I had same craches with Maple 2025 but it still persists with the latest Maple releases.

I have tried to reinstall the redistributable

but get error messages

(Should I install x86 instead?)

Could it be that the installation (of Maple and the redistributable) only works when logged in as an administrator instead of installing an update as administrator (beeing logged-in as standard user)?

Can someone confirm that inserting a hyperlink crashes Maple 2026 on Windows (11)?

Has anybody a workaround to link to a locally saved worksheet?

In 2-D Math input:
In a product of more than two factors space is not allways sufficient to delimite factors when one of the factors is of type numeric.

Just for my interest: Is there a reason or a rule for that?

Download Missing_operation.mw

Consider these two output, both for solving system of 2 first order different equations.

Why is the first result is put in a list, then each solution is in a set inside the list, while the second one is just a set of the two solutions?

My guess is that because the first system is non-linear.  Is this why?

This makes it little harder to parse the result later on, as it can change each time. 

Is there a way to get same output for the first example as in the second example?

Mapkle 2026.1

ode:=diff(x(t),t) = x(t)^2, diff(y(t),t) = exp(t);
sol:=dsolve([ode],[x(t),y(t)])

ode:=diff(x(t),t) = x(t), diff(y(t),t) = t;
sol:=dsolve([ode],[x(t),y(t)])

ps. the ode's are not even coupled in these example. So each can be solved on its own if needed.

And if there is one ode with multiple solutions, now dsolve returns expression sequence. No set, no list.

ode:=2*x*diff(y(x),x)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x) = -1+diff(y(x),x)^2; 
dsolve(ode,y(x));

This whole thing is a mess. 

There should be one consistent way to return solutions for all cases. 

Regadless if it is one ode with one solution, or one ode with mutliple solutions, or coupled systems of odes, linear or not and so on.

The output should be the same form in all cases. A list of lists or list of sets or whatever it is decided on.

But it should not change.

I was trying to use the debugger into a proc that has this call

P:=plots:-contourplot(RHS,':-colorbar' = false,':-contours' = L):

Even though the proc has : at its end, and the above call to plots also ends with :, the debugger insists in printing to the debugger window the contour cuves lines. i.e the value of P

Is there a way to tell the debugger not to do this? i.e. not show the value of P. It seems it does that automatically.

Here is the worksheet. Simply evaluate the call foo(); this will open a debugger windows. Then click on next button and now debugger will print  the output of plots:-contourplot(RHS,':-colorbar' = false,':-contours' = L): 

Download hang_maple_2026_1_on_timelimit.mw

Here is screen shot

In my main actual code, the output was so large that it hanged Maple UI when stepping into the debugger and hitting that line.  I had to kill Maple from task manager as Java UI got stuck due to large output.

Why is it showing value of P when I have : at the end? Is there an option to turn automatic display of variables in debugger as one steps in?

given

ode:=2*x^(1/2)*diff(y(x),x)-y(x) = -sin(x^(1/2))-cos(x^(1/2)); 
ic:=y(infinity) = y__0; 
sol:=dsolve([ode,ic]);

It gives  

This solution satisfies the ode itself. Now cos(sqrt(x)) when x=infinity is  -1..+1

But IC says y(infinity)=y0  so odetest do not verify the IC and gives this

odetest(sol,[ode,ic]);

I think dsolve should not have returned a solution at all. 

What do the experts here think of this result?

Maple 2026.1 on windows 10

I am new to evala (and the math behind).

On ?evala,Sqrfree at the first bullet point I was wondering if there isn't a "u" missing here

Can someone confirm?

WHen I open many worksheets at same time, say 10. The new UI do not stack them all (i.e. the tab at the top), forcing one to use the small arrow to navigate to each worksheet.

Is there a way to tell the UI to show all tabs (may be double rows and 3 rows as needed) to make it easier to jump from one worksheet to the other?

I do not know if this is new feature in the new ribbon UI or not. 

Here is screen show where I have 10 worksheets open

There is also a pull down menu, but it only shows 8 worksheets and one can have more open but they do not show. So have to scroll down looking for the rest. Even that does not work well. many times when I try to scroll down, the window closes. It will not give me time to move the mouse to the scroll bar to move it before it closes.

Both of these solutions are not good. Having to use the arrow key to look and navigate for a different worksheet is bad UI design.

How to see all tabs for all open worksheet in same UI?  If the tabs do not fit on one row, why not make second row? If two rows do not fit, make 3rd row. This should be an option for the user. But I did not see one so far. But will keep looking.

I find tabs where all worksheet show much better design that this UI design.   

I only use worksheet and not document mode. Windows 10.

To give you idea what I mean, These are examples found on the net of stacked tabs

Where in Maple, each tab above will have the name of the worksheet open. Font can be small, is OK.

Is it possible to have this in the new UI for open worksheets?

One option I might try to make my worksheets names much shorter. May be then they will fit all in same window.

Dear all,

I'm reporting what seems to me as a bug in the SMTLIB library in maple. 

    |\^/|     Maple 2026 (X86 64 LINUX)
._|\|   |/|_. Copyright (c) Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple Inc. 2026
 \  MAPLE  /  All rights reserved. Maple is a trademark of
 <____ ____>  Waterloo Maple Inc.
      |       Type ? for help.
> SMTLIB:-Satisfiable({x^2=2,y^2=2,x<y});
                                     true

> SMTLIB:-Satisfiable({x^2=2,y^2=2,y<x});
                                     false

> SMTLIB:-Satisfiable({x^2=2,a^2=2,a<x});
                                     true

The Satisfiable command do not output the correct decision on two formulas of equivalent realization by switching x<y (output SAT) to y<x (output UNSAT). I suspect this is because some alphabetical order depandance in the variables as for a<y we get SAT again.

