14818 Reputation

24 Badges

11 years, 328 days

MaplePrimes Activity

These are replies submitted by Kitonum

@emendes  Then I do not understand you. You wrote "...I just need subsets with a chosen number of elements..". I showed how to generate all subsets of a given size. You write that this is not what you need. Can you more accurately formulate your goal?
Here's an example of another way to solve the problem. We generate all triples of numbers in the range 1..10, the sum of which does not exceed 10:

seq(seq(seq(`if`(i+j+k<=10,{i,j,k},NULL), k=j+1..10), j=i+1..9), i=1..8);

   {1, 2, 3}, {1, 2, 4}, {1, 2, 5}, {1, 2, 6}, {1, 2, 7}, {1, 3, 4}, {1, 3, 5}, {1, 3, 6}, {1, 4, 5}, {2, 3, 4}, {2, 3, 5}

See also the commands in the  Iterator  package for your purposes.

@SIMBA  It is probably impossible to obtain the indefinite integral 

int(tanh(x)/sqrt(x^2+1), x);

 in closed form.

@Al86  In order for the equality  f'(x1)=f'(x2)=(f(x1)-f(x2))/(x1-x2)  to be fulfilled, you need to find such 2 points on the graph so that the line passing through these 2 points touches the graph at these points. The solution is below.


fsolve({D(f)(x1)=D(f)(x2),(f(x2)-f(x1))/(x2-x1)=D(f)(x1)}, {x1=0..1,x2=0..1});
x2,x1:=eval([x2,x1], %)[];

plot([f(x),solve((y-f(x1))/(f(x2)-f(x1))=(x-x1)/(x2-x1),y)], x=-0.1..1, color=[red,blue]);


I do not understand the meaning "I want to find the graph of f above in the interval [x1,x2] or [x2,x1] alongside the same function f but which also satisfies at the point of intersection with the above graph f''(x)=0."

Please specify which polynomials are in question. You wrote "How can I define a set generated by two degree n  polynomials with binary coefficients?". But in your example for  n = 2  we see a product of two polynomials, each of the 1st degree and with two variables. And what will happen for n = 3?


Present here the full code of your worksheet.

I think that the point of the problem is that one of the lines is vertical, that is, it is not expressed in the form y = ax + b. If we reflect everything relatively straight line  y=x  (I just changed the order of coordinates), then it is obvious that the angle will not change, but the result will be correct:

point(o, 0, 0): 
point(A, 1, 0): 
point(d, 2, 0):
point(F,  1.4472135960, 0.8944271920): 
line(lOD, [o, d]): 
line(lAF, [A, F]): 
alpha := FindAngle(lOD, lAF);



@acer  Thank you for your ways to solving the problem. Using the latter option, I could easily find  R=cos(Pi/17)  in the radicals. Only had to add as an option the field extension  sqrt(17)  in the  factor  command:




@Anthrazit  If you do not want to use custom procedures, then first run  interface(displayprecision=n):  command, where   is the number of digits that you want after the decimal point.

Example of use:

See help on the interface command for details.

@anthonyfl  Very small changes to the code will be required. The animation parameter will be  x  not  y :

X:=r*cos(phi): Y:=r*sin(phi):
P:=plot3d(eval([[X,Y,f],[X,Y,g]],x=r), r=0..4, phi=0..2*Pi, style=surface, color=["Khaki","LightBlue"], scaling=constrained, axes=normal, labels=[z,x,y], orientation=[20,80], transparency=0.3):
F:=x->plots:-display(plot3d([[X,Y,x^2/8],[X,Y,sqrt(x)]], r=x..x+h, phi=0..2*Pi, style=surface, color=gold), plot3d([eval([X,Y,H],r=x),eval([X,Y,H],r=x+h)], H=x^2/8..sqrt(x), phi=0..2*Pi, style=surface, color=gold)):
plots:-animate(F,[x], x=0..4-h, frames=60, background=P);



@JAMET  I have updated my worksheet according to your wishes.

@dharr  Thank you! I did not know that  add  works on matrices. It probably appeared in recent versions of Maple.

@Carl Love First I took the function  x->(x^3-x)*(x^2+1)/(x^4+1)  whose zeros are  -1, 0, 1  and the oblique asymptote is y=x  and then made the obvious change  x->-(x-2)



        Maple 2018.2, X86 64 WINDOWS, Oct 23 2018, Build ID 1356656

This error also occurred to me in earlier versions.

@tomleslie  Your code does not work in Maple 2018.2 and probably in many earlier versions. This is a famous bug. But there is a simple workaround. You just need to increase  Digits .

restart; with(Optimization)

LPSolve(5*x1+2*x2+7*x3+6*x4+x5+6*x6+8*x7+6*x8, {10*x1+9*x2+15*x3+3*x4+11*x5+6*x6+3*x7+4*x8 <= 22}, assume = {integer, nonnegative}, maximize = true)

Warning, problem appears to be unbounded


[0, [x1 = 0, x2 = 0, x3 = 0, x4 = 0, x5 = 0, x6 = 0, x7 = 0, x8 = 0]]



LPSolve(5*x1+2*x2+7*x3+6*x4+x5+6*x6+8*x7+6*x8, {10*x1+9*x2+15*x3+3*x4+11*x5+6*x6+3*x7+4*x8 <= 22}, assume = {integer, nonnegative}, maximize = true);

[56, [x1 = 0, x2 = 0, x3 = 0, x4 = 0, x5 = 0, x6 = 0, x7 = 7, x8 = 0]]





Your code does not work, because the grid is not small enough. See help about  gridrefine  option in  plots:-implicitplot . The following code works:

with(plots, implicitplot):
implicitplot(2+r*(b-2)*sqrt(b-1), b = -10 .. 10, r = -10 .. 10, scaling = constrained, gridrefine = 3);


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 2 of 111