4 years, 92 days

## MaplePrimes Activity

### These are replies submitted by Test007

@Axel Vogt Thanks, that worked! However, is it possible to get 0 for F[f(x) g(x)] = 1/sqrt(2Pi) × (F[f(x)]∗F[g(x)])(k), where the asterisk (∗) stands for convolution? This is what I got:

 >
 >
 >
 (1)
 >
 (2)
 >
 (3)
 >
 (4)
 >
 (5)
 >

## Formula...

@Rouben Rostamian I was hoping for some way to specify the basis and have Maple evaluate the formula in a single command (like FourierSeries).

## Right BC...

@nm Thanks! The right BC will also be 0 because of the where condition of the eigenvalues.

## NVM, It's the Same...

@Rouben Rostamian NVM, I was testing it with 0..l instead of -Pi..Pi.

@Rouben Rostamian Thanks, the i replacement worked. Did you change some other settings though since I get a different answer for the sine series?

## How?...

@Carl Love Thanks, but could you tell me how you came up with the constants? Is there a general procedure for this and does it apply to other ODEs that have piecewise solutions like this (e.g. ay'' + by' + cy = 0)?

## Why?...

@Carl Love Why? Shouldn't Maple fix this as it's a common scenario?

## So?...

@tomleslie So? OP typed in x^5 + 2*x^3 + 3, which satisfies the requirement if he defined it the alternate way.

## Alternative...

@tomleslie Hmm, isn't it also possible to define it as

f(x) := x^5+2*x^3+3

So I think OP had a legitimate cause for confusion.

## Silly Mistake...

@Carl Love Thanks, it works now! I had an extra minus sign for G in my code.

## x − t Instead of 0...

@Carl Love pdetest returns [2 t − 2 x, 0] for me.

## Possible Bug?...

@Carl Love Is the result not 0? Is that a bug then?

## Conflicting Assumptions?...

What happens if there are conflicting assumptions?

## Second Solution Works!...

@Carl Love The second solution works as intended. Thanks!

## Almost...

@acer Thanks. My original question was incomplete. How can I get Maple to give g(x) - g(-x) as 0?

 Page 1 of 1
﻿