acer

33400 Reputation

29 Badges

20 years, 331 days
Ontario, Canada

Social Networks and Content at Maplesoft.com

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by acer

Why does your Question (and followup Reply to vv) contain various blank portions? Are those supposed to contain missing details?

@mary120 Why did you not mention before that you are using Maple 11!  That was released thirteeen years ago, and is now 13 major releases out of date.

You could try one of these options:

   legend=('n[`0p`]'/'n[`0i`]'=0.1)

or,

   legend=`#mfrac(msub(mi("n"),mi("0p")),msub(mi("n"),mi("0i")))`

   

@mary120 You could use options such as,

  legend=typeset(n__0p/n__0n=0.1), legendstyle=[font=[Helvetica,10]]

where you adjust the font name as size as desired. Note that I used a double-underscore to get the subscripting.

@faizfrhn Please don't submit the question more than once.

You've incorrectly used square-brackets [...] instead of round-brackets (...) as delimiters in your expression for eq3.

Also, did you mean Pi/4 instead of 90? Maple's trig sommands work with radians.

Also, in the term sin(((beta + 90 + delta) - beta) + phi)) there is a +beta added to a -beta. Is that intentional, or did you mean something else?

 

[edited] Put your followup questions as Comments here, instead of in a separate Question thread.

Here is something more programmatic (ie. hopefully more systematic and less ad hoc). I'm trying to keep in mind the OP's mention of pulling out the H (akin to factoring in some sense).

I expect there is room for improvement. I tried to make it not expand terms. I didn't stress-test it.

The main idea is to not have to determine visually (and specifiy manually) which multiplicative term to adjust, or by what power of H.

At the end, for fun, it's also used to pull out other "factors".

restart;

eq := W__1 + W__2 = -sin(-beta + alpha)*((H^2 - h^2)*gamma
                    + h^2*psi)/(2*sin(beta)*sin(alpha));

W__1+W__2 = -(1/2)*sin(-beta+alpha)*((H^2-h^2)*gamma+h^2*psi)/(sin(beta)*sin(alpha))

targ := W__1 + W__2 = -H^2*sin(-beta + alpha)*((1 - h^2/H^2)*gamma
                    + h^2*psi/H^2)/(2*sin(beta)*sin(alpha));
 

W__1+W__2 = -(1/2)*H^2*sin(-beta+alpha)*((1-h^2/H^2)*gamma+h^2*psi/H^2)/(sin(beta)*sin(alpha))

F := proc(ee::`*`,T::name)
  local a,c,count,d,o,p,P,q;
  (a,o) := selectremove(type,[op(ee)],
                    And(`+`,polynom(anything,T),
                        satisfies(p->degree(p,T)>0)));
  count:=0; P:=1;
  if nops(a)>0 then
    for p in a do
      d := degree(p,T); count := count+d;
      (c,q) := selectremove(type,[op(p)],`*`);
      P := P*`+`(op(map(`/`,q,T^d)),map(u->F(u,T)/T^d,c)[]);
    end do;
  end if;
  `*`(P,T^count,op(o));
end proc:

 

answer := lhs(eq) = F(rhs(eq), H);

W__1+W__2 = -(1/2)*H^2*sin(-beta+alpha)*((1-h^2/H^2)*gamma+h^2*psi/H^2)/(sin(beta)*sin(alpha))

evalb(simplify(answer-eq)), evalb(answer=targ);

true, true

# for fun...
lhs(eq) = F(rhs(eq), h); evalb(simplify(%-eq));
lhs(eq) = F(rhs(eq), gamma); evalb(simplify(%-eq));
lhs(eq) = F(rhs(eq), psi); evalb(simplify(%-eq));

W__1+W__2 = -(1/2)*((H^2/h^2-1)*gamma+psi)*h^2*sin(-beta+alpha)/(sin(beta)*sin(alpha))

true

W__1+W__2 = -(1/2)*(H^2-h^2+h^2*psi/gamma)*gamma*sin(-beta+alpha)/(sin(beta)*sin(alpha))

true

W__1+W__2 = -(1/2)*((H^2-h^2)*gamma/psi+h^2)*psi*sin(-beta+alpha)/(sin(beta)*sin(alpha))

true

 

Download manipulation.mw

 

@nguyenhuyenag I never claimed that it would work for every other problem you concocted. That's why I wrote particular in italics.

If you are trying to ask something else, something more general, then ask it clearly.

