Hi,
want to solve this equation for t but getting 'Solutions may be lost' error.
eq3 := exp(-1/k*t)*k/(1+k^2)+(-cos(t)*k+sin(t))/(1+k^2);
solve(eq3=0, t);
Solutions maybe lost.
Is this too much for the symbolic engine? Does anyone know of a technique to solve this type of equation?
Appreciated.
solving
A better method is to use RootOf (and to multiply by 1+k^2), but it gives no 'answer'
even after applying 'allvalues'.
You may want to interprete it as: "the system can not provide a satisfactory answer
automatically in terms of its known functions", so it is quite likely that there is none
(even if there may be a solution [depending on conditions for k]).
Of course t=0 will do, but for others ...
exp(-t)-cos(t)+sin(t); # k=1 fsolve(%,t,complex,avoid={t=0.});symbolic in terms of k..
Is there a way to get solution for t in terms of k (symbolic) for the range of k values for which there exists solution? obviously k=0 is a discontinuity so possibly a symbolic solution t in terms of k for k=0.25..3?
cheers for help.
cant tends towards can/
for k=1 the inverse is not a function
for k=1 the inverse is not a function, see above ... I think there is no name for it (as already said)
may be you can use Langrange inversion in t=Pi or Pi/2 to write down a series
Inverse function?
How about solving for the inverse function? solve for k in terms of t...
solve(eq3,k) yields an answer, involving not only exp, sin, cos, but also LambertW.
k = t*sin(t)/(LambertW(-t/(exp(cos(t)*t/sin(t))*sin(t)))*sin(t)+cos(t)*t)
---
G A Edgar
Non-Algebraic
Even with k constant, this type of system is hard for solvers (Maple just returns a RootOf that allvalues doesn't expand as Axel points out and other computer algebra systems return similar things). Solvers can give symbolic answers to some exp-trig expressions but generally only if the answer can be found by replacing the exp and trig terms with symbols (i.e. if the solution is fundamentally algebraic and not analytic).
John
Another method
See my blog post about using dsolve on this problem. While I do not show a complete solution, at least things get 'closer'.