Hi Erik,

Thank you very much for your help, that makes sense! It's breathtaking though, that the inversion of the matrix is getting HUGE like that!

Your argument is very clear, and given this argument I think you're right, that I have to substitute the values first.

You have been very helpful :)

Have a nice weekend, and once again, thanks for your time!

Kind regards

Dennis

Hi Erik,

Thank you very much for your help, that makes sense! It's breathtaking though, that the inversion of the matrix is getting HUGE like that!

Your argument is very clear, and given this argument I think you're right, that I have to substitute the values first.

You have been very helpful :)

Have a nice weekend, and once again, thanks for your time!

Kind regards

Dennis