This is another bizzar behaviour of objects. I created a basic object of type person.  Noticed that after issuing the call copy(object,deep) and not doing anything at all with the result. Just made the call only, then I am not longer able to create new objects of this class. I had to restart the session to be able to create new objects again.

Why?  This seems like something went messy with memory layout. I put a print message in the constructor, and see that this message no longer show up  after the call copy(object,deep) even though this call was not used for any purpose as you see, but to only to see its effect on the session.

Any explanation why one can no longer create new objects after doing this?  Here is the workseet

Download deep_call_problem.mw

As I was trying things with Maple OOP, I noticed strange behavior which I do not understand. I'll explain the problem in words first then given an example.

I have Person class. Then made one instance of it. In this class, there is one method which is defined to take in an object of same type as the class itself.

I found when I pass the object itself to its own method, it gives an error that the method expects a second argument of type person which is missing. But it is not missing.

Then when creating a second object of same type, and passing the second object, it worked! 

Why?  Here is MWE. Attached worksheet.  I would have expected same behavior in both cases. EIther both work, or both do not work. As as long as the object being passed is the correct type (person).

It seems in the first case, Maple noticed the object being passed to the method happened to be same object where this method is, and it did not pass it. Hence the missing second argument.  Is this a documented behaviour somewhere? (I made sure to make all method static though, so same code is used by all instances of the class. This is strange error message).
 

Download why_first_call_fail.mw

Update

Ok, I am all set. I found a good way to do this. i.e. pass the object to one of its method. One has to make a copy of the object first and pass the copy. Can't use the same object. This is how I do it now. 

restart;
person:=module() 
    option object;
    export name::string:="";  

     export ModuleCopy::static:= overload( 
     [ 
         proc(_self,proto, $)option overload;
            print("Enter 2 args constructor of person");  
            #do nothing    
         end proc,

         proc(_self,proto, name::string, $) option overload; 
             print("Enter 3 args constructor of person");      
             _self:-name := name;
        end proc
     ]);

    export process::static:=proc(_self, the_input::person,$)
       print("the_input:-name = ",the_input:-name);
    end proc;
    
end module; 


p:=Object(person,"me");
#p:-process(p);  #instead of this do the following
o:=Object(p);
p:-process(o)

Which works and gives

              "Enter 3 args constructor of person"
                  p := Object<<2370600065568>>
              "Enter 2 args constructor of person"
                  o := Object<<2370600048288>>
                   "the_input:-name = ", "me"

So I am now able to pass the object (or rather copy of it) as explicit argument to other methods and other modules.  I am not sure why it does not work when using the object itself and had to make a copy. 

I am still struggling understanding Maple Object  inheritance due to lack of good examples and sparse documenation.

This is what I am trying to do. I have base class Person, and then make Employee class which extends Person class and adds new field.   

The constructor to the Employee class then needs to call the constructor to the Person class (its base class) in order to initialize it. The base class constuctor takes care of initialization the fields in the base class.

I do not know how to do this. Actually it is not clear to me how the proto argument gets into play in all of this. I could not find one example that explains how to use proto with inheritance.

I am trying to implement this python example. I will show the code for the Python, and my Maple translation. The part I do not know how to do, it how to call the constructor for the base class from the sub class.  If I do not do this, then the fields of the base class will remain unitilized.

Python example is from https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/python-access-parent-class-attribute/

# parent class 
class Person( object ):     
    
        # __init__ is known as the constructor          
        def __init__(self, name, idnumber):    
                self.name = name 
                self.idnumber = idnumber 
                  
        def display(self): 
                print(self.name) 
                print(self.idnumber) 
    
# child class 
class Employee( Person ):            
        def __init__(self, name, idnumber, salary): 
                self.salary = salary 
    
                # invoking the constructor of the parent class  
                #----->>>>> HOW TO DO THIS IN MAPLE?
                Person.__init__(self, name, idnumber)  
          
        def show(self):
            print(self.salary)

# creation of an object
# variable or an instance 
a = Employee('Rahul', 886012, 30000000)     
    
# calling a function of the
# class Person using Employee's
# class instance 
a.display()
a.show() 

Here is the Maple code

restart;
person:=module() 
    option object; 
    #I made these exported instead of local for ease of printing from outside while
    #debugging , that is all.. These should otherwise be local

    export idnumber::integer:=0;  
    export name::string:="";  

    export ModuleCopy::static:= proc( _self, proto, name::string, idnumber::integer, $) 
        _self:-idnumber := idnumber;
        _self:-name := name;
    end proc;
 
end module; 
#---- extend the above class 

employee:=module() 
    option object(person); 
    export salary::integer:=0;  

    ModuleCopy::static:= proc( _self, proto, name::string, idnumber::integer, salary::integer , $) 
        _self:-salary := salary;
        # invoking the constructor of the parent class  
        # How to do that in Maple?

        #I could always manually do this. But I do not want to duplicate the code
        #done by the base class constructor.
        #_self:-name := name;
        #_self:-idnumber := idnumber;
        
    end proc;
 
end module; 

How does one do the Python example in Maple?

Someone should write a book on programming using OOP in Maple. I'll buy a copy in advance.

Maple 2022.1

I need to make my base class local variable static, so that when extending the class, the subclass will share these variable and use their current values as set by the base class. If I do not make them static, then the base class when extended, will get fresh instance of these variable, losing their original values, which is not what I want.

To do this, one must make the base class variables static

This works, but now I do not know the syntax where to put the type on the variable. 

I can't write   local m::integer::static; nor local m::static::integer;

I could only write local m::static; but this means I lost the ability to have a type on the variable and lost some of the type checking which is nice to have in Maple. From Maple help:

Here is example

restart;

base_class:=module()
  option object;
  local n::static;  #I want this type to ::integer also. But do not know how

  export set_n::static:=proc(_self,n::integer,$)
     _self:-n := n;
  end proc;
  
  export process::static:=proc(_self,$)
    local o;
    o:=Object(sub_class);
    o:-process();
  end proc;
end module;    

sub_class:=module()
   option object(base_class);
   process:=proc(_self,$)
      print("in sub class. _self:-n = ",_self:-n);
   end proc;
end module;

o:=Object(base_class);
o:-set_n(10);
o:-process()


            "in sub class. _self:-n = ", 10

The above is all working OK. I just would like to make n in the base class of type ::integer as well as ::static

Is there a syntax for doing this?

The suggested solution in the answer https://mapleprimes.com/questions/234325-Use-Of-self--Inside-Object-Constructor  worked OK in the setup shown in that question.

But it does not work when putting the constructor inside overload

Here is an example where it works (i.e. by removing the type from _self as suggested in the above answer)

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    local name::string:="";

    #notice no _self::person, just _self
    export ModuleCopy::static:= proc( _self, proto::person, the_name::string, $ )            
           name:= the_name;
    end proc;

end module;


p:=Object(person,"me")

The above works. But since I have different constructors, once I put the above inside overload, using the same exact syntax, now the error comes back

restart;

person:=module()
    option object;
    local name::string:="";

    export ModuleCopy::static:= overload( 
    [
       proc( _self, proto::person, the_name::string, $ ) option overload;           
           name:= the_name;
      end proc
    ]);

end module;
             

p:=Object(person,"me")

Error, static procedure `ModuleCopy` refers to non-static local or export `name::string` in surrounding scope

I did not expect that using overload will cause any change to how it behaves. Is this a bug?

Below is worksheet also.

Download OO_version.mw