MaplePrimes Questions

Hey there

I have noticed that after some time, Maple freezes and says in the bottom left corner that it is "evaluting" when I  copy something. This is becoming unbearable, as it makes every assignment take a lot longer. Why is this happening, and how can I prevent it?

Hi

I need your help with this problem. The date protocol here in the antipodes is day/month/year.

I get this error...Maybe there is an alternative.

does_not_evaluate.mw

 

Hi i want to perform double looping for different values of i and j as follows.. when i remove the summation sign it works, but no output obtained otherwise.

 

for j from 0 to 4, for i from 1 to 4 do u[i,1]:=-h*(∑)int(K2ij*gj(t),t=0..x)od;

 

Each K2ij and gj(t) have their own values defined above in the worksheet.

hello this is so simple, and so essentiel in mathprograms, but i cannot get it to work.

how do i run two list through a function that needs both variables.

i am gessing a "for loop" is the solution, but i dont really care if its a loop or not, just i am getting a solution to the problem.

the two list is of equal lengt.

example:

my variables

A:=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]:

B:=[10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100]:

my function

C:=A*E/4*pi*B

E is a konstant, in this case E=5

Need

so i want another list object. D to contain all the results from the calculation. as a list.

so D:=[]  needs to be filled with result.

for every run/calculation it takes, one of each of the variables F.ex.

C:=1*E/4*pi*10 and insert into the list D,

then C:=2*E/4*pi*20 and insert into the list D

then C:=3*E/4*pi*30 and insert into the list D.

and so on.

 

thx in advance

 

Can someone show me how to increase the font size in the button? 

I branched from here https://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/228527-Code-For-A-Clock-Within-Maple -- no auto links inserted. 

Lets say I would like to construct a procedure which 

a) Allowed to call the view option from plots:-display by a different name? Lets say zoom. 

So the argument would PlotGraph(x^2,zoom = [-5..5,-5..5]) 

Is that by any means theoretically possible ? 

PlotGraph := proc(func::anything, zoom := {(x::range := a .. b), (y::range := c .. d)}) plots:-display(plot(func), view = zoom); end proc;

PlotGraph(x^2 , zoom = [0 .. 1, -5 .. 5]);


Error, (in plots:-display) expecting option view to be of type {"default", list({"default", range(realcons)}), range(realcons)} but received zoom = [0 .. 1, -5 .. 5]

 

So question to forum what am I doing wrong? 
 

 

Hello, I have a question about converting an output of a expression into another.

solve({-1 < x, 0 < 2*x/(x^2 - 1), x < 1}, {x})

This is my expression which evaluates into: solve({-1 < x, 0 < 2*x/(x^2 - 1), x < 1}, {x}). Which is correct but I would like it to be a classic range, more precisely (-1,0).

Is there a command to do that?

Thanks,

David.

I am looking to solve the following ode numerically for different values of w, 

diff(y(x),x)^2=y(x)^(-3w-1), along with the intial condition y(1)=1. 

i have tried to solve this for w=-1/3 and w=0 but i am getting the error:

Error, (in DEtools/convertsys) unable to convert to an explicit first-order system

I believe it probably has something to do with the fact that the first derivative is squared but i dont know how to procede with fixing that. 

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

I  can't seem to get a solution to the following problem.  Can anyone see where I am going wrong I thought I had correct IBC s but they may be wrong/ill-posed

Melvin
 

Two 1-D coupled Burgers equations - semiclassical case: remove O( `&hbar;`^2) terms for u(x,t) but retain O( `&hbar;`) terms for v(x,t):

In the quantum case, there are two coupled quantum Burgers equations, which each include the quantum potential terms.  As in the classical case above, we apply constant external forces Fuand Fv.  Our aim is to display the profiles of u(x, t) and v(x, t) as strings on x, t space.

