MaplePrimes Questions

Plz help me friends ...

I gave this function ...

fuction_A.docx

i wanna extract coeffitions from this function ... for example what is the coeffition of phi(X)*psi(x)?

i used coeff ... but it had an error ..

unable compute coeff ...

i used collect ... but it had an error

what am i doing with this problem?

:(

 

I have just begun thinking of trying to make some mathematically defined objects using a 3d printer. I would be happy to hear from anyone who has done this using Maple to prepare input. Pointers for a novice in 3d printing would be appreciated.  I have access to a MakerBot Replicator 2. But the people who have it have only used it to scan objects and make 3d copies of them. 

---Edwin

Find parametric equations for the right circular cylinder having radius 3, length 12, whose axis is the z-axis and whose bottom edge lies in the plane: z=0.

 

 

Do I just define B={u1, u2, u3} being a basis for R3 and use the gram-schmidt operator to find the parametric equations?

I know that would give me an orthonrmal basis, but how do i find parametirc equations?

Hi MaplePrime-ers,

I'm using the following piece of code to (i) solve the system of symbolically, so I can (ii) evaluate equations quickly at many points of time.  This works quite well for 4 defined values, but I'm having problems adding a 5th defined value.  Specifically, solve leaves the "solution may be lost" message after taking forever.  As the symbolic solution will be run mulitple times by a optimziation algorithm, I'd ideally like to get the solve time under 2 minutes.  I've attached both executed worksheets.  Is there anything I can do to have solve work as I intend?

This first code snippet achieves what I would like to do Series_noGear.mw:

 

#Interconnection Equations
eq2[1] := FD_T + EM2_T = 0;
eq2[2] := ICE_T + GEN_T = 0;
eq2[3] := EM2_A + GEN_A + BAT_A = 0;
eq2[4] := -FD_W + EM2_W = 0;
eq2[5] := -ICE_W + GEN_W = 0;
eq2[6] := -EM2_V + GEN_V = 0;
eq2[7] := -EM2_V + BAT_V = 0;

#ICE
eq_c[1] := ICE_mdot_g= ICE_T * ICE_W;

#BAT
eq_c[2] := BAT_V = 271;

#EM2
EM2_ReqPow_eq := (-148.3) + (4.267)*abs(EM2_W) + (12.77)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.0364)*abs(EM2_W)^2 + ( 1.16)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.258)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 0.0001181)*abs(EM2_W)^3 + (-0.0005994)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T) + ( 0.0001171)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + (0.001739 )*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-1.245e-07 )*abs(EM2_W)^4 + ( 1.2e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^3*abs(EM2_T) + ( -1.584e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 4.383e-07)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-2.947e-06)*abs(EM2_T)^4;
eq_c[3] := EM2_P = piecewise( EM2_T * EM2_W = 0, 0, EM2_W*EM2_T < 0,-1 * EM2_ReqPow_eq, EM2_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[4] := EM2_A = EM2_P/EM2_V;

#GEN
GEN_ReqPow_eq:= (-5.28e-12) + ( 3.849e-14)*abs(GEN_W) + (-71.9)*abs(GEN_T) + (-1.168e-16)*abs(GEN_W)^2 +(1.296)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T) + (2.489)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (1.451e-19)*abs(GEN_W)^3 + (0.0001326)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T) + (-0.008141)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (-0.004539)*abs(GEN_T)^3 +(-6.325e-23)*abs(GEN_W)^4 + (-2.091e-07)*abs(GEN_W)^3*abs(GEN_T) + ( 3.455e-06)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T)^2 + ( 2.499e-05)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^3 + (-5.321e-05)*abs(GEN_T)^4;

eq_c[5] := GEN_P = piecewise(GEN_T * GEN_W = 0, 0, GEN_W*GEN_T < 0,-1 * GEN_ReqPow_eq, GEN_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[6] := GEN_A = GEN_P/GEN_V;

