nm

11378 Reputation

20 Badges

13 years, 42 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are questions asked by nm

I have noticed this before few times. I wonder if others have seen it.

When I have Maple open, (with may be few worksheets open) and not being used at all for anything and it is not running anything, after sometime (say 2-4 hrs or more), when I go back to using Maple, I find the GUI unresponsive. Nothing happens. Clicking on anything does nothing, It is frozen. Resizing the window, it become black and does not repaint.  

But If I wait about 5-10 minutes after doing this window resizing, it suddenly becomes responsive again and it become alive again.  This happened twice this week, where I was about to just kill Maple. Good thing I did not.

It feels like the Maple process/frontend went to sleep when not being used, and it takes few minutes to wake it up by shaking the window. I do not know what else could explain this.

This is windows 10. Latest updates and lots of RAM and nothing else is running on the PC at this time.

I go take a nap, come back and notice this. It does not happen all the time, but noticed it twice this week.

Any others seen this problem? Does Maple process go to sleep or hibernate when it detects it is not being used for sometime? Looking at task manager when this happens, I see no CPU activity at all and no memory changes at all in any of the servers.exe. So I think this might be a GUI issue, where Java go to sleep or something.   

Or it could be a windows 10 issue and not Maple. But I only noticed this with Maple where it seems to go to sleep when not used.

This is second order ode solved using series method. This problem from textbook. The solution given by Maple does not match the book. I also solved this by hand and my hand solution agrees with the text book. I also solved this using Mathematica and its solution agrees with the book. 

Maple solution does not agree with the book for y2.  i.e. the general solution for this problem has the form 

    y= c_1 * y1 + c_2* (  y1 * ln(x)  +  y2 )

This is a Frobenius series method, since regular singular point and it falls into the hard case, where roots of indicial equation has difference of integer and where the second solution y2 can't be obtained using same method as y1 due to being undefined if using same method. So it require adjustment to the Frobenius series method.

This is ode

restart;
Order:=10;
ode:=x*diff(y(x),x$2)-3*diff(y(x),x)+x*y(x)=0;
dsolve(ode,y(x),'series')

Maple says that

   y2 = -144 - 36*x^2 + 1/2*x^6 - 25/1024*x^8 + ...)

First, it is missing x^4. And not able to make other coefficients match book. Book says y2 should be

   y2 = 1 + x^2/4 + x^4/64 - (11 x^6)/2304 + ....

And that is what I get and also Mathematica:

I do not have screen shot now of the page from the book to show. It is from an old textbook. Will try to make screen shot if needed.  This is problem 5, page 212 from SCHAUM's "differential equations" by Frank Ayers. 1952 edition. There is free PDF files on the net. Here is screen shot

My question is, why is Maple's series soluiton for the second basis solution y2 different? Could someone verify this? It also failes to verify it

restart;
ode:=x*diff(y(x),x$2)-3*diff(y(x),x)+x*y(x)=0;
Order:=10;
sol:=dsolve(ode,y(x),'series');
odetest(sol,ode,'series','point'=0)

 

Update

I've testsed few more problems, solved by hand and verified using Mathematica. All these problems give wrong solution by Maple for y_2. At least the solutions do not match the book and do not match my hand solution and do not match Mathematica. In all cases Mathematica's solution and my hand solution match the book. 

All these problem fall into the same difficult case of Frobenius series, where roots of indicial equation differ by integer and where y_2 can not be obtained directly using similar method used to obtain y_1. Other cases of Frobenius roots, Maple give complete correct general solutions. It is only this case where there seems to be something wrong.

In all of these problems below, y_1 solution is correct. It is the last series in y_2 shown which does not agree with book and it is this part which require using modifed method to obtain as explained on the book where these problems are solved from the above links. All the books used can be found online.

Please see attached worksheet.
 

interface(version);

`Standard Worksheet Interface, Maple 2022.2, Windows 10, October 23 2022 Build ID 1657361`

#problem  problem 5, page 212 from SCHAUM's "differential equations" by Frank Ayers. 1952 edition.
ode:=x*diff(y(x),x$2)-3*diff(y(x),x)+x*y(x)=0:
sol:=dsolve(ode,y(x),'series');
odetest(sol,ode,'series','point'=0)

y(x) = c__1*x^4*(series(1-(1/12)*x^2+(1/384)*x^4-(1/23040)*x^6+(1/2211840)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))+c__2*(ln(x)*(series(9*x^4-(3/4)*x^6+(3/128)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))+(series(-144-36*x^2+(1/2)*x^6-(25/1024)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10)))

