I assume the goal is to have the Latex output close to the screen output in Maple. In these examples this is the case.

Example 1

restart;
A:=Matrix([[1,-1,0,2],[1,2,2,-2],[0,2,3,-1]]):
LinearAlgebra:-NullSpace(A)

But the Latex generated for the above, using the Latex() command is

\{ \left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\2 \\-1 \\1 \end{array}\right] \} 

Which when compiled

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\[
\{ \left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\2 \\-1 \\1 \end{array}\right] \} 
\]
\end{document}

gives

The latex should instead be 

\left\{ \left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\2 \\-1 \\1 \end{array}\right] \right\} 

Which compiles to

Example 2

restart;
A:=Matrix([[1,-1,0,2],[1,2,2,-2],[0,2,3,-1]]):
LinearAlgebra:-RowSpace(A)

The Latex of the above is 

[\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0 & 1 & 0 & -2 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \end{array}\right]]

Which when compiled gives

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\[
[\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0 & 1 & 0 & -2 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \end{array}\right]]
\]  
\end{document}

gives

A better Latex would be

\left[\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0 & 1 & 0 & -2 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \end{array}\right]\right]

Which compiles to

Now the size of the [[ is the same on both ends.

example 3

restart;
A:=Matrix([[1,-1,0,2],[1,2,2,-2],[0,2,3,-1]]):
LinearAlgebra:-ColumnSpace(A)

The Latex given for the above is

[\left[\begin{array}{c}1 \\0 \\0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\1 \\0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\0 \\1 \end{array}\right]]

Which when compiled

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\[
[\left[\begin{array}{c}1 \\0 \\0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\1 \\0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\0 \\1 \end{array}\right]]
\]  
\end{document}

gives

A better Latex is

\left[\left[\begin{array}{c}1 \\0 \\0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\1 \\0 \end{array}\right], 
\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\0 \\1 \end{array}\right]\right]

Which compiles to 

Maple 2020.2 with Physics  891 

I'm trying to just use "ThermophysicalData:-Chemical" function  to calculate below:

1 mol water vapor(H2O,g) condenses to liquid water  at 100C and 101.325kPa

Is there a function embeded to calculate DeltaW/H/S while switching the phases of matter.

thank you.

 

Here is the problem. I am trying to use sort() to make solution to ode show up with constant of integrations _C1 at the front of the term, instead of how Maple shows it, which is after the term, which does not look good.

As recommened in  Why-Maple-Refuses-To-Change-Location

sort() works well. Except for this: I am also using alias for the constant of integrations, to get nicer Latex output, as recommended in earlier post (which I can't find now). 

But once I use alias, now sort no longer produce the result I want. Here is an example

restart;
sol:=dsolve(diff(y(x),x) = x+y(x),y(x));
sort(sol)

Here sort works. It moved the term with constant of integration to the front, and _C1 at front, which is what I want as it looks more clear.

But when I do 

restart;
alias(seq(c[k]=_C||k,k=0..10)):
sol:=dsolve(diff(y(x),x) = x+y(x),y(x));
sort(sol)

This is because, I am assuming, the order of _C1 is higher than c[1] and sort is using the alias of _C1 to sort on and not _C1 itself.

The only reason I am using alias, is to get nicer Latex output when converting the solution to Latex vs. when using _C1

Is there a way to tell sort to treat c[1] as _C1, and c[2] as _C2, etc...  in terms of lexicographical ordering?

I see an order option for the command sort() in help, but so far did not know how to use it for the above purpose. This only affects _C1,_C2,_C3,_C4,.. and nothing else and I only use sort() on the output of the solution of ode. May be I need to write an order function and in there tell it c[1] has same order as _C1? But _C1 has c[1] as alias? so I do not think this will not work.

Basically I want to use the alias, but also use sort() on the result as if these constants of integrations where _C1,_C2, etc..

in my code, I set the alias at the global level, before I call any function in my package.

Any ideas how to do this or workaround this?

Maple 2020.2 on windows

 

An exercise of 1948 commits me to form the equation of conics passing by 3 points. Let P=0, Q=0, R=0 be the equations of the sides of the triangle ABC; if we associate these sides 2 to 2 we obtain 3 conics passing through points A, B, C having for equations QR=0, RP=0, PQ=0. As a result, the general equation of conics around the triangle ABC is: aQR+bRP+cPQ=0. P, Q, R being equations of the form mx+ny+pz=0 (so-called homogeneous coordinates). Then change to refined coordinates with x+y+z=1 (formula found on the internet and surely misinterpreted). Is it necessary to change of base ? Thank you for your help.

Given a metric, to compute quantities in the NP formalism one needs to specify a null tetrad. In the various examples in the help pages, sometimes the tetrad is specified simply as a list of 4 vectors, e.g., NT := [...] and sometimes evalDG is applied as in NT := evalDG({...]). Using the first format, Maple accepted NT as argument in NPSpinCoefficients but  NPCurvatureScalars(SpinCoefficients,NT) complained that the second argument wasn't a list of four vectors. When I used the second format, both commands returned the expected results. Why the difference?

RobinsonTrautmanSpinDG.mw

I am facing difficulty to realize this double iterative process. 

The equations in question are 

The flow chart for the iterative process is given as