Hi,

I have a large expression of 10 variables that contains many rational terms. I would like to manipulate it from the form a^2*b^2*c^(-2)*d into for example ((a*b)/c)^2*d. And I want to do this for all terms and combine all variables of power 2.

I know how to do this for arbitrary power a^n/b^n to (a/b)^n but since I have n=2 maple automatically writes (a/b)^2=a^2/b^2 which is what I don't want.

Many thanks 

Hi,

i have a loop as follows

for i from 0 to 10 do
>
> y:= i/2;
>
> f:= 2*x+y;
>
> plot(f,x);
>
> end
> ;

i want each graph with different color depend upon the value of y. in other mean, for each value of y, the color of the graph is defferent. 

could you help me in this problem?

Hello,

my problem is quite complicated, so will try to discribe it shortly.

I am developing a model over 100 periods of time. The value at time t, depends on other values at time t and of the value of the variable itself in the period before (t-1).

For example:

Y_t= K_t^a * L_t^b

K_t= Y_t-1 - C_t-1

C_t-1=C_0 * (1+gC_t-1)^t-1

gC_t-1 depends again on Y_t-1

I thoght of...

I have used the FourierTransform command in Maple 14 and I have identified high frequency content in a signal (data collected).

I would like to filter out the high frequency content but I cannot find a command which does that and nor could I find a post about doing so.

There is a package, HarmonicAnalyses, for sale, which I could purchase.

Is there anyway to do this with Maple 14?

Would the Harmonic Analyses package do what I want? 

Hi! I have a problem with the total PDE linear system:

F=F(x,y,z,w,h);

X1(F)=F[x]+F[y]+F[z]+F[w]=0;

X2(F)=x*F[x]+y*F[y]+z*F[z]+w*F[w] - h*F[h]=0;

X3(F)=x^2*F[x]+y^2*F[y]+z^2*F[z]+w^2*F[w] - ((z-x)*h+C*(w-y)/(z-x))F[h]=0;  (C=const)

The Poisson brackets are:

[X1,X2]=X1, [X1,X3]=2*X2, [X2,X3]=X3.

I'v tried to solve this system with pdsolve, but F=const is the only Maple's answer. But I am sure that this system has a...

I love using the inequal function to plot the feasible region for a 2-d linear programming problem.  Is there a function that does the same thing in 3-d?

Thank you.

I was using the Matlab toolbox in Maple 13 and everything was great until I upgraded Matlab from version 2008b to 2010b. Is it that the new vesrion is not supported? Or can I work around that?

Thank you.

Fernando

So I have an image given by plot[some function] and I need a table with 2 columns - x and f(x)...

In a previous question I answered I had attempted to turn what I did into a proc.  It works fine by itself but when it's in a proc it won't display both plots.  Not sure if it's because there's too many levels of calling or if it's a bug. 

plotoversurface:=proc(p1,s1)
  local a,b,to3d,c:
  a:=plot3d([s1],x=-10..10,y=0..100,style=patchnogrid):
  b:=plot(p1):
  to3d:=plottools:-transform((x,y)->[x,y,s1]):
  c:=to3d(b):

Dear friends,

    The Physics package in Maple is a good tool for quantum physics. However, I came across some problems with the package when I performed a computation. Please see the figure.

The left-hand code (last two lines) shows Amx.Amy.Ket(x,1,1)=”-Ket(x,0,0)”. However, I believe that the answer is wrong; it seems that the negative sign should not be here.

The “am.Ket(B,4)=2ket(B,3)”

Hi,

I would like to compare different decision methods. All these methods can be described in general with the  following function:

f:= (X::Matrix,C::Vector)-> TerminalScores::Vector

In my comparison I fix C, and X to constant numeric values. The exception is  X[1,1] :=t parameter. Hence with the unapply(f(X,C),t) I can generate a single-parameter function for each method.

Fist, I would like to diffrentiate the methods (f1, f2, f3...

I'm going to put this plot into LaTeX, so it'd be nice if the font is similar. Both equations are functions of one variable.

Is there a nice, concise command to do this? Additionally, what's the easiest way to export this graph into a format useable by pdfLaTeX?

Thanks so much!

I'm running Maple 14, if that matters.

Hi everybody:

I was wondering if there's a tool in maple that would allow you to plot a function f(x,y) over a geometric shape (e,g,, a triangle). Sort of like the Matlab logo if you know what I mean. Or even simpler: for x=0,y=0..10, sin(y), and y=10,x=0..10, sin(x)

thanks a lot

dimitrios

Maples own spiralgraph or kalidascope.

It's kind of annoying sometimes when you create a plot and you haven't got enough points to see a nice smooth curve.  It's an easy fix, of course. Just add numpoints=x where x is any number you want.

However, that being neglected this simple little animation reminded me of the spiralgraph craze in the early 80's, or could even be a kalidascope if the colors changed.

with(plots):
animate(spacecurve,[[sin(x*t),x,cos(x*t)...

It's been a while since I wrote one of these random posts, but I still have a couple more I wanted to write.  In this post, I want to describe one of the tests used in the paper that initially inspired this series of posts: the Wald-Wolfowitz runs test.  This test is interesting in that it does not test for uniformity