0
Why doesn't Maple evaluate ln(x) assuming x<0 to ln(-x) instead of ln(x). I know that it can evaluate negative operands into complex numbers, but sometime I would just like it to say ln(-x). It seems to work OK for sqrt(x) assuming x<0.
Ratch
You must be logged into your MaplePrimes account in order to post a comment. If you don't have an account, you can create an account here.