I have a worksheet saved, but if I try to continue where I left off, Maple has forgotten what all the variables mean and what their values were. 

It's not like I have to retype everything - the commands are still there - but I have to press enter about a hundred times to reenforce what the meanings of all the variables were. 

Is there a way to save it in such a way that you don't lose such information?

This is what I ve to solve...It's simple!And it works, but if I write:

>fsolve({2*x + y = 1, x - y  = 2}, {x, y});

I must say I am pretty dissapointed by the fact that TA4 still has a lot of very basic, obvious bugs and suboptimalities which I would have thought were clearly apparent in TA 3 and could surely have been corrected.   For example:

(1) $a=0;  $b=$a;     sets $b = -0

(2) $c=frac(-2,-1)     sets $c = --2

Hi,

I have the following (simplified here) formula:

G = ∫∫ g dp (n * dr)

The last part "(n*dr) is actually a dotproduct. How do I put this in Maple? Usually you use something like "G:=Int(Int(g dp (n), p=0..1), r=0..1) but than I don't have a dotproduct between "n" and "dr".

Tim

How do I build a cobweb plot of a recursion equation in Maple?

for example,if we have a table T=table([aa=2, bb=3 cc=4, dd=5]),how can we get another table(2=aa,3=bb,4=cc,5=dd) ?

another question:
if we have table([aa=3,bb=5,cc=1,dd=3]),how can we output indices according to entries' ascending order?

thank you

i would like to know any of you guys have any ideas on forecasting economy. basically using different equations and its command in Maple?

Is there a way to convert a complex expression into the form a + ib (splitting it into its Re and Im parts) , even if the expression that you want to convert is in terms of a variable?

ie, I have something like f(r) and I want to put it in the form a(r) + i b(r)

How do I set maple to work with this units kN (kilo newtons), MN (mega Newtons 1MN= 10^6 N)??'  I'm Just starting with maple. Thanks for your help!

Hi All,

Would anybody be able to explain to me how to find the steady state temperature distribution in maple using the finite difference method?

Any help wouild be greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Joel

Hi

I am getting the following error in Matlab for an equation that I converted from Maple using the Matlab() command.

"Subscript indices must either be real positive integers or logicals."

Maple does show this warning before giving the Matlab code.

"Warning, the function names {alphaD} are not recognized in the target language"

The equation is the derivative of a function with more than one variable.

Please help to sort this out.

Thanks

Hi,

I have some data (points of results -> a list of x - data and a list of corresponding y - data) and I would like to fit a curve to this data.  curves does not fit very well to the data points.

Can anybody give me a method to fit a curve to the data?

Tanks!

The data are:

I get "hypergeom" with Thomas Calculus exercise 5.6.15 for some unknown reason. the other exercises don't get this. See it at:

http://i36.tinypic.com/258lzqx.jpg

how can i get rid of the "hypergeom" in the answer ?

Hello!

I have just found this incorrect behaviour of is  (Maple 12):

restart;

Hi all,

> deq := diff(x(t), t) = 3*x(t)/t+(9/2)*t-13;

                             d         3 x(t)   9       
                     deq := --- x(t) = ------ + - t - 13
                             dt          t      2       
> ci := x(3) = 6;

                               ci := x(3) = 6
> p := dsolve({ci, deq}, x(t), numeric);

                        p := proc(x_rkf45)  ...  end;
> plots[odeplot](p, view = [-1 .. 4, -10 .. 10]);

> p(0);

                  [                                     -8]
                  [t = 0., x(t) = 8.65023735199754930 10  ]

but if I do:

> q := dsolve({ci, deq}, x(t), type = numeric, method = taylorseries);

                    q := proc(x_taylorseries)  ...  end;
> plots[odeplot](q, view = [-1 .. 4, -10 .. 10]);


> q(0);

                             [t = 0., x(t) = 0.]
> solex := rhs(dsolve({ci, deq}, x(t)));

                                    9  2   13      3
                         solex := - - t  + -- t + t 
                                    2      2        

But in cases where I don't know the answer, which should I trust?  here is another one

> deq := diff(x(t), t) = 1-t-x(t)/t;

                               d                 x(t)
                       deq := --- x(t) = 1 - t - ----
                               dt                 t  
> ci := x(1) = 0;

                               ci := x(1) = 0
> q := dsolve({ci, deq}, x(t), numeric);

                        q := proc(x_rkf45)  ...  end;
> q(0);

                    [t = 0., x(t) = 1.73003351210698475]
> plots[odeplot](q);


> solex := rhs(dsolve({ci, deq}, x(t)));

                                    1  2   1      1 
                         solex := - - t  + - t - ---
                                    3      2     6 t
> plot(solex, t = -1 .. 1, -100 .. 100);


and for the finish

> r := dsolve({ci, deq}, x(t), numeric, method = taylorseries);

                    r := proc(x_taylorseries)  ...  end;
> plots[odeplot](r);
%;
Warning, could not obtain numerical solution at all points, plot may be incomplete

> r(0);

Error, (in r) cannot continue integration past t=0.585794295977905e-4, step size dropped below minimum

Thanks in advance for any help

Mario