In a related way that happens to work quickly for this particular example (but without reliance on identify),

restart;

L := {m[4]+4*m[7]+m[10]+m[13]+m[16]+m[19]+m[22] = 2*sqrt(2)+7,
 m[15]+3*m[18]+11*m[21]+m[6]+9*m[12]+2*m[3]-2*sqrt(2)*m[18]+6*sqrt(2)*m[21]
 -4*sqrt(2)*m[12]+m[24] = 2*sqrt(2)+61, -4*sqrt(2)*m[14]+6*m[14]+m[17]
 +11*m[20]+m[2]+4*m[5]+18*m[8]+6*sqrt(2)*m[20]-8*sqrt(2)*m[8]+m[23]
 = 2*sqrt(2)+34, m[27]-2*sqrt(2)*m[19]+4*sqrt(2)*m[7]+2*sqrt(2)*m[13]
 -2*m[16]+m[17]-6*m[19]-4*m[4]+m[5]+m[20]-16*m[7]+4*m[8]+m[11]-4*m[13]
 +m[14] = 6*sqrt(2)-6, m[28]+2*sqrt(2)*m[19]-4*sqrt(2)*m[10]-2*sqrt(2)*m[16]
 +m[15]+2*m[16]+m[18]+2*m[4]+m[6]+6*m[19]+m[21]+4*m[9]+2*m[10]+m[12]-2*m[13]
  = 6*sqrt(2)+21, m[25]+6*sqrt(2)*m[19]-2*sqrt(2)*m[20]-8*sqrt(2)*m[7]
 +4*sqrt(2)*m[8]-4*sqrt(2)*m[13]+2*sqrt(2)*m[14]+6*m[13]-4*m[14]+m[16]
 -2*m[17]+m[1]+4*m[4]+11*m[19]-6*m[20]-4*m[5]+18*m[7]-16*m[8] = 6*sqrt(2)-33,
 m[26]+6*sqrt(2)*m[19]+2*sqrt(2)*m[21]-4*sqrt(2)*m[10]-4*sqrt(2)*m[12]
 -2*sqrt(2)*m[16]-2*sqrt(2)*m[18]+m[13]-2*m[15]+3*m[16]+2*m[18]+2*m[1]
 +11*m[19]+6*m[21]+m[4]+2*m[6]+9*m[10]+2*m[12] = 6*sqrt(2)-33, m[29]
 +2*sqrt(2)*m[18]+6*sqrt(2)*m[20]-12*sqrt(2)*m[21]-2*sqrt(2)*m[3]
 -4*sqrt(2)*m[11]-2*sqrt(2)*m[15]-2*sqrt(2)*m[17]+m[14]+4*m[15]+3*m[17]
 -2*m[18]+2*m[2]+11*m[20]-22*m[21]+m[5]-4*m[6]+9*m[11] = 6*sqrt(2)-6, m[30]
 -12*sqrt(2)*m[20]+6*sqrt(2)*m[21]-2*sqrt(2)*m[2]-8*sqrt(2)*m[9]
 -2*sqrt(2)*m[14]-4*sqrt(2)*m[15]+2*sqrt(2)*m[17]+4*m[14]+6*m[15]-2*m[17]
 +m[18]+m[3]-22*m[20]+11*m[21]-4*m[5]+4*m[6]+18*m[9] = 6*sqrt(2)+21,
 -4*m[4]+2*m[5]+2*m[17]-2*m[18]-22*m[19]+6*m[20]-6*m[21]-2*m[16]-4*m[15]
 +m[31]-4*m[6]-16*m[9]+2*m[11]+4*m[13]-2*m[14]-2*sqrt(2)*m[1]+4*sqrt(2)*m[9]
 -2*sqrt(2)*m[17]-4*sqrt(2)*m[11]+2*sqrt(2)*m[15]+2*sqrt(2)*m[16]
 -12*sqrt(2)*m[19]-2*sqrt(2)*m[13]+2*sqrt(2)*m[20]-2*sqrt(2)*m[21]
 = 12*sqrt(2)-120}:

S:=Optimization:-LPSolve(1,L,map(u->u=0..infinity,
                                 indets(L,And(name,Not(constant))))[])[2]:

C2:=solve(eval(L,lhs~(select(type,S,name=0.0))=~0))
    union (lhs~(select(type,{S[]},name=0.0))=~0);

