Do I need to view them as integrals ?

Not directly "quality", but questionable in "design":

It completely ignores classical interface (and since one can not convert to it that is a mess).

And unfortunately not much care (=advice to authors) seems to be taken, to keep it a little bit
comaptible to older versions.

Though I understand and accept its role for advertising: if that is the only point, then it is just
ignoring possible customer needs (and for me it results in the converse of the intended aim).

Example: Moiseev's "orthogonal series expansions package" www.maplesoft.com/applications/view.aspx
neither displays graphics in Maple 12 nor runs in that version (I think it is due to some variants
in the numerical integration). What a pitty.
 

1) Version 2 is not a Maple file, try what was suggested

2) Version 3 has autoexecutable code and I do not accept that from 'unknowns' [especially in virtue of 1)]

1) Version 2 is not a Maple file, try what was suggested

2) Version 3 has autoexecutable code and I do not accept that from 'unknowns' [especially in virtue of 1)]

A second order Newton may be faster. Without need I do not use it, it bares the 'risk' of oscillating around the solution and needs more care, usually I prefer Brent's method.

What ever: this way there is no need to ask for accuracy and how many terms are needed :-)

But still I ask myself what the OP actually wants and what a series is worth on paper without anything additional.

A second order Newton may be faster. Without need I do not use it, it bares the 'risk' of oscillating around the solution and needs more care, usually I prefer Brent's method.

What ever: this way there is no need to ask for accuracy and how many terms are needed :-)

But still I ask myself what the OP actually wants and what a series is worth on paper without anything additional.

yes?

yes?

Well, no special characters should be used ...

If you take you file, change the extension to html and open it with a browser than you can see what it is: not a Maple file

PS: I will not look into 16991_Version3.mw because it has autoexecutable code, which is too risky for my taste

Well, no special characters should be used ...

If you take you file, change the extension to html and open it with a browser than you can see what it is: not a Maple file

PS: I will not look into 16991_Version3.mw because it has autoexecutable code, which is too risky for my taste

The other way round it seems to be ok:

Int(BesselK(1,t)*t^2,t=0..x) = int(BesselK(1,t)*t^2,t=0..infinity) - int(BesselK(1,t)*t^2,t=x..infinity);

    x
   /
  |                  2           2
  |   BesselK(1, t) t  dt = 2 - x  BesselK(0, x) - 2 x BesselK(1, x)
  |
 /
   0

> limit(%,x=0);

                                0 = 0

BTW: Wolfram refuses to give an answer (which is better than a wrong one):
www.wolframalpha.com/input/ (dito for t = x ... infinity)
 

I hope your instructor uses Maple. And reads that forum ...

1) So you do not want numerical values (as you said).
2) You have already been given the answer by Alec.

convert(LambertW(z), Sum) assuming abs(z) < 1/exp(1);
W:=unapply(%,z);
eval(s, LambertW=W);

I hope your instructor uses Maple. And reads that forum ...

1) So you do not want numerical values (as you said).
2) You have already been given the answer by Alec.

convert(LambertW(z), Sum) assuming abs(z) < 1/exp(1);
W:=unapply(%,z);
eval(s, LambertW=W);

Hello acer,

Thx, that's good to know (though I tend to have it forgotten when I would need it ... one more thread to file ...) !

Yes, explicit options would be much better

Hello acer,

Thx, that's good to know (though I tend to have it forgotten when I would need it ... one more thread to file ...) !

Yes, explicit options would be much better