#hBar := 'hBar': m := 'm':Fu := 'Fu': Fv := 'Fv': # define constants

hBar := 1:m := 1:Fu := 0.2:Fv := 0.1: # set constant values - same as above ...consider reducing

At O( `&hbar;`^2) the real quantum potential term is zero, leaving the classical expression:

pdeu := diff(u(x,t),t)+u(x,t)/m*(diff(u(x,t),x)) = Fu;

diff(u(x, t), t)+u(x, t)*(diff(u(x, t), x)) = .2

(1)

On the otherhand, the imaginary quantum potential equation for v(x,t) has only O( `&hbar;`) terms and so is retained as semiclassical

pdev := diff(v(x,t),t)+u(x,t)/m*(diff(v(x,t),x))-hBar*(diff(u(x,t),x$2))/(2*m)+v(x,t)*(diff(u(x,t),x))/m = Fv;

diff(v(x, t), t)+u(x, t)*(diff(v(x, t), x))-(1/2)*(diff(diff(u(x, t), x), x))+v(x, t)*(diff(u(x, t), x)) = .1

(2)

By inspection of the derivatives in above equations we now set up the ICs and BCs for u(x, t) and "v(x,t)."

The quantum initial and boundary conditions are similar to the classical case, but also comprise additional boundary condition terms for v and for u, notably a 1st derivative BC term for u.

IBCu := {u(x,0) = 0.1*sin(2*Pi*x),u(0,t) = 0.5-0.5*cos(2*Pi*t),D[1](u)(0,t) = 2*Pi*0.1*cos(2*Pi*t)};# IBC for u

{u(0, t) = .5-.5*cos(2*Pi*t), u(x, 0) = .1*sin(2*Pi*x), (D[1](u))(0, t) = .6283185308*cos(2*Pi*t)}

(3)

IBCv := {v(x,0) = 0.2*sin((1/2)*Pi*x),v(0,t)=0.2-0.2*cos(2*Pi*t)};# IBC for v

{v(0, t) = .2-.2*cos(2*Pi*t), v(x, 0) = .2*sin((1/2)*Pi*x)}

(4)

IBC := IBCu union IBCv;

{u(0, t) = .5-.5*cos(2*Pi*t), u(x, 0) = .1*sin(2*Pi*x), v(0, t) = .2-.2*cos(2*Pi*t), v(x, 0) = .2*sin((1/2)*Pi*x), (D[1](u))(0, t) = .6283185308*cos(2*Pi*t)}

(5)

pds:=pdsolve({pdeu,pdev},IBC, time = t, range = 0..0.2,numeric);# 'numeric' solution

_m2606922675232

(6)

The following quantum animation is in contrast with the classical case, and illustrates the delocalisation of the wave form caused by the quantum diffusion and advection terms:

T:=2; p1:=pds:-animate({[u, color = green, linestyle = dash], [v, color = red, linestyle = dash]},t = 0..T, gridlines = true, numpoints = 2000,x = 0..0.2):p1;

2

 

Error, (in pdsolve/numeric/animate) unable to compute solution for t>HFloat(0.0):
matrix is singular

 

p1

(7)

Note that this plot also shows that there are regions in which pIm < 0,  pRe > 0.  Below, the 3D plot of u(x,t),v(x,t) also illustrates the quantum delocalisation of features:

T := 3; p1 := pds:-plot3d({[u, shading = zhue], [v, color = red]}, t = 0 .. T, x = -0.1e-2 .. 2,transparency = 0.0, orientation = [-146, 54, 0], title = print("Coupled quantum solution \n u(x, t) zhue, v(x,t) red", numeric),scaling=unconstrained):p1;

3

 

"Coupled quantum solution 
 u(x, t) zhue, v(x,t) red", numeric

 

Error, (in pdsolve/numeric/plot3d) unable to compute solution for t>HFloat(0.0):
matrix is singular

 

``


 

Download BurgersEqns.mw

Here it is:

#hBar := 'hBar': m := 'm':Fu := 'Fu': Fv := 'Fv': # define constants
hBar := 1:m := 1:Fu := 0.2:Fv := 0.1: # set constant values - same as above ...consider reducing
At O( 
`&hbar;`^2;
) the real quantum potential term is zero, leaving the classical expression:
pdeu := diff(u(x,t),t)+u(x,t)/m*(diff(u(x,t),x)) = Fu;
              / d         \           / d         \      
      pdeu := |--- u(x, t)| + u(x, t) |--- u(x, t)| = 0.2
              \ dt        /           \ dx        /      
On the otherhand, the imaginary quantum potential equation for v(x,t) has only O( 
`&hbar;`;
) terms and so is retained as semiclassical
pdev := diff(v(x,t),t)+u(x,t)/m*(diff(v(x,t),x))-hBar*(diff(u(x,t),x$2))/(2*m)+v(x,t)*(diff(u(x,t),x))/m = Fv;
                                                     2         
         / d         \           / d         \   1  d          
 pdev := |--- v(x, t)| + u(x, t) |--- v(x, t)| - - ---- u(x, t)
         \ dt        /           \ dx        /   2    2        
                                                    dx         