I tried to feed Z3 with the code given by ToString on the problematic formula and I get two different outputs :

• on the Z3 version 4.8.12 from the ubuntu repository (apt install) I also get the wrong UNSAT output;
• one the Z3 version 4.17.0 build from the official github repository I finally get the correct SAT output.

Thus, I suspect a version problem in SMTLIB that do not take in account the last updates made in SMT solvers (Z3?).

Many thanks for considering my problem!

I asked Maple AI what a glyph is. Then I prompted this

A kernel lost message was returned and the AI pannel became irresponsive.

Maple is still running well in exsisting and new tabs. 

Can the AI service be restarted from the user interface?

(Is that crash reproducible?)

Edit:

05-2-2.mws

Can you help me with this code?

Download 05-2-2.mws

Can anyone share additional information about the Maple conference to be held in 2026? I want to submit a talk and then submit a paper to the Maple Transactions journal based on the same.

Para_1.mw.  please help to correct this error.

It seems that in Maple 2025+ on Windows 11, the SMTLIB package is not working. For example:

SMTLIB:-Satisfiable( {x^2+y^2+z^2<1, x*y*z>1} ) assuming real;

complains about error loading external library mplsmtlib.dll.

Is there an explanation, or a workaround?

Hi,

I need to run the following procedure a couple of million times. Although it works, Maple sometimes chokes for no apparent reason (if there is a reason, please let me know). I was wondering whether an expert could help me tweak the procedure (or possibly rewrite it) to achieve the best possible performance. I am planning to use Grid:-Map or, if possible, Threads:-Map.

generateNonlinearModelsPlus := proc(model::list,fullmodel::list,vars::list:=[x,y,z])
description "This function generates a list of all models with one more monomial from the full model":
local tab::table(),n:=nops(model),i,j,k:=1,ans,terms,aaa,allmoncoefThreads:
# local procedure
allmoncoefThreads := proc(f::list,vars::list)
description "This function finds the monomials multipled by their coefficients for each expression (equation) of a list.":
local n:=numelems(f),i,mon:=[seq](0,i=1..n),M,cc:=[seq](0,i=1..n),ans:
for i from 1 to n do
  cc[i]:=[coeffs](expand(f[i]),vars, 'M'):
  mon[i]:=[M]:
end do:
ans:=[seq](zip((ww,vv)->ww*vv,cc[i],mon[i]),i=1..n):
return(ans)
end proc:
# main part
ans:=zip((w,v)->expand(simplify(v-w)),model,fullmodel): # Find the monomials that are not in model
terms:=allmoncoefThreads(ans,vars): # Separate the monomials
#
for i from 1 to n do
   aaa:=model:
   for j from 1 to nops(terms[i]) do
       aaa[i]:=model[i]+terms[i,j]:
       tab[k]:=aaa:
       k:=k+1:
   end do:
end do:
tab:=convert(tab,list):
return(tab):
end proc:

Here is an example of how I run it: 

model:=[y*alpha[1, 2], z*alpha[2, 3], x^3*alpha[3, 10] + x*alpha[3, 1] + alpha[3, 0]]:

fullmodel:=[x^3*alpha[1, 10] + x^2*y*alpha[1, 11] + x^2*z*alpha[1, 12] + x*y^2*alpha[1, 13] + x*y*z*alpha[1, 14] + x*z^2*alpha[1, 15] + y^3*alpha[1, 16] + y^2*z*alpha[1, 17] + y*z^2*alpha[1, 18] + z^3*alpha[1, 19] + x^2*alpha[1, 4] + x*y*alpha[1, 5] + x*z*alpha[1, 6] + y^2*alpha[1, 7] + y*z*alpha[1, 8] + z^2*alpha[1, 9] + x*alpha[1, 1] + y*alpha[1, 2] + z*alpha[1, 3] + alpha[1, 0], x^3*alpha[2, 10] + x^2*y*alpha[2, 11] + x^2*z*alpha[2, 12] + x*y^2*alpha[2, 13] + x*y*z*alpha[2, 14] + x*z^2*alpha[2, 15] + y^3*alpha[2, 16] + y^2*z*alpha[2, 17] + y*z^2*alpha[2, 18] + z^3*alpha[2, 19] + x^2*alpha[2, 4] + x*y*alpha[2, 5] + x*z*alpha[2, 6] + y^2*alpha[2, 7] + y*z*alpha[2, 8] + z^2*alpha[2, 9] + x*alpha[2, 1] + y*alpha[2, 2] + z*alpha[2, 3] + alpha[2, 0], x^3*alpha[3, 10] + x^2*y*alpha[3, 11] + x^2*z*alpha[3, 12] + x*y^2*alpha[3, 13] + x*y*z*alpha[3, 14] + x*z^2*alpha[3, 15] + y^3*alpha[3, 16] + y^2*z*alpha[3, 17] + y*z^2*alpha[3, 18] + z^3*alpha[3, 19] + x^2*alpha[3, 4] + x*y*alpha[3, 5] + x*z*alpha[3, 6] + y^2*alpha[3, 7] + y*z*alpha[3, 8] + z^2*alpha[3, 9] + x*alpha[3, 1] + y*alpha[3, 2] + z*alpha[3, 3] + alpha[3, 0]]:

vars:=[x,y,z]:

ans:=generateNonlinearModelsPlus(model,fullmodel,vars)

Many thanks.

For quite some time, I have wanted to solve the system attached in "test" using Maple. The smallest solution in natural numbers x, y, and z test.mw

Download test.mw

is known, and all these numbers are less than 4 × 10¹². Is this possible in Maple?

(x=1633780814400; y=252782198228; z=3474741058973)