@acer 

Thank you acer for your fruitful answer.
My “application” has two components :

• first is a graphical maplet-based  interface made of about 50 procedures (not all contain maplets) ; all the stuff is contained in a single worksheet with 52 sections : one per procedure ; one for the module definition  (in which  use 50 commands such as proc1 := eval(:-proc1) in the export directive) and the last one for creating the mla.
• Second is the “computational code” itself, made of a “main” worksheet, plus a lots of modules written as the previous one.

From your answer I realize that the way I used to build the code is not at all adapted for code versioning, for I have to split all my modules in individual text files.
(I guess the .mv to .mpl translation has to be done manualy from the “export as” menu ?).
Of course it will take some time but nothing complicated.

I’m not familiar with the $include directive in modules (not am I with $define) : I need to take a look in these.


By the way, on your answer, does it means that you make the developments directly in a text file, or that you do them in a  worksheet and then export it as a text file ?

Thanks again,  all that remains for me to do is to roll up my sleeves

PS : I intend to us GIT to do the versioning : does it exist a plugin to do syntactic colouring ? (for example tomments in one color, MAPLE keywords in another ...)

@ThU 

from Google with keywords "eclipse plugin maple" I came upon http://fr.maplesoft.com/products/toolboxes/IDE/index.aspx

and found this info

       Looking for Maple IDE?
       Maplesoft is no longer acting as a reseller for this product from DigiArea Inc.
       Maple includes many features to support application development, including a Code Editor. Learn more

that made me think to Maple IDE as an abandoned product  (Eclipse claims the plugin is no longer operational since 2012)

I'll be taken a look on the site you give,

Thanks for the answer

@acer ... it works perfectly well, thanks.

PS : I had misunderstood "interface(displayprecision=5)" which acts (as its name indicates), on the display alone, with evalf[5](...) which truly modifies the evaluation itself

@Kitonum 

It is really diffficult to rank the many solutions provided here, but yours is brilliant while being more versatile

The Sylvester's criterion is often use to check if square real valued matrix can be a variance matrix : as I am concerned with this issue your procedure will be of great help here too.

Thanks for all the work you did

@acer 
You write "FWIW"  ...
In french  "For What It's Worth" has some kind of negative significance, something like "I give you this information but it's not worth much, just look if you can find any interest in it".
Maybe its english significance is subtly different ?
For, personally, I find it very instructive (so from "french acceptation" this information matters), specially the one contained in the first grey rectangle : thinking to split the problem (more generally a problem) is an idea that could be useful in other situations.


Thanks acer
 

@John May 
I had used the command solve this way
solve(r^2-r*s+s^2 = 0, r)
and next checked if the solutions were complex (wich gave just a part of the answer) ... but it looked far too articifial

The way you handle the issue is undoubtedly more clever than mine.

Great thanks

@vv  it's all clear to me now.

You wrote :  is(I, positive)  is of course false (not being real) ... I now understand why

Thanks a lot

@vv  I have just done those few elementary tests : all if them return the correct "true" answer

restart;

assume(r, positive):

assume(s, positive):           

is(r^2+s^2, positive);                                  

is(r^2+s^2 > 0);                   

restart:                               

is(r^2+s^2 > 0) assuming r > 0, s > 0;                   

is(r^2+s^2 > 0) assuming positive                      

@vv ...  unfortunately disappointing answer (Maple handles only relatively simple conditions when dealing with several variables)

Point [1]
Strangely I did not obtained a FAIL answer by using
is( r^2 - r*s + s^2> 0) assuming r >0, s>0;

or
assume(r>0): #or assume(r, positive)
assume(s>0): #or assume(s, positive)
is( r^2 - r*s + s^2> 0) ;

but always "false"

Note : even writing r^2 - r*s + s^2  in the following form   1/2*(r - s)^2 + (1/2)*(r^2  + s^2 ) has the same result (which suggests checking r^2+s^2 will also fail (?)).


Point [2]
I guess you refer to my auxiliary message  ?
            is(I, 'complex')                          # obviously true
            is(I, 'positive')                          # returns false
I know the set of real numbers is contained in the set of real numbers and, as a rule Maple operates over the latter , but how can Maple decide if a pure imaginary number is positive ? Or some complex number ?

Finally I did know the way you use assuming in the commang
is( r^2 - r*s + s^2> 0) assuming positive;
What are the inderterminates "assuming positive" refers to ?

Thanks again for the time spent

assume(r, 'positive')
is(r, 'complex')                 # returns  true, just as coulditbe does too
                                        # Is this suggest that being 'positive' is consistent with being complex ?

Now let's try this
is(I, 'complex')                          # obviously true
is(I, 'positive')                           # returns false

then an object of complex type is not positive (at first hand I would have thought Maple will return FAIL ???)
 

@Markiyan Hirnyk I will remember that

@Kitonum ... I should have find this by myself !

Nevertheless thank vou for reminding me my dumbness :-)

@tomleslie  ... and I'm aware of that.
While maybe too radical, your suggestion  remains interesting.

Thanks

@John May  Nice way to proceed.

@tomleslie  Even if not complete I do appreciate your contribution