lcz

1029 Reputation

11 Badges

5 years, 285 days
changsha, China

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by lcz

@Carl Love Thank you!Now I get it.

@Kitonum Thank you!  I do not understand what the mechanism  of index in sum is.

@Kitonum  Thank you !

But When I use your second codes

restart;
P := plot(sin(x)-x+(x^3)/3!, x=-2*Pi..2*Pi) :
L := plots[textplot]( [ 3 , 17 , sin(x)-x+(x^3)/`3`!],  axes = none) :
plots[display](P ,L, axes = normal)

 I found there is a difference between font of 3 in the denominator of x^3/3! and other symbol's

 

@nm 

indeed,Table[] is like seq() in Maple, I mean the following code in mathematica

ls[[1 ;; -1 ;; 2]]
ls[[2 ;; -1 ;; 2]]

 

I thought there was something similar that could be done in Maple.

@nm 

 

At the beginning I thought there would be a simple and fast function. Just like mathematica. 

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4813111/how-to-get-the-oddly-indexed-elements-in-a-list-in-mathematica

expr .. expr  is not flexible  for me . For example:

ls[ .. 2]

 

Maybe if it can be set like this, it will be better.

ls(1..2..-1)

In fact

@mmcdara I'm very sorry, I didn't pay attention to the information before! 

Thank you for your great  work and explanation

This program is very good!

@Carl Love  

Thank you so much, I was negligent and didn't pay attention to observation that  each b_i  is  free unknown variable

@vv  Fortunately, I found an alternative.  Some people did a lot of work

http://crossings.uos.de/ 

@vv Indeed. I might be asking more broadly. 

I once asked such a question about crossing number of graph :

https://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/228584--Someone-Can-Help-Me--To-Compute-Crossing

This can be found in SageMath, but it is very slow. Of course, it was expected.

My goal is to test whether a given graph is 1-planar. Of course, it is difficult! We tend to consider the combination method. But we can try draw different drawing  before we prove it. This may involve different isomorphism drawing of graph.

 

 

@acer  Thanks, This is good enough.

@Carl Love Thanks for the advice. Your suggestion is valid for dealing with parallel edges. But I still can't handle it effectively.

I used FindEulerianCycle in mathematica  indirectly by G-e7+{13}.

  g = Graph[{1 <-> 2, 1 <-> 3, 1 <-> 4, 3 <-> 4, 3 <-> 4, 2 <-> 4, 
   1 <-> 3}, VertexLabels -> Automatic]
 

FindEulerianCycle[g, All]

We found 16 Eulerian trails. That's all we want. I don't know how to do in Maple. 

 There is no  function like  FindEulerianCycle[g, All]

@vv Thanks ,Good ideas!

@nm  Thanks But Why use A^+? A may be enough.

 

 

 

@Kitonum  Extremely grateful! One more question I care about.

how do I estimate errors  in maple if I use Optimization:-Maximize  .   does maple have any tools to analyze?

@Carl Love  Thanks I learn another good trick from you.

First 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Page 12 of 16