@Carl Love 

Long time, but thank you!

I am sorry guys I didn't include the code as well in the message. The thought did not cross my mind. But thank you guys for helping me out with this. I don't care too much creating a procedure inside a procedure as long as I can solve the heart of the problem.

I tried other functions other than Vector, but I didn't better results from them. I didn't know Vector returns 0s only, though, so that explains my problem.

@Carl Love 

Worked like a charm. 

Thank you very much!

@Carl Love 

Wow, thank you very much! This was very helpful! 

@Preben Alsholm 

Not necessarily, max. The exercises' description doesn't mention such restriction (sorry for not having included this detail before).

All is well, though. You two helped me figure out how to solve the exercise.

Thank you!

@acer Okay, got it! Thank you very much as well! I love this forum!

@Carl Love Wow, thanks a lot! That was really helpful! I wish I could contribute to Maple Primes too (you guys have helped me so much), but I don't know much about Maple :/

Thanks, man! I have another program for solving linear systems and on it I had to use x:=Vector(n) so I had assumed my Gauss-Seidel program needed it too. With your help I was able to make my Jacobi program work as well!

The program is indeed just a homework assignment.

Thanks, man! I have another program for solving linear systems and on it I had to use x:=Vector(n) so I had assumed my Gauss-Seidel program needed it too. With your help I was able to make my Jacobi program work as well!

The program is indeed just a homework assignment.

Thank you so much!! You've got no idea how much you've helped me!! I've spent days trying to figure out how to do those things! Thank you so much again!

Thank you so much!! You've got no idea how much you've helped me!! I've spent days trying to figure out how to do those things! Thank you so much again!

I can't say I understand what you did, but it worked like a charm :P

Thank you very much!!

Ah, there is one last thing I need help with and I don't know if I'm asking for too much but... What I would like to know is if there's a way to tell Maple to plot a graph for each X (after the end of the loop), considering that the independent variable is T?

I can't say I understand what you did, but it worked like a charm :P

Thank you very much!!

Ah, there is one last thing I need help with and I don't know if I'm asking for too much but... What I would like to know is if there's a way to tell Maple to plot a graph for each X (after the end of the loop), considering that the independent variable is T?