Preben Alsholm

13728 Reputation

22 Badges

20 years, 249 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by Preben Alsholm

This is just a continuation of

http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/142296-Pade-Approximation

Whether what you write is correct or not surely depends on what you intend to do.

You haven't answered the questions put by Carl Love and MacDude and now repeated by me:
Why approximate a series truncated to 3 terms (now a polynomial of degree 6 called f) by a more complicated expression e?

You are talking about finding a pade approximation to the original function. But you don't tell us what the original function is.

It doesn't happen with 1D-input (Maple input).

( Your expressions are not strings in the Maple sense (unless of course expression1:="Hello world"; ). )

@Alejandro Jakubi Just tried the same. I think you are right.

@Alejandro Jakubi Just tried the same. I think you are right.

There seems to be a syntax error. Copying it I got "Error, `;` unexpected".

Could you upload a worksheet instead?

@Thomas Richard Actually even

simplify(s) assuming a>0;

works.

You are using 'a' as a function of two variables (x and v), but it is never defined as such. However, you also use it without arguments, so you are not being consistent. In any case for the algorithm to run you have to define 'a'.

You are using 'a' as a function of two variables (x and v), but it is never defined as such. However, you also use it without arguments, so you are not being consistent. In any case for the algorithm to run you have to define 'a'.

@Markiyan Hirnyk It was put there by hand. I was observing that the integral was bounded by 1/(2*(8+x^3)^2) thus is O(1/x^6)). Since the first term in res2 is also  O(1/x^6)), the result follows.

@Markiyan Hirnyk It was put there by hand. I was observing that the integral was bounded by 1/(2*(8+x^3)^2) thus is O(1/x^6)). Since the first term in res2 is also  O(1/x^6)), the result follows.

@Markiyan Hirnyk This is for getting the u-factor, i.e. the factor to be differentiated. The point is that we want to have cos(s) (and sin(s) later) as the factor to be integrated.

@Markiyan Hirnyk This is for getting the u-factor, i.e. the factor to be differentiated. The point is that we want to have cos(s) (and sin(s) later) as the factor to be integrated.

The system (as I wrote it above) is linear. It has exactly one solution, and Maple finds it. No RootOf is used.
So I wonder what you are doing.

The command

solve(eqns, {Citcyt, Citmt, Malmt, Pyrmt}, useassumptions) assuming Citcyt > 0, Citmt > 0, Malmt > 0, Pyrmt > 0;

also just gives one solution. In addition it gives conditions under which the unknowns are positive.

The system (as I wrote it above) is linear. It has exactly one solution, and Maple finds it. No RootOf is used.
So I wonder what you are doing.

The command

solve(eqns, {Citcyt, Citmt, Malmt, Pyrmt}, useassumptions) assuming Citcyt > 0, Citmt > 0, Malmt > 0, Pyrmt > 0;

also just gives one solution. In addition it gives conditions under which the unknowns are positive.

Notice that there is no difference between the name T and the name `T`.
However, something like `T ` (i.e. a space after T) would be different from T. That is why in my comment above I called the same quantity Tseq.

First 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 Last Page 186 of 230