Each of my two previous two blog posts (Maple Gems, More Maple Gems) contained five "gems" from my Little Red Book of Maple Magic, a red ring-binder in which I record those wonderful bits of Maple functionality that I glean from interacting with the Maple programmers in the building. Here are five more such "gems" that appeared in a Tips & Techniques column in a recent issue of the Maple Reporter.

|
Gem 11 - Picard Iterates
|
|
A basic existence and uniqueness theorem for the initial value problem , is based on the convergence of the Picard iterates . For example, the initial value problem
 
whose solution is


has Picard iterates given by the task template in Table 1.
 
Tools_Tasks_Browse
Differential Equations_ODEs_Picard Iterates
|
Picard Iterates for the IVP
|
The function 
|
> |

|

|
(1.1) |
|
Set
|
> |

|

|
(1.2) |
|
Set 
|
> |

|

|
(1.3) |
|
Number of iterates
|
> |

|

|
(1.4) |
|
Picard Iterates
|
> |

|

|
(1.5) |
|
|
Table 1 Picard iterates for 
|

The limit of these iterates is not easy to deduce. However, the guessgf function in the gfun package provides the following resolution, which is the essence of this gem.



Experiment shows that is the first iterate for which guessgf can determine the exact solution.

|
|
Gem 12 - Combining Radicals
|
|
The task template in Table 2 implements the command interface(imaginaryunit=i); that sets in place of the default . Clicking the OK button collapses the display.
Tools_Tasks_Browse
Algebra_Complex Arithmetic_Set Imaginary Unit
|
|
Table 2 Task template for setting the imaginary unit
|
For nonnegative , is an identity. One way to verify this algebraically in Maple is
= 

However, it is not obvious that this equation is an identity only for . Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate one method of determining this condition. Figure 1 is a graph of the real part of the difference between
while Figure 2 is a graph of the imaginary part of the difference.
|
|
Figure 1 Real part
|
Figure 2 Imaginary part
|
Figure 1 implies that has to be real for the identity to hold, and Figure 2 shows that has to be nonnegative. Of course, the gem is the use of graphs of the real and imaginary parts of a complex expression to determine its behavior over the complex plane.

|
|
Gem 14 - A Sum-to-Product Trig Identity
|
|
For a basic trig identity such as

Maple converts the left side to the right via
=  

and the right side to the left via
=  

However, for the identity


Maple converts the right side to the left via
=  

but struggles to convert the left side to the right. Table 3 summarizes calculations suggested for the conversion of the sum to the product.

|

|


|


|


|
Table 3 Conversion of a trig sum to a product
|

Alternatives I hope my readers explore include applyrule and simplify (with side relations). I'll be sure to include (with attribution and admiration), the best of these in my Little Red Book.
|
|
Gem 15 - Sort Strategies
|
|
Over the years, I've dabbled with the sort command, using it to sort lists of real numbers, polynomials, and lists containing both real and complex numbers. Here's a summary of what I've learned about sort.
By default, sort can sort real numbers that are of type numeric. A number such as is not of type numeric! (The following command verifies this assertion.)
=  
Hence, a naive use of sort will fail on a list containing such exact expressions. Table 4 shows two lists, one with, and one without numbers that are all of type numeric. The sort command easily sorts on the first, but requires an auxiliary function for the second. For the second list, the second argument to sort must be a function that returns true if a comparison between two elements is ordered "correctly" and false if not.


|


|

|


|
Table 4 Sorting lists of real numbers
|

Sorting a list containing both real and complex numbers presents more of a challenge. Of course, the complex field is not ordered, but if, say, the zeros of an equation are both real and complex and a unique ordering of these zeros is needed for the continuing computations, then some method of sorting the list of zeros has to be devised. Suppose the zeros are to be sorted in ascending order of the real parts, and if there are zeros with the same real part but different imaginary parts, sort these in ascending order of the imaginary part. This would give a unique order of such a list of zeros.
The procedure defined below is a function that implements the appropriate comparisons.

If we use this function to sort the list


we get



Sorting the powers in a polynomial is actually easier than sorting "numbers", as we see in the following example.


Sorting a list of reciprocal powers of , such as


yields to a sort on degree (here, negative integers), as we see from


|
(5.1) |

|
Download: Yet_More_Gems_V2.mw