a bad website URL in there and they are just spam.

    Why do not the moderators of Mapleprime purge these out? Mapleprime is full of these spam marketing users.   Here are just few I found in few clicks

    There are hundereds of these spam URLS in there. They make an account, only to add their infected web site URL there so if someone clicks on it they get virus.

    Moderators of mapleprime should do better job and remove these cleary spam entries from Mapleprime.

    The is and coulditbe commands of Maple are known to be buggy.
    Here are some math inventions done by these commands in Maple 2016.2.

    restart; assume(x::real, y::real);
    is(exp(x+I*y) <> 0);
    coulditbe(exp(x+I*y) = 0);
    coulditbe(exp(x+I*y) = infinity);
    coulditbe((x+I*y)^2 = infinity);

    It should be noticed that




    The latter means


    , no more and no less.

    First 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Last Page 50 of 298