I wonder what is the general view on this.

Maple tries hard to find analytical solutions by trying different algorithms. Which is very good. But the question is, should it also hang doing this? Should not there be a circuit breaker to prevent the hang?

I mean there must be a limited number of algorithms it tries. So at one point one would expect it will finish and return either no solution or the solution it found.

For this Abel ode   y'=x+y^3, which is known not to be solvable, Maple hangs on 

           > Step 2: calculating resultants to eliminate F and get candidates for 

I waited for almost one hour. Clearly this indicates a problem internally. Right?

There should be some internal checks to prevent this hang I would think.  I do not know where it actually hangs, since trace only shows the last step above.

It will good to find out the cause of the hang and add code to prevent this in a future version of Maple dsolve to make it more robust.

btw, using that another software, it returns instantly on this ode with no solution. May be the other software did not try as hard, but at least it did not hang :)

Download why_hangs_dsolve_april_18_2025.mw

Occasionally I want to convert 2D-Math input to 1D-Math input. This is either not fully working with comments or changes the format. Example:

Also pasting code with comments in MaplePrimes (function insert code snippet) removes comments.

Any other ways? Ideally, I would also like to convert a whole document in one go, That is probably asked too much.

Download convert_comment_to_1D.mw

Hello
I would like to write a Maple program that gives me all possible sums >=  a given maximum maxsum and with and odd number q >= 3 of distinct summands from a given list. q can be 3, 5, 7, .. t, where t is odd and depends on L and max.

Example:
maxsum:=97, L := [9,15,21,25,27,33,35,39,45,49,51,55,57,63,65,69,75,77,81,85,87].

Here t= 3 and only q=3 is possible. In the final version of the program the list L and the maxsum will be much larger, so that the sums for every odd q =3, 5, 7, ..., t.

I tried to write a code for this basic case:

q := 3:
p := 91:
L := [9,15,21,25,27,33,35,39,45,49,51,55,57,63,65,69,75,77,81,85,87]:
M := []:

NestedLoops := proc(startIndex, remainingDepth, currentSum)
    local i;
    if remainingDepth = 0 then
        if currentSum <= p then
            M := [op(M), currentSum]:
        end if;
        return:
    end if;

    for i from startIndex to nops(L) - remainingDepth + 1 do
        NestedLoops(i + 1, remainingDepth - 1, currentSum + L[i]):
    od;
end proc:

NestedLoops(1, q, 0);
M;

The result ist "[]". What is wrong? How would be a correct and efficient version?

Thanks for helping me.

Do you think could be a bug in dsolve? 

Download dsolve_division_by_zero_abel_april_16_2025.mw

If I do not tell it to use Abel, then dsolve does not give divison by zero.

Maple 2025 on Linux

As shown in the paper, and in many similar ones, the authors use a particular method that I believe is related to the long wave limit. I’m familiar with other approaches, but the traditional methods haven’t been successful in this case. This author, along with a few others, has tried applying this long wave limit approach, though many papers don’t explicitly mention the substitutions they use to arrive at the lump solution.

I’ve been able to separately find the lump series, but for some of the other solutions, we first need to figure out how to derive this key result. Once that part is clear, the rest should be easier to handle. I've been working through everything step by step and have managed to reproduce many of the solutions from the paper.

Also i don't know how finding (eq17) in paper, which they found by apply long wave limit to (eq7) in paper

additionaly How finding line which i think they found by finding velocity?

Please, if you have any information or insight into how we can obtain this more difficult result, I would really appreciate your help.

Download LWL.mw

Where is my question ?  
No reason to delete this...nothing copy righted code 

Hello! How can I plot a tiling of regular 6-gons in Maple, and paint it using three colors?

Maybe someone would be so kind as to share the code for such a tiling.

in try to figure out why in some function i can find this critical point for ploting i need that point , untill now i just find in one function and other i can't and my program not runing for other and really this is make problem for my invistigation i want to fixed that and i upload that file i did and that file i can't find it for , thanks for any help?

line-undone.mw

Line-1-Done.mw

I can't find the help page for Abel second kind, class B. 

Maple has help page for Abel second kind, class A and Abel second kind, class C. But not for class B. 