#assumptions
assume(BAT_V::nonnegative);
assume(FD_W::nonnegative);

termeqs := {eq_c[1],eq_c[2],eq_c[3],eq_c[4],eq_c[5],eq_c[6]};

sys_eqs2 := termeqs union convert(eq2,set);

drivers2:= {ICE_T,ICE_W,FD_T,FD_W};
symvarnames2:=select(type,indets(convert(sys_eqs2,list)),name);
notdrivers2:=symvarnames2 minus drivers2;

sol2:=solve(sys_eqs2,notdrivers2) assuming real;

symb_sol2:=unapply(sol2,[drivers2[]]);

symb_sol2(1,2,3,5);

#Enumerate (there will generally be about 40, not 3)

count := 0;
for i1 from 1 to 3 do
     for i2 from 1 to 3 do
          for i3 from 1 to 3 do
               for i4 from 1 to 3 do
                    count := count + 1;
                    solsol2(count) := symb_sol2(i1,i2,i3,i4);
               od; 
          od;
     od;
od;
count;

This second code snippet includes the changes in bold, which make solve take forever Series_addGear.mw:

#Interconnection Equations
eq2[1] := FD_T + EM2_T = 0;
eq2[2] := ICE_T + GBb_T = 0;
eq2[3] := EM2_A + GEN_A + BAT_A = 0;
eq2[4] := -FD_W + EM2_W = 0;
eq2[5] := -ICE_W + GBb_W = 0;
eq2[6] := -EM2_V + GEN_V = 0;
eq2[7] := -EM2_V + BAT_V = 0;
eq2[8] := GBa_T + GEN_T = 0;
eq2[9] := -GBa_W + GEN_W = 0;

#ICE
eq_c[1] := ICE_mdot_g= ICE_T * ICE_W;

#BAT
eq_c[2] := BAT_V = 271;

#EM2
EM2_ReqPow_eq := (-148.3) + (4.267)*abs(EM2_W) + (12.77)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.0364)*abs(EM2_W)^2 + ( 1.16)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T) + (-0.258)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 0.0001181)*abs(EM2_W)^3 + (-0.0005994)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T) + ( 0.0001171)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^2 + (0.001739 )*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-1.245e-07 )*abs(EM2_W)^4 + ( 1.2e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^3*abs(EM2_T) + ( -1.584e-06)*abs(EM2_W)^2*abs(EM2_T)^2 + ( 4.383e-07)*abs(EM2_W)*abs(EM2_T)^3 + (-2.947e-06)*abs(EM2_T)^4;
eq_c[3] := EM2_P = piecewise( EM2_T * EM2_W = 0, 0, EM2_W*EM2_T < 0,-1 * EM2_ReqPow_eq, EM2_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[4] := EM2_A = EM2_P/EM2_V;

#GEN
GEN_ReqPow_eq:= (-5.28e-12) + ( 3.849e-14)*abs(GEN_W) + (-71.9)*abs(GEN_T) + (-1.168e-16)*abs(GEN_W)^2 +(1.296)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T) + (2.489)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (1.451e-19)*abs(GEN_W)^3 + (0.0001326)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T) + (-0.008141)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^2 + (-0.004539)*abs(GEN_T)^3 +(-6.325e-23)*abs(GEN_W)^4 + (-2.091e-07)*abs(GEN_W)^3*abs(GEN_T) + ( 3.455e-06)*abs(GEN_W)^2*abs(GEN_T)^2 + ( 2.499e-05)*abs(GEN_W)*abs(GEN_T)^3 + (-5.321e-05)*abs(GEN_T)^4;

eq_c[5] := GEN_P = piecewise(GEN_T * GEN_W = 0, 0, GEN_W*GEN_T < 0,-1 * GEN_ReqPow_eq, GEN_ReqPow_eq);
eq_c[6] := GEN_A = GEN_P/GEN_V;