{m[1] = 0, m[2] = 0, m[3] = (261/7)*2^(1/2)-309/7, m[4] = 0, m[5] = 0, m[6] = 0, m[7] = 219/98-(61/49)*2^(1/2), m[8] = -22/7+(23/7)*2^(1/2), m[9] = -(51/14)*2^(1/2)+114/7, m[10] = -95/49+(342/49)*2^(1/2), m[11] = 0, m[12] = -(8/7)*2^(1/2)+109/7, m[13] = 0, m[14] = 0, m[15] = 0, m[16] = 0, m[17] = 0, m[18] = 0, m[19] = 0, m[20] = 366/7-36*2^(1/2), m[21] = 0, m[22] = 0, m[23] = 0, m[24] = 0, m[25] = 0, m[26] = 0, m[27] = 0, m[28] = 0, m[29] = 0, m[30] = 0, m[31] = 0}

normal(eval(map(lhs-rhs,L),C2));

{0}

 

Download LPSolve_ex2e.mw

@abdulganiy There are many more ways than this. Here are a few of them.

restart;
plot(ln(1+sin(Pi*x)), x = 0 .. 1, legend = numerical,
     style = point, symbol = box, color = blue,
     symbolsize = 15, numpoints = 8, adaptive=false);

restart;
f:=unapply(ln(1+sin(Pi*x)),x):
V:=Vector(8,i->0+(i-1)*(1-0)/(8-1)):
plot(<V|f~(V)>, legend = numerical, symbolsize = 15,
     style = point, symbol = box, color = blue);

restart;
f:=unapply(ln(1+sin(Pi*x)),x):
N,a,b := 8,0,1:
V:=Vector(N,i->a+(i-1)*(b-a)/(N-1)):
plot(<V|f~(V)>, legend = numerical, symbolsize = 15,
     style = point, symbol = box, color = blue);

restart;
f:=unapply(ln(1+sin(Pi*x)),x):
V:=<[seq(0..1,(1-0)/(8-1))]>:
plot(<V|f~(V)>, legend = numerical, symbolsize = 15,
     style = point, symbol = box, color = blue);

restart;
N,a,b := 8,0,1:
f:=unapply(ln(1+sin(Pi*x)),x):
V:=<[seq(a..b,(b-a)/(N-1))]>:
plots:-pointplot(<V|f~(V)>, legend = numerical, symbolsize = 15,
                 symbol = box, color = blue);

 

Download ptplot_misc.mw

 

@nguyenhuyenag 

restart;

L := {m[4]+4*m[7]+m[10]+m[13]+m[16]+m[19]+m[22] = 2*sqrt(2)+7,
 m[15]+3*m[18]+11*m[21]+m[6]+9*m[12]+2*m[3]-2*sqrt(2)*m[18]+6*sqrt(2)*m[21]
 -4*sqrt(2)*m[12]+m[24] = 2*sqrt(2)+61, -4*sqrt(2)*m[14]+6*m[14]+m[17]
 +11*m[20]+m[2]+4*m[5]+18*m[8]+6*sqrt(2)*m[20]-8*sqrt(2)*m[8]+m[23]
 = 2*sqrt(2)+34, m[27]-2*sqrt(2)*m[19]+4*sqrt(2)*m[7]+2*sqrt(2)*m[13]
 -2*m[16]+m[17]-6*m[19]-4*m[4]+m[5]+m[20]-16*m[7]+4*m[8]+m[11]-4*m[13]
 +m[14] = 6*sqrt(2)-6, m[28]+2*sqrt(2)*m[19]-4*sqrt(2)*m[10]-2*sqrt(2)*m[16]
 +m[15]+2*m[16]+m[18]+2*m[4]+m[6]+6*m[19]+m[21]+4*m[9]+2*m[10]+m[12]-2*m[13]
  = 6*sqrt(2)+21, m[25]+6*sqrt(2)*m[19]-2*sqrt(2)*m[20]-8*sqrt(2)*m[7]
 +4*sqrt(2)*m[8]-4*sqrt(2)*m[13]+2*sqrt(2)*m[14]+6*m[13]-4*m[14]+m[16]
 -2*m[17]+m[1]+4*m[4]+11*m[19]-6*m[20]-4*m[5]+18*m[7]-16*m[8] = 6*sqrt(2)-33,
 m[26]+6*sqrt(2)*m[19]+2*sqrt(2)*m[21]-4*sqrt(2)*m[10]-4*sqrt(2)*m[12]
 -2*sqrt(2)*m[16]-2*sqrt(2)*m[18]+m[13]-2*m[15]+3*m[16]+2*m[18]+2*m[1]
 +11*m[19]+6*m[21]+m[4]+2*m[6]+9*m[10]+2*m[12] = 6*sqrt(2)-33, m[29]
 +2*sqrt(2)*m[18]+6*sqrt(2)*m[20]-12*sqrt(2)*m[21]-2*sqrt(2)*m[3]
 -4*sqrt(2)*m[11]-2*sqrt(2)*m[15]-2*sqrt(2)*m[17]+m[14]+4*m[15]+3*m[17]
 -2*m[18]+2*m[2]+11*m[20]-22*m[21]+m[5]-4*m[6]+9*m[11] = 6*sqrt(2)-6, m[30]
 -12*sqrt(2)*m[20]+6*sqrt(2)*m[21]-2*sqrt(2)*m[2]-8*sqrt(2)*m[9]
 -2*sqrt(2)*m[14]-4*sqrt(2)*m[15]+2*sqrt(2)*m[17]+4*m[14]+6*m[15]-2*m[17]
 +m[18]+m[3]-22*m[20]+11*m[21]-4*m[5]+4*m[6]+18*m[9] = 6*sqrt(2)+21,
 -4*m[4]+2*m[5]+2*m[17]-2*m[18]-22*m[19]+6*m[20]-6*m[21]-2*m[16]-4*m[15]
 +m[31]-4*m[6]-16*m[9]+2*m[11]+4*m[13]-2*m[14]-2*sqrt(2)*m[1]+4*sqrt(2)*m[9]
 -2*sqrt(2)*m[17]-4*sqrt(2)*m[11]+2*sqrt(2)*m[15]+2*sqrt(2)*m[16]
 -12*sqrt(2)*m[19]-2*sqrt(2)*m[13]+2*sqrt(2)*m[20]-2*sqrt(2)*m[21]
 = 12*sqrt(2)-120}:

