I have an expression like this:
B0:=(phi(x))^2:
B1:=diff(phi(x),x):
B2:=diff(phi(x),x,x):
B3:=B2^2:
B4:=(phi(x))^2:
B5:=B1^2:

C0:=(psi(x))^2:
C1:=diff(psi(x),x):
C2:=:C1^2:
C3:=

D0:=(eta(x))^2:

F1:=phi(x)*psi(x):
F2:=phi(x)*eta(x):
F3:=psi(x)*eta(x):

g1:=B1*C1:
g2:=B2*phi(x):
g3:=B2*psi(x):
g4:=B2*eta(x):

T:=A0011*B0+A0022*C0+A0033*D0+A0012*F1+A0013*F2+A0023*F3+A1111*B5+A1122*C2+A1112*g1+A2011*g2+A2012*g3+A2013*g4+A2211*B5:

A0011 and A0022 and etc are constants and coefficients.

Now I want to extract some constants like A1112 or A2013 from T. Please write out an useful code for extract these coefficients!

Thanks

SmithChart.mw
 If I want to plot Smith Chart ,how do I mark a circle of arbitrary values?

then,How do I avoid the polar line to cover other  circle line?

Any body can give me some ideas or better ways to plot Smith Chart?

Thanks.

Download SmithChart.mwSmithChart.mw

Dear Maple enthusiasts,

I am unable to find a working method to solve a system of 8 equations, of which 4 are differential equations. The system contains 8 unknown variables and the goal is to find an expression for each of these variables as a function of the time t. I have attached the code of my project at the bottom of this message.

I have tried the following:

1. Using solve/dsolve to solve all 8 equations at once. This results in Maple eating up all of my memory and never finishing its calculations.
2. First using solve to solve the 4 non-differential equations so that I get 4 out of 8 variables as a function of the 4 remaining variables. This results in an expression containing RootOf() for each of the 4 veriables I'm solving for, which prevents me from using these expressions in the 4 remaining differential equations.
3. First using dsolve to solve the differential equations, which gives once again an expression for 4 variables as a function of the 4 remaining variables. I then use solve to solve the 4 remaining equations with the new found expressions. This results in an extremely long solution for each of the variables.

The code below contains the 3rd option I tried.

Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I have been scratching my head so much that I'm getting bald and whatever I search for on google or in the Maple help, I can't find a good reference to a system of differential equations together with other equations.

Download Park_-_mixed_control_model.mw

Hello all of you,

I'm new here and I have a problem.

For homework I have to write a Maple package for the usage of dual quaternions. This is not a problem.

For example two functions of the package:

MyQuaternions := module()

  export Pretty, Ugly:
  local l1:
  option package:
 
  protect('i,j,k,epsilon'):
 
Pretty := proc(q::Vector)
  description "":
  return LinearAlgebra[Transpose](q)[1..4].Vector([1,i,j,k])+epsilon*(LinearAlgebra[Transpose](q)[5..8].Vector([1,i,j,k])):
end proc:

Ugly := proc(q)
  description "":
  local a;
  a := Vector(8);
  a[1]:=remove(has,remove(has,q,epsilon),{i,j,k});
  a[2]:=coeff(remove(has,q,epsilon),i,1);
  a[3]:=coeff(remove(has,q,epsilon),j,1);
  a[4]:=coeff(remove(has,q,epsilon),k,1);
  a[5]:=remove(has,coeff(q,epsilon),{i,j,k});
  a[6]:=coeff(coeff(q,epsilon),i,1);
  a[7]:=coeff(coeff(q,epsilon),j,1);
  a[8]:=coeff(coeff(q,epsilon),k,1);
  return a:
end proc:

end module:

savelib('MyQuaternions'):

Now I can load the module in a differnet maple worksheet "main.mw" by typing "with(MyQuaternions):"

The crucial thing now is the following: i,j,k,epsilon should be protected in "main.mw". I can do this by typing "protect('i,j,k,epsilon'):" Is there a way to tell maple to protect these variables automatically when the module is loaded? Or do I always have to type in the protect command by hand?