#GB
eq_c[7] := GBb_T = -1/GB_R * GBa_T;
eq_c[8] := GBb_W = GB_R * GBa_W;

assume(BAT_V::nonnegative);
assume(FD_W::nonnegative);
assume(GB_R::nonnegative);

termeqs := {eq_c[1],eq_c[2],eq_c[3],eq_c[4],eq_c[5],eq_c[6],eq_c[7],eq_c[8]};

sys_eqs2 := termeqs union convert(eq2,set);

drivers2:= {GB_R,ICE_T,ICE_W,FD_T,FD_W};
symvarnames2:=select(type,indets(convert(sys_eqs2,list)),name);
notdrivers2:=symvarnames2 minus drivers2;

sol2:=solve(sys_eqs2,notdrivers2) assuming real;

symb_sol2:=unapply(sol2,[drivers2[]]);

 

Does assume make solve work faster, or just complicate things?  Any help is greatly appreciated!

 

Series_addGear.mw

Series_noGear.mw

Hello there

I have to plot wavelet frame functions (framelet) using Maple. Can I send you the figure and help me to learn how to plot it and send me the code. I will pay for you if you can do it. 

Thank you

Hi,

I want to display the matrix M, I used return M, in this procedure, but no matrix M displayed.

restart;
N:=2:
N:=2;
ff:=proc(N)
local M,i,p;
M:=array(1..2*N+1,1..2*N+1):
for i from 1 to 2*N+1 do
for  p from 1  to 2*N+1  do
   if p=1 then M[p,i]:=-2;
    elif  p=2*N+1  then M[p,i]:=-3;
else
M[p,i]:=0;
end if; end do; end do;
return M;
end proc;

 

Many thinks

I'm trying to analytically solve for a Laplace's equation in a unit square with the following BCs: u(x,0) = 0, u(y,0) = 0, u(1,y) = 0, u(x,1) = 1

The series solution to this problem is well-known, where u(x,y) is solved with separation of variables to obtain u in terms of sin and sinh series.

I try to recreate the solution with pdsolve but am stuck with it.

My attempt:

 

lap2d := diff(u(x,y), x, x) + diff(u(x,y), y, y) = 0

sol := pdsolve(lap2d, HINT = X(x)*Y(y), build)  % saw this in mapleprimes

With this I managed to get an expression for u(x,y). My trouble is with the coefficients: _C1, _C2, _C3, _C4, _c_1

_C1 .. _C4 are clearly from integrations, but I am not clear about _c_1?

To solve for the constants of integrations, I tried to set up simultaneuous equations with the BCs.

For example,

eq1 := eval( rhs(sol), x=0) = 0

Similarly, repeat for the other 3 BCs to get eq2, eq3, eq4

I tried to solve these simultaneous eqns with:

solve({eq1, eq2, eq3, eq4}, {_C1, _C2, _C3, _C4})

but Maple does not output anyting.

Need your advice if this is the right way and I just goofed up with the syntax, or there are better ways to construct the series solution of the problem. Should I use linearsolve to find the C's?

I use Maple 17.

 

Thanks in advance

 

 

Who knows: is there a maple command for two matrix multiplication element by element without summing?

 

hi,i can not upload anything to mapleprimes.com every time i want to upload a file, i face error generating page . what should i do ?! 

Dear All,

I have problems after updating of Java to 1.7.0_55 on 14th of April. When I use the Equation Editor to write a math formula inside the Question Editing everything is going right until, after inserting renspose area, I'm going to click on the "Finish" Button. The Question Repository doesn't appear so that It's for me impossible to submit the question just written. Anyone using Maple TA has this problem?

Thank a lot for your help

giuseppe

As am trying to solve this integration:

int(B*eta^(-B)*t^(B-1)*exp(-(t/eta)^B)*(t-n*h), t = n .. (n+1)*h)

where,

ETA:=1000

B:=2.5

But this error keeps coming :

Error, (in Optimization:-NLPSolve) integration range or variable must be specified in the second argument, got 1. = 1. .. 2.

