Up until now, I have been using lists instead of sets in solve() in order to ensure the first equation is solved for the first variable, the second for the second, etc.  However, I have run into a case for which using an equation list and a variable list does not work, but the equation list alone is fine, and sets of both are fine, etc.  I would be grateful if somebody can explain why the first statement below does not produce a solution.

> soln := solve([foc1 = 0, foc2 = 0, foc3 = 0...

At one step of my code I need to define an array of functions which I will later use.

Simplified version of it to highlight the problem:

restart:with(linalg):
procG:=proc(a,b) if a>b then a-b else 0 end if end proc:
F:=vector(2):
for i from 1 to 2 do F[i]:=x->i*procG(x,0) end;

In the actual code array is much bigger and the expression for each function is much more complicated so using the cycle is a real 'must'.

Instead of F[1...

for example:

>>simplify(cos(i)*sin(u)/sin(i),trig)

                    cos(i)*sin(u)/sin(i)

Maple do'not  simplify cos(i)/sin(i)=ctan(i) atomaticly.

also  half angle formulas:

>>simplify(sin(i)/(cos(i)+1),trig)

           sin(i)/(cos(i)+1)

i want to get tan(i/f)

I have an ODE to solve that looks like this: 

((diff(R(r), r, r, r, r))*r^4+3*(diff(R(r), r))*r-3*(diff(R(r), r, r))*r^2+2*(diff(R(r), r, r, r))*r^3-3*R(r)+4*R(r)*n+2*R(r)*n^2-4*(diff(R(r), r))*r*n+2*(diff(R(r), r))*r*n^2+4*(diff(R(r), r, r))*r^2*n-2*(diff(R(r), r, r))*r^2*n^2-4*R(r)*n^3+R(r)*n^4)/r^4 = (-108-1362*n+2122*n^2+2019*n^3-3032*n^4+401*n^7+1192*n^6-1033*n^5-25*n^9+6*n^10-180*n^8-4128*r^(n+3)*n^3+2304*r^(n+3)*n-576*r^(n+5)*n-760*n^6*r+575*n^5*r-244*n^7*r-2108*n^3*r-11616*r^(n+3...

old version define use
'homalg/default':=RPI;

in maple 15
libname := "D:/homoalg/10_homalg.lib",libname:
with(homalg):

> define(homalg, RPI, 'default');
Error, (in define) homalg is assigned
> hom2 := Hom(L, K, var);
Error, (in homalg/tablename) Since homalg/default is not defined, the last argument must be a table containing the (minimum) homalg conversions or an unassigned symbol pointing to such a table!
> define(homalg, 'RPI', 'default');

Maple 13

hmm... I don't really understand the diference between a question and a post, but here goes.

I homeschool my two grandchildren in the 8th and 10th grades. they are not taking calculus or precalc yet. Lately we have been studing systems of equations. what I used to call simultaneous equations. We find the x-y intercepts and plot them. We also work backward and find the equation from the intercepts.

My question is this: Is there a built-in function such as Built-in-Function([0, 4...

how can I solve this equation

I want to solve numerically the nonlinear problem 

a*(diff(y(x), x, x))+2*(diff(y(x), x))+exp(y(x)) = 0, y(0) = 0, y(1) = 0

by defining my own method defined as 

y_n+1=y_n+2*h*(-2*y_n+2*ln(2/(1+x))-(1/2)*a)^2/(a*(-4*y_n+4*ln(2/(1+x))-a-h*(4*y_n-4*ln(2/(1+x))+a+x+1)/a))

where h is the step-size. Please help me by letting me know how can I do this using Maple 11.

Hi,

I was wondering if anyone has suggestions how to get answer to this integral?

I know how to do a discrete approximation, but I am looking for the closed form.

c>0. n is an integer>0. If someone knows how to do specific values of n, that would be interesting too!

Also, replacing the Chebyshev function by a monomial in x (i.e. x^n) would be equivalent.

Thanks.

I have an older tablet PC on which I recently used Windows Journal for handwriting and storing my lecture notes (on the swivel screen with a stylus). However, Windows Journal is very basic (doesn't interact with Maple or anything else other than pasting images into it) and has very limited drawing capabilities (rectangles, ellipses, and only horizontal lines).

What tablet PC apps do you recommend for handwriting, drawing, etc. that interact well with Maple

Hey there,

i have a differential equation in the form below and the expression c1*x(t) should only be positive. Has someone an idea how to solve this problem?

I want to write the equation of the line which passing the two point A(1, 1) and B(m+1, -2*m + 2) by using LinearAlgebra, but i can not write. Please help me. Thank you.

I've observed different behaviour in Maple 16 when invoking the plot() command with the coords=polar option.

Here's what Maple 15 produces:

...and here is what I get in Maple 16:

This is the first time I used the Maple software so I haven't known clearly about it. could you give me a document about " How to use Maple ".

Thank you.