Thank you,

Josef

Hello,

how to write a^tilde , a^check on maple

thank,

Gerard.

Greetings to all!

Recently I encouter the following issue:

Maple (version 17) coudn't recognize that 20.0 equals with 20 and with 20.00. Believe me, this is very annoying!

Do I miss something? Is there any command that do the trick?

Thank you!

Giorgos K.

Hi,

   I have a set of linear equations in terms of Ax+B=0, where A and B are matrices.

  I used linsolve or LinearSolve to solve the equations.

   Is there any simple way to run linsolve/LinearSolve parallelly? suppose I already have matrices A and B.

Thank you very much

Hi,

I was wondering how I could assign small angel assumptions so that I could simplify an equation of motion to solve for theta double dot. Thank you for your help.

Download small_angle_assumption.mw

Download small_angle_assumption.mw

Hello,

How can I pde with maple?please explain completely,and other question :How can I solve pde with plot in maple because some questions dont have exact answer?

with(PolynomialIdeals):

quotientlist := Quotient(GB, varj[j]);
finallist2 := [];
for z from 1 to nops(quotientlist) do
if
finallist2 := [op(finallist2), op(z,quotientlist)];
od:

there are only 3 monomials in quotientlist, but nops return 6

Let a finite set of closed intervals in the plane be given.
How to find all the intersections of these, outputing the intersection points together with the intersecting intervals?
This is a problem of computational geometry
(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_segment_intersection).
In other words, how to realize the sweep line algorithm in Maple?

PS. I'd like to note that computational geometry has serious applications, in particular, in robotics.

Good afternoon.

I request your kind suggestion to my above cited query.

With thanks & Regards

M.Anand

Assistant Professor in Mathematics

SR International Institute of Technology,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

I want to solve system of equation but it has unknow parameter.

Then I test system of equation. It hasn't unknowparameter.

eq1 := x^2+y^2 = 4

eq2 := y-x^2 = 0

fsolve({eq1, eq2}, {x, y})

{x = -1.249621068, y = 1.561552813}

So I get answer by using fsolve.

Then I try to put unknow parameter in system of equation.

eq3 := x^2+ky^2 = 4

eq4 := ay-hx^2 = 0

fsolve({eq3, eq4}, {x, y})

Error, (in fsolve) {ay, hx, ky} are in the equation, and are not solved for

I don't get answer and open link. The link hasn't similar this problem.

To motivate some ideas in my research, I've been looking at the expected number of real roots of random polynomials (and their derivatives).  In doing so I have noticed an issue/bug with fsolve and RootFinding[Isolate].  One of the polynomials I came upon was

f(x) = -32829/50000-(9277/50000)*x-(37251/20000)*x^2-(6101/6250)*x^3-(47777/20000)*x^4+(291213/50000)*x^5.

We know that f(x) has at least 1 real root and, in fact, graphing shows that f(x) has exactly 1 real root (~1.018).  However, fsolve(f) and Isolate(f) both return no real roots.  On the other hand, Isolate(f,method=RC) correctly returns the root near 1.018.  I know that fsolve's details page says "It may not return all roots for exceptionally ill-conditioned polynomials", though this system does not seem especially ill-conditioned.  Moreover, Isolate's help page says confidently "All significant digits returned by the program are correct, and unlike purely numerical methods no roots are ever lost, although repeated roots are discarded" which is clearly not the case here.  It also seems interesting that the RealSolving package used by Isolate(f,method=RS) (default method) misses the root while the RegularChains package used by Isolate(f,method=RC) correctly finds the root.

 All-in-all, I am not sure what to make of this.  Is this an issue which has been fixed in more recent incarnations of fsolve or Isolate?  Is this a persistent problem?  Is there a theoretical reason why the root is being missed, particularly for Isolate?

Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.

How do I calculate run of 0s or run of 1s using maple?