Warning, unable to compute series necessary to test the given solution

FAIL

#page 19, example 5. NASA report TR R-390. By Gabriel Allen (PDF online)
ode:=x^2*diff(y(x),x$2)+x*diff(y(x),x)+(x^2-4)*y(x)=0:
sol:=dsolve(ode,y(x),'series');
odetest(sol,ode,'series','point'=0)

y(x) = c__1*x^2*(series(1-(1/12)*x^2+(1/384)*x^4-(1/23040)*x^6+(1/2211840)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))+c__2*(ln(x)*(series(9*x^4-(3/4)*x^6+(3/128)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))/x^2+(series(-144-36*x^2+(1/2)*x^6-(25/1024)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))/x^2)

Warning, unable to compute series necessary to test the given solution

FAIL

# problem 20.6, page 114 from SCHAUM's "differential equations" by Richard Bronson. 1978 edition.
ode:=x^2*diff(y(x),x$2)+(x^2-2*x)*diff(y(x),x)+2*y(x)=0:
sol:=dsolve(ode,y(x),'series');
odetest(sol,ode,'series','point'=0)

y(x) = c__1*x^2*(series(1-x+(1/2)*x^2-(1/6)*x^3+(1/24)*x^4-(1/120)*x^5+(1/720)*x^6-(1/5040)*x^7+(1/40320)*x^8-(1/362880)*x^9+O(x^10),x,10))+c__2*(x*ln(x)*(series(-x+x^2-(1/2)*x^3+(1/6)*x^4-(1/24)*x^5+(1/120)*x^6-(1/720)*x^7+(1/5040)*x^8-(1/40320)*x^9+O(x^10),x,10))+x*(series(1-x+(1/4)*x^3-(5/36)*x^4+(13/288)*x^5-(77/7200)*x^6+(29/14400)*x^7-(223/705600)*x^8+(481/11289600)*x^9+O(x^10),x,10)))

Warning, unable to compute series necessary to test the given solution

FAIL

# problem 20.7, page 115 from SCHAUM's "differential equations" by Richard Bronson. 1978 edition.
ode:=x^2*diff(y(x),x$2)+x*diff(y(x),x)+(x^2-1)*y(x)=0:
sol:=dsolve(ode,y(x),'series');
odetest(sol,ode,'series','point'=0)

y(x) = c__1*x*(series(1-(1/8)*x^2+(1/192)*x^4-(1/9216)*x^6+(1/737280)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))+c__2*(ln(x)*(series(x^2-(1/8)*x^4+(1/192)*x^6-(1/9216)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))/x+(series(-2+(3/32)*x^4-(7/1152)*x^6+(35/221184)*x^8+O(x^10),x,10))/x)

Warning, unable to compute series necessary to test the given solution

FAIL

 


 

Download series_solutions_Frob_difference_integer.mw

 

From https://maplesoft.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_qidPG4qHRWGiTyO65vnGpw?timezone_id=Europe%2FParis

Is the recording of  Sneak Peek at Maple 2023 made on march 1,  available anywhere to see on Maple website or somewhere else? 

Update

Recording is at https://www.maplesoft.com/webinars/recorded/featured.aspx?id=2100  but need to first register/login if you are memeber of maplesoft.com

"The recording will start immediately after filling out the form."

What is the reason Maple likes to do this

arccos(sin(x));

         Pi/2 - arcsin(sin(x))

Both are correct, but the first has leaf count of only 3 and the second expression has leaf count of 11.

Surely the first is simpler to look at and read so the second form is not simpler.

What is the logic behind this automatic transformation? And did Maple always do this?

Found integration problem which causes server.exe to crash each time. I hope this can be used to help find why server.exe keeps crashing much more than before in Maple 2022.

 

This happens each time. The above is a typical example of what I have been saying all the time above server.exe crashing. It should not do that. If it can not solve the problem, it should simply return.

I hope these problems will be fixed in Maple 2023.

Any one can figure why it crashes?

Attached worksheet.


 

interface(version);

`Standard Worksheet Interface, Maple 2022.2, Windows 10, October 23 2022 Build ID 1657361`

restart;

integrand:=(2*x^2022+1)/(x^2023+x);
int(integrand,x);

(2*x^2022+1)/(x^2023+x)


 

Download crash_feb_3_2023.mw

 

First 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Last Page 56 of 200