ln(x) assuming x<0

January 09 2012 by Ratch 176
false

0


Why doesn't Maple evaluate ln(x) assuming x<0 to ln(-x) instead of ln(x).  I know that it can evaluate negative operands into complex numbers, but sometime I would just like it to say ln(-x).  It seems to work OK for sqrt(x) assuming x<0. 

Ratch

 
Loading Comments & Answers

You must be logged into your MaplePrimes account in order to post a comment. If you don't have an account, you can create an account here.

     

Forgot Your Password? Create an Account