Seems simple enough but I can't find how to select the whole part of a decimal number.  I want to use the number with mod. 

I'm not sure if this can be done in a current worksheet but I'm pretty sure it has to be done in a separate worksheet. 

What I'm trying to do is set up a running loop that automatically displays the amount of time the maple kernel has been in use, say every 600 seconds or so.  I know I need to use time[real] but I need it continuously running if I want it to display times, right?  Which means I need it to run in a separate worksheet I think. 

Any ways that I can do this with maple?

Hello have a text file full of x,y,and z Coordinates. Im trying to create a Topographical Map using these coordinates. How can I use Maple to plot these points and show me the contours. Prefereably I would like to have a 3D model of what im ploting

Thanks for any help or advice

I have asked this question in a math forum on the physics forum site and figured it would fit better here:

http://physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2288111#post2288111

any and all help would be greatly appreciated!

MT

can any one help how to plot streamlines for any given velocity vector field. or any one know strean proc please.

I have given a hypercube in dimension d > 3 (in the form (min,max) for each coordinate) and I want to get all integral points in (LaTeX-Pseudo-Code):

Z^d  \cap hypercube

ie. I want to compute all integral coordinates which are in the given boundaries. In d=3 this is easily done by three for-loops. But how in general dimension?

Hi, I have plotted an implicit 3d plot of an extensive equation into maple, but the particular equation represents a treshold, as it is calculated as the difference between two equations. Which means that everything below the graph represents the case were equation one is bigger than equation two and everything above the graph the opposite. Now by changing the parameters held constant before, I would like to make clear what happens to the chance that one equation is bigger than the other. So to come to the point, is it possible to calculate the surface below and above a certain graph?

Hello,

I am trying to work with nested procedures, and I am getting weird results.  Maybe I am going crazy, or I am doing something wrong, or this is just a bug.

I've reduced the problem to this:

I'm having trouble entering text in maple 10.  I enter a sentence, then go to enter a formula and get an error message. I just want to use maple to enter formulas with explanation.  Is there a article on how to do this?

Just curious as to what things mathematica is better at than maple?  In other words what does mathematica have that maple doesn't?  Are they better at graphic visualization?

I frequently end up with large equations with many repeated sub-expressions.  These equations could be made infinitely more readable if this one expression were broken up into several expressions to calculate the sub-expressinos and store them in auxiliary variables.  This is not just good for readability...it is also useful when it comes time to move the results into a programming implementation (Maple is just a playground).

i want learn programming with maple

would you help me with lecture notes 

thanks