I start with a question, but not an how-to question, because I am puzzled by why such a routine is missing.

Why does Maple not have  generalized Schur (real and complex) factorizations with reordering?  The nice solution of many dynamic equations requires this factorization because the lhs is singular. MatLab does have such a routine. At the moment, it seems, one has to have accessible and connect to MatLab or NAG or LAPACK for such routines.

Is this...

Is there a way to select multiple entries in a ListBox component? 

Using the following script with cmaple I got a plot with three legend elements. (see img link). 

How can I remove Curve 3 and Curve 5 entries?

with(plots):
plotsetup(gif,plotoutput=`test_maple.gif`,plotoptions=`color,noborder,portrait`):

l:=10^(-3);
Vel:=(y,t)->sum(n*y*t, n = 0 .. 10);

Vel1 := plot(...

I am trying to learn how to use Maple by working simple-minded projective geometry problems. I want to define a line in terms of two points, one of which is an intersection of two other lines. Must I define the intersection before using it as an argument, or is there a way to refer to the intersection without bothering to name it, as one might do in OOP by creating an anonymous object to use as an argument of the intersection procedure?

I, too, ran into this flaw...

I multiplied 1kohm*5microF, and was surprised to find:

1. I must use mF rather than Greek microF for the capacitance. I am a novice, though, so I may have missed something.

2. The result expanded units to something ugly using [[kOmega]]. I am surprised that at this late hour in Maple development that we still see [[]] for units AND units are not automatically simplified in the unit base that we are using.

3. The examples above are clear enough, but still amount to r-clicking and selecting Units>Simplify. Typing the command doesn't remove the burden of simplifying.

4. Maple correctly suggested units of seconds for my example, so it apparently knew what to do. So where is the global option to automatically simplify units, and why are we still using [[]], and why are microFarads mF, even in light of ASCII-based history?

I looked in Help and did a web search for answers, but came up empty...

I want to show algebraically that the expected correlation is
decreasing in the tails of the distribution ie that the correlation coefficient
breaksdown when we have large moves. How can this be done?

Here is a standard example of how dcoeffs works:

> with(PDEtools);
> X := a*(diff(y(x), x, x))^2+b*(diff(y(x), x, x))+c*(diff(y(x), x));
                             2                     ...

for example:

i want to know how many numbers generated in this loops

[seq([seq(i, j = i .. 5)], i = 1 .. 5)]

[1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [2, 2, 2, 2], [3, 3, 3], [4, 4], [5];

as if there is no way that can make a "++" increment operator in maple 12

please give me advise how can i find some text fragment in Math 2D mode?

Hi,

    I'm trying to get a component to perform a Fractional Derivative in MapleSim to use in a multibody simulation (as a spring-dash pot component). However, I'm stumped by trying to get the fracdiff function past the custom component code.

• When set to series, the fractional derivative is only accurate near the estimated about point
• When set to LaPlace, it's impossible to perform the transform...

Good morning. I know what is the function that I report the rank of the controllability matrix for time-invariant systems.?

help me please

I have a very simply equations 

eqs := {2.32 = a+b, pa = .4310344828*a, pb = .4310344828*b, pa+pb = 1}

pa is the persnet of a in the whole a+b

maple auto simplify pa = a / 2.32 to that.

I call the solve(eqs) and get the NULL return. that mean there is no solution for this eqs

but that's not true

even I do this

solve(eqs union {a=1})

it also return NULL

My command:

odeplot(dsol1,[x(t), y(t), z(t)])

where dsol1 is the numeric RK45 solution of my system of differential equations, and x(t), y(t), z(t) are the solutions. This command works fine, but I am not able to animate it.  

hi guys,

i need to solve s system pf three PDES numerically and ended up with "in pdsolve/numeric/process_PDEs) all dependent variables in PDE must have dependencies esplicitly delclared". Can anyone gives me a hint to fix it (worksheet is attached).

Thanks

=

I have to make following substitutions in a ODE:

alpha = x - 2

y(alpha) =  y(x) - 1

[Maple code starts]

The ode is 

ODE := diff(y(x), x) = (y(x)+1)/(x+2)-exp((y(x)+1)/(x+2));

I have used the following commands:

Rhsa := eval(rhs(ODE), {x = alpha-2, y(x) = y(alpha)-1});
lhsa:=subs({x = alpha, y(x) = y(alpha)}, lhs(ODE));

Sub_ODE:=lhsa = Rhsa;