 

Please Help ..

hi all

I want to plot a 2D fig by maple. my data are in an excel file and they are too much to import them one by one manually. When I copy and paste them in maple, they appear in a column... 

thank a lot for your help.

Hi,

Maybe someone can give me a nice answer without Maple.

I am given a fourier series:
ln|cosx|=Co - sum( (-1)^k/k * cos2kx,k=1..infinity)
and am asked what this tells me about the chevychev series for ln(u).

 

Thanks

i want to plot two difrent graph in one diagram.. anyone how to do it?

restart; with(plots); n := .2; B := .5; Ec := 2.0; Pr := 1.0; N := .5; l := 1; rho := .5; c := 1; T := .5; T1 := .5; c1 := .2; c2 := .2; Gr := .5; blt := 5;

Eq1 := diff(f(eta), eta, eta, eta)+f(eta)*(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))-(diff(f(eta), eta))^2+l*B*H(eta)*(F(eta)-(diff(f(eta), eta)))+Gr*theta(eta)-Mn*(diff(f(eta), eta)) = 0;

Eq2 := G(eta)*(diff(F(eta), eta))+F(eta)^2+B*(F(eta)-(diff(f(eta), eta))) = 0;


Eq3 := G(eta)*(diff(G(eta), eta))+B*(f(eta)+G(eta)) = 0;

Eq4 := G(eta)*(diff(H(eta), eta))+H(eta)*(diff(G(eta), eta))+F(eta)*H(eta) = 0;
                 
Eq5 := diff(theta(eta), eta, eta)+Pr*((diff(theta(eta), eta))*f(eta)-2*(diff(f(eta), eta))*theta(eta))+N*Pr*(theta1(eta)-theta(eta))/(rho*c*T)+N*Pr*Ec*(F(eta)-(diff(f(eta), eta)))^2/(rho*T1) = 0;

Eq6 := 2*F(eta)*theta1(eta)+G(eta)*(diff(theta1(eta), eta))+c1*(theta1(eta)-theta(eta))/(c*c2*T) = 0;

bcs1 := f(0) = 0, (D(f))(0) = 1, (D(f))(blt) = 0, F(blt) = 0, G(blt) = -f(blt), H(blt) = n, theta(0) = 1, theta(blt) = 0, theta1(blt) = 0;

L := [0, 1, 2];

for k to 3 do R := dsolve(eval({Eq1, Eq2, Eq3, Eq4, Eq5, Eq6, bcs1}, Mn = L[k]), [f(eta), F(eta), G(eta), H(eta), theta(eta), theta1(eta)], numeric, output = listprocedure); Y || k := rhs(R[3]); YP || k := rhs(R[5]); YR || k := rhs(R[6]); YQ || k := rhs(R[7]); YA || k := rhs(R[8]); YB || k := rhs(R[10]) end do;

plot([Y || (1 .. 3)], 0 .. 10, labels = [eta, (D(f))(eta)]);

 

this comands will comeout to diffrent graph in two diagram.. but i want two graph in one diagram.. any one know how to do it.. beside that.. i want to know how to insert arrow in diagram..

Hi

 I have the following ODEs

Restart:
a:=0.13:
b:=0.41:
reynolds:=1.125*10^8:
Eq1:=diff(f(x),x$3)+diff(f(x),x$2)*f(x)+b^2*sqrt(2*reynolds)*diff(diff(f(x),x$2)*f(x)*x^2,x$1);
Eq2:=diff(g(x),x$3)+diff(g(x),x$2)*g(x)+c*a^2*sqrt(2*reynolds)*diff(diff(g(x),x$2)*x,x$1);
f(0)=0;
D(f(0)):=0;
# continuity condition  
g(0.1*c)=f(0.1*c):
D(g(0.1*c))=D(f(0.1*c)):
(D@2)(g(0.1*c))=(D@2)(f(0.1*c)):

the value of c is unknown which must be obtained via D(g(c)):=1;

 How can I solve it?

Thanks for your attentions in advance

Amir

First 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 Last Page 1434 of 2427