Hi,

I am having trouble getting a pattern match to the Heaviside function.

patmatch(Heaviside(x), Heaviside(a::algebraic))

returns "false" whereas I would expect it to return true.

On the other hand:

patmatch(Heaviside(x), Heaviside(x::algebraic))

returns true.

What am I missing?

Regards.

HI,

Can anyone suggest the tutorial or good examples for parallel computing in maple.

Thanks in advance.

how to use python to call maple and scroll up or down scrollbar

what does this mean:"Error, (in EpResult) cannot evaluate the solution further right of 0.36919453e-2, probably a singularity" as I cannot find any relevant material of this error.

I am simulating a condition and get to the final stage of calculation, and this error occurs....

Hi everybody, 

Could somebody just explain me why commands L[1..5] and L[3..6] below do not seem to return "the same type of thing" ?

Thank you for your attention

Download array.mw

Hey,

I want to solve this equation and looking at the plot there are at least 3 solutions. I want the greatest/smallest negative solution. Unfortunately using solve with assumptions produces no results and solve without assumptions only finds two solutions.

Can you please help me?

Download select_solution.mw

Thanks!

Honigmelone

hi

how i can plot 4 curve in one graph in maple??

this data is given in excel format as below

thanks

16.3.xlsx

hi

please help me for remove this error in fsolve...

thanks

torbi4.mw

Download torbi4.mw

how to specify color at the turning point of mountain shape in dualaxisplot

woud like to specify a point with another color at the top of peak shape line diagram

Hi,

This is regarding numerical solution of a function and plot. I have a function in the form of , and i need to plot it with omega (as the expression is too long i cant insert it here). Now, if i am changing the range of omega in plot command then I am getting different plots for the small values of omega. Let's say if i change the range from 1..10 to 1..50 and look at the plot in the range of 1..3 then the plots looks different. Apart from this if i change the value of Digits  from 10 to 30 or 40 then every time i am getting an entire different  plot. As the expression if too long i cant convert it to Matlab expression and plot there. How to fix these issues. Please help me regarding this.

Regarding

Sunit

Dear all,

I am trying to solve the following equation:

y(z) = F(z) + int(sqrt(z - sigma)*y(sigma), sigma = 0..z);

intsolve(%, y(z));

But i get the following error: 

Error, (in intsolve) numeric exception: division by zero

My guess would be that there appears a limit in the calculation which exists but is not evaluated properly by Maple. Is it possible to pass this kind of exception (comparable to http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/errors/view.aspx?path=Error,%20numeric%20exception%3A%20division%20by%20zero)

Thanks and best regards

Ferdinand

I have tried to solve a matrix with the function "LinearSolve" as seen in the picture, but instead of solving it just gives me back the operation i wrote (3). My which is to solve an equation system a quick as possible - have a templet fill in the matrix and press enter. I thought this "LinearSolve" function was the easiest way of doing. I know that I can right click and choose the function, but I want it as a command.

Any solutions on how to use the "LinearSolve" command to solve an equation system?

Hi, 

I'm solving a 2D grid with some finite-diference methods. The result is a surface, i.e f(x,y) = z. Where X and Y and points on a grid. 

I then need to integrate over this grid, i.e

int(f(x,y),[x=0..10, y=0..10]) 

I have tried interpolating the grid. I've used CurveFitting:-ArrayInterpolation() to interpolate points in this 2D space and then integrate over them. 

I'm using a 30x30 grid, but this interpolation scheme takes far too long. The function generated from the ArrayInterpolation creates an interpolation every time a point is evaluated, which I assume is why the integral is very computationally expensive. 

I would like to create a piecewise analytic function from the 2-D grid, perhaps using CurveFitting:-Spline(), however from my understanding this only works for 1D objects? 

Is there any better solution for integrating a 2D numeric grid?

Thanks in advance

After using the Groebner and PolynomialIdeals packages, Maple goes into a long calculation when I make an entry of the form

name:=polynomial expression. This can take 10's of minutes for an expression of two lines. The only solution I have found is to save the sheet and restart it and enter the line name:= etc. before loading Groebner and PolynomialIdeals. This is most inconvenient. Is there a better workaround?

Hello

I am working my way back to use Maple for some calculations I did in the past.   ListTools seems to have some of the functions I need but I couldn't find anything that gives me the position of all groups of repeated elements in a list of a list.  For instance, ListTools:~MakeUnique removes the copies of all repeated elements but it seems that there is no counterpart function that gives the position of the repeated elements, is there?

Search and SearchAll return position but they seem to be the only ones.  

Example:

a:=[[x+y+z],[2*x+y+z],[x-y+z],[2*x+y+z]];

and the expected output would be

pos:=[[1],[2,4],[3]];

Many thanks

Ed