The code

gives us following output:

s := RootOf(-sin(_Z)*Pi + 3*_Z)

The allvalues command attempts to find symbolic representations of the roots using solve.
But  the code:

gives us 

RootOf(-sin(_Z)*Pi + 3*_Z, 0.5235987756), RootOf(-sin(_Z)*Pi + 3*_Z, -0.5235987756), 0

RootOf(-sin(_Z)*Pi + 3*_Z)

To see the roots of sin(x)-3*x/Pi   we use plot

And we can also figure out  three roots of this function are 0 ,  Pi/6 and -Pi/6. 

High probability it has no other root.

0, 0, 0

Why doesn't Maple do anything about it

Why doesn't the graphs of alpha=0 and alpha=1  appear in the following code?

restart:
v:=t->t:
plot([seq(fracdiff(v(t), t,alpha),alpha=-1..1.5,0.5)],t=0..10,view=[0..9.5,0..5],legend=[seq('alpha'=alpha,alpha=-1..1.5,0.5)],color = [red, blue, green,yellow,cyan,magenta],axis[2]=[gridlines=[linestyle=dot]]);

if alpha=1;

fracdiff(t, t,alpha)

gives 1. But it doesn't appear in the figure. 

if alpha=0, 

fracdiff(t, t,alpha)

gives t. But it doesn't appear in the figure, also. 

How can i remove a section envelope ( the initial arrow and the vertical line) without removing the content.

In other words how can I liberate the content from being imprisoned in the section

Thank you

Hi,

I would like to create an animation of the solutions to a differential equation, but I can't get animation to work.  I copy and pasted

plots[animate]( plot, [A*sin(x), x=0..10], A=0..2 )

into maple, but the animation did not animate, and only plotted the result for A = 0.  I am using Maple 2019.  Any ideas?

Hi,
I see more and more contributions where the content of the mw file is replaced by a code snippet and, possibly, an image as illustration.
Do we have to consider this as the new norm to post question and to submit replies or answers?

(this question is related to the one Carl Love posted a few days ago  Why can't I display any worksheet? and which, if I'm not mistaken, has not been definively answered)

restart:
nuhf:=0.294*10^(-6):
Rehf:=Vhf*H/nuhf:
Vhf:=0.5:
rhohf:=965.31:
Lhs:=2.5*10^(-3):
DP1:=f1*Lhs*rhohf*Vhf^2/(2*H):
f1:=4*18.3/Rehf:
Whs:=1:
mhf:=rhohf*Vhf*Whs*H:
Rehf:=Vhf*H/nuhf:
PL1:=DP1*mhf/rhohf:
DP2:=f2*Lhs*rhohf*Vhf^2/(2*H):
f2:=0.3164/(Rehf^(0.25)):
PL2:=DP2*mhf/rhohf:
procd:=proc(H)
    if Rehf<1000 then PL1 elif Rehf>1000 then PL2 else 0 fi;
   end;

plot('procd(H)',H=0..0.002);

When doing solve(res,x); maple returns back x

Does this means the equation is true for any x?

Also, doing PDEtools:-Solve(res,x) returns nothing.

I was trying to check if my solution is valid for an ode, and I obtained res above is what odetest() gives back, I wanted to find for what x could res be zero.

Here is the code

restart;
ode:=diff(y(x),x)=2*sqrt(1+y(x))*cos(x);
my_sol:=y(x)=sin(x)^2+2*sin(x);
res:=odetest(my_sol,ode);
res:=simplify(res)=0;
solve(res,x);

And now 

PDEtools:-Solve(res,x)

gives nothing.

So I am a little confused what is going on. does solve result mean the equation is true for any x (I think the solution I have is correct, so may be what this means,  but wanted to make sure, as I do not think I've seen this before)  And if so, why then PDEtools:-Solve did not return the same result.

Maple 2020.2, windows 10, Physics 897

I know that I can use writeto() and appendto() to redirect Maple output to a file.  However, I have not been able to get this to work properly with tables or special characters.

Is there a way to change this?

 I'm new to Maple, recently I'm focusing on the implicitplot.  "Help" tells me that gridrefine specifies the number of recursive subdivisions to perform on any cells in the initial grid that have been determined to contain part of the curve to be plotted. Now I have a function to implicitplot. I find that when I increase the gridrefine, the figure is rougher, why does this happen since the recursive subdivisions are increased?

restart: F:=(x,y) -> -(1/2)*(25*(-2/25+y^2*(x^2+1)))*(1/2)^((-x^2+1)/(x^2+1))+4*(1/2)^(2*x^2/(x^2+1))*(1/25)+5*y^2*(1/2)^(-2*x^2/(x^2+1)); Digits:=20; plots:-implicitplot(F,0..20,0..10,gridrefine=3,crossingrefine=5,numpoints=1000,labels=["x","y"]); plots:-implicitplot(F,0..20,0..10,gridrefine=6,crossingrefine=5,numpoints=1000,labels=["x","y"]);

Maple gives solution to equation as RootOf when there is no explicit solution

restart;
eq:=x*sin(x*y)+y+1=0;
sol:=solve(eq,y)

The _Z above, is the variable we wanted to solve for, which is y in this example. My question is, why did not Maple give the solution as

sol2:=RootOf(x*sin(_Z*x)+_Z+1)

Which is a little simpler looking. Is the above not the same as what Maple gives?  I just replace y by _Z 

Digits:=100;
plot(evalf(sol-sol2),x=0..Pi)

The uploaded worksheet contains the general definition of a pedal curve related to the curve [f(t),g(t)], and includes several example pedal curves.

Is there a comparable general definition of a pedal surface? If so, in your answer please include the Maple code for one or two simple examples e.g. relating to a sphere, to an ellipsoid.

To everyone in the Maple Forum community, Happy Holidays and a fulfilling New Year!

Pedal_curves.mw 

If the equation with homogeous coordinates in the base (A,B,C) is pYZ+qZX+rXY=0, an affine  equation in the base (A,AB,AC) is
pxy+qy(1-x-y)+r(1-x-y)=0, it is also written rx²+(q+r-p)xy+qy²=0. The discrim of  trinom is rx²+(q+r-p)xy+qy² is of the sign of 
delta=(q+r-p)²-4qr; We get a hyperbole, a parabole, an ellipse according to delta is >0, =0 or <0 respectvely. How implement
this property. Thank you very much.

Here is my try to integrate the expression L with trapozoid or simpson 

numerical_int.mw

Hi,

Just to inform me about the options to add in my code , to have a style similar to the  picture..

Thanks

QuestionOptionVolume.mw

Why do I get this wrong result when I try to solve formally this ode (note that acer has already obtained its implicit form here implicit)

restart:
interface(version)
Standard Worksheet Interface, Maple 2015.2, Mac OS X, December 21 2015 Build ID 1097895

edo := diff(y(x), x, x) = 1/y(x) - x*diff(y(x), x)/y(x)^2;
ic  := y(0)=1, D(y)(0)=0:

dsolve({edo, ic}, y(x));
eval(edo, %)
                                        / d      \
                                      x |--- y(x)|
               d  / d      \    1       \ dx     /
              --- |--- y(x)| = ---- - ------------
               dx \ dx     /   y(x)          2    
                                         y(x)     
                    
                            y(x) = 1

                             0 = 1

Thanks in advance