              / d         \      
    + v(x, t) |--- u(x, t)| = 0.1
              \ dx        /      
By inspection of the derivatives in above equations we now set up the ICs and BCs for 
u(x, t);
 and 
v(x,t).;
The quantum initial and boundary conditions are similar to the classical case, but also comprise additional boundary condition terms for 
v;
 and for 
u;
, notably a 1st derivative BC term for 
u;
.
IBCu := {u(x,0) = 0.1*sin(2*Pi*x),u(0,t) = 0.5-0.5*cos(2*Pi*t),D[1](u)(0,t) = 2*Pi*0.1*cos(2*Pi*t)};# IBC for u
          IBCu := {u(0, t) = 0.5 - 0.5 cos(2 Pi t), 

            u(x, 0) = 0.1 sin(2 Pi x), 

            D[1](u)(0, t) = 0.6283185308 cos(2 Pi t)}
IBCv := {v(x,0) = 0.2*sin((1/2)*Pi*x),v(0,t)=0.2-0.2*cos(2*Pi*t)};# IBC for v
                   /                                 
          IBCv := { v(0, t) = 0.2 - 0.2 cos(2 Pi t), 
                   \                                 

                             /1     \\ 
            v(x, 0) = 0.2 sin|- Pi x| }
                             \2     // 
IBC := IBCu union IBCv;
         /                                 
 IBC := { u(0, t) = 0.5 - 0.5 cos(2 Pi t), 
         \                                 

   u(x, 0) = 0.1 sin(2 Pi x), v(0, t) = 0.2 - 0.2 cos(2 Pi t), 

                    /1     \  
   v(x, 0) = 0.2 sin|- Pi x|, 
                    \2     /  

                                           \ 
   D[1](u)(0, t) = 0.6283185308 cos(2 Pi t) }
                                           / 
pds:=pdsolve({pdeu,pdev},IBC, time = t, range = 0..0.2,numeric);# 'numeric' solution
                     pds := _m2606922675232
The following quantum animation is in contrast with the classical case, and illustrates the delocalisation of the wave form caused by the quantum diffusion and advection terms:
T:=2; p1:=pds:-animate({[u, color = green, linestyle = dash], [v, color = red, linestyle = dash]},t = 0..T, gridlines = true, numpoints = 2000,x = 0..0.2):p1;
                             T := 2
Error, (in pdsolve/numeric/animate) unable to compute solution for t>HFloat(0.0):
matrix is singular
                               p1
 

The help page for dsolve,numeric,events says that "A call to a procedure-form dsolve numeric procedure" can return the time that one or more events fired by coding the eventfire option.

I do not know how to code for this.

Please provide a simple example of a procedure-form dsolve numeric with an event that exhibits this feature.

 

sys.pdf

Can  anyone help me to proof that this solution is the right solution to this system ?

Good day to you all.

I would like to construct a plot of several data sources and would like to understand how I can animate each event.

For instance - consider a plot of 2 data sets (a simple example is in the attached worksheet), one as a point and another as a column. What is the most efficient way to construct this? Following that, how can both data sets be animated in synch?

Thanks for reading!

MaplePrimes_Example.mw

Hi everyone:

I'm going to write code to give me the following expression, how can I do it?
n is Natural and k=0..n. 

Just want labels but no axes. Also seems with axes=none sometimes I get wierd artifacts in the surfacewireframe where the wireframe is some wierd color. If I set the axes to normal it goes away and then usually it is ok. Sometimes half the graph is colored this way. It is with MatrixPlot.

How does one set the size of a 3D plot? I get tired of dragging it's size when it resets it to the default size. size=[w,h] does not work with plot3d.

 

First 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 Last Page 609 of 2427