Here is an example of Abel second kind class B

ode:=(3*t*y(t)+y(t)^2)+(t^2+t*y(t))*diff(y(t),t)=0;
DEtools:-odeadvisor(ode)

I wanted to know the difference and the transformation used for class B to make it Abel first kind.

I googled and can't find it. Also local help skips over class B.

Is this documented somewhere else?

btw, find error on the help page for class A. Transformation used is wrong. Will leave this for another question.

I'm not currently working on the topic of fluids and I'm not very familiar with it. However, my partner is working on it and is using other software. They have a question about whether Maple can handle this kind of work. Are there any examples available? I’d appreciate any help

thanks!

Dear Maple experts,

is there a possibility/command to get a vizualization of the output of the command FeedbackConnect?

I was thinking of something like this:


as it is given on the maple-help page for that command (but not generated via a maple command as far as I understood)

Thanks in advance !

I have repeatedly seen this on two Windows PCs:

The assignement operator := is rendered as a roman d

This happens after using Maple for some time.
 Exiting Maple and restart of Maple is required. Has someone noticed the same?
All on Windows 10 and for sure in screen reader mode (my default, cannot report on the new GUI).

Please, I am encountering error trying to run these codes for sensitivity analysis using the formula for sensitivity analysis

Download Computed_Sensitivity_Analys_for_CBD.mw

Dear Maple experts,

I try to avoid the generation of new variable names (for states, inputs, outputs) introduced automatically by maple (StateSpace(), FeedbackConnect()) in the two (connected) cases:

1)

I generated a discrete StateSpace system using a difference equation:

sys2 := StateSpace([u(n)=K_virt*(q_a(n)-q_d)+D_virt*(q_a(n)-q_a(n-1))/T],inputvariable=[q_a(n)],outputvariable=[u(n)],discrete=true,sampletime=T);

The statevariable "x1(n)" is automatically generated by maple

I tried to avoid this by using the following commands that don't work:

sys2 := StateSpace([u(n)=K_virt*(q_a(n)-q_d)+D_virt*(q_a(n)-q_a(n-1))/T],inputvariable=[q_a(n)],outputvariable=[u(n)],statevariable=[q_a(n-1)],discrete=true,sampletime=T);

-> error message:

Error, (in ProcessOptions) argument 'statevariable = [q_a(n-1)]' invalid: rhs should be of type list({name, anyfunc(name)})

sys2 := StateSpace([u(n)=K_virt*(q_a(n)-q_d)+D_virt*(q_a(n)-q_a(n-1))/T],inputvariable=[q_a(n)],outputvariable=[u(n)],statevariable=[q_a_delayed],discrete=true,sampletime=T);

-> error message:

Error, (in DynamicSystems:-StateSpace) missing state(s): {q_a_delayed(n)}

sys2 := StateSpace([u(n)=K_virt*(q_a(n)-q_d)+D_virt*(q_a(n)-q_a(n-1))/T],inputvariable=[q_a(n)],outputvariable=[u(n)],statevariable=[q_a_delayed(n)],discrete=true,sampletime=T);

-> error message:

Error, (in DynamicSystems:-StateSpace) missing state(s): {q_a_delayed(n)}

Can you help me here?

2)

I have two discrete StateSpace models (sys1, sys2):

* sys2 is the one from above (1 input, 1 output, 1 state)

* sys1 (2 inputs, 4 outputs, 4 states) doesn't contain any automatically generated variables (I obtained this one by transforming a continuous statespace model to a discrete one)

* variables that represent the same signal have the same name in both systems.

   -> "q_a(n)" appears as an output in sys1 and as an input in in sys2

   -> "u(n)"     appears as an input in sys1 and as an output in in sys2

Now I combined these two models via:

FeedbackConnect([sys1, sys2],[[2,2,1,-1]])

Instead of using the variable names I introduced maple generates new variable names for inputs, outputs and states.

How can I avoid this?

(the option "merge=evaluate") seems not to work (even if I work with numeric values for the system parameters instead of symbols)

Thank you in advance!

It seems that the new Ribbon interface has several bugs (probably an update will come soon). So, not only the Export As is not working, but I see that (at least in Windows), opening a worksheet with a large output will display the output using the Maple input font.
Just save a .mw with the content:

expand((x+1)^200);

and then open it.