Digits:=60:
S:=Optimization:-LPSolve(1,L,map(u->u=0..infinity,
                                 indets(L,And(name,Not(constant))))[])[2]:
Digits:=15:

C:=identify(S);

[m[1] = 0, m[2] = 0, m[3] = -309/7+(261/7)*2^(1/2), m[4] = 0, m[5] = 0, m[6] = 0, m[7] = 219/98-(61/49)*2^(1/2), m[8] = -22/7+(23/7)*2^(1/2), m[9] = 114/7-(51/14)*2^(1/2), m[10] = -95/49+(342/49)*2^(1/2), m[11] = 0, m[12] = 109/7-(8/7)*2^(1/2), m[13] = 0, m[14] = 0, m[15] = 0, m[16] = 0, m[17] = 0, m[18] = 0, m[19] = 0, m[20] = 366/7-36*2^(1/2), m[21] = 0, m[22] = 0, m[23] = 0, m[24] = 0, m[25] = 0, m[26] = 0, m[27] = 0, m[28] = 0, m[29] = 0, m[30] = 0, m[31] = 0]

normal(eval(map(lhs-rhs,L),C));

{0}

 

Download LPSolve_ex2.mw

@Carl Love That is very unfortunate programming of the Java GUI.

(I spend so much time in the commandline interface that I reflexively think of its sane behaviour as "the normal manner".)

I will submit a bug report.

@Carl Love I agree with what you've written, except that I don't see it respecting interface(verboseproc) in the usual manner.

@pik1432 FYI, two solutions for the new system can also be found (quickly) as follows:

RootFinding:-Isolate(evalf[100]((lhs-rhs)~([f1,f2,f3,f4,f5,f6,f7,f8,f9,f10])),
                     [vars[]],maxroots=3,digits=20);

Q_ac_20200811_ac2.mw

You could start by providing us with details of what you did to obtain this.

You can upload and attach a Worksheet to a Comment or Question here. Use the green up-arrow in the Mapleprimes editor.

@Reshu Gupta 

G:=x -> -1.50000000000*x - 0.0170454545454*(x^4 + 17.6721666667*x^2
 - 5.11042142857)*x - 0.0197950153310*exp(-4.47213595500*x)
 + 0.0197950153310*exp(4.47213595500*x)
 + 6.62030572935*10^(-13)*(-92400.*x^4 - 82645.0724484*x^3 + 526680.*x^2
  + 241736.836912*x + 27027.)*exp(-4.47213595500*x + 4.47213595500)
  + 6.62030572935*10^(-13)*(92400.*x^4 - 82645.0724484*x^3 - 526680.*x^2
  + 241736.836912*x - 27027.)*exp(4.47213595500*x + 4.47213595500):
V:=Vector([seq(G(x),x=[seq(-1..1,0.1)])]):
P1:=plot(<<[seq(-1..1,0.1)]>|V>,style=point):
P2:=plot(G,-1..1):
plots:-display(P1,P2);
ExcelTools:-Export(V, "foo.xls");
First 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 Last Page 182 of 612