## 541 Reputation

13 years, 322 days

## It runs amazingly...

It runs amazingly fast. Thanks a lot.

## It runs amazingly...

It runs amazingly fast. Thanks a lot.

## It did work well. Thanks...

It did work well. Thanks

## It did work well. Thanks...

It did work well. Thanks

## I found a tricky problem...

I found a tricky problem when using your method: f := a00*x^123+a45*x^233+a02*x^123+a67*x^156+a47*x^67; C := [coeffs(f,x,'M')]: # coefficients M := [M]: # monomials I got what "M" is: [x^233, x^67, x^123, x^156] which is not sorted from low degree to high degree. As a result, the corresponding coefficients are not sorted. I am wondering whether there is a way to fix it. Thanks a lot. Gepo

## I found a tricky problem...

I found a tricky problem when using your method: f := a00*x^123+a45*x^233+a02*x^123+a67*x^156+a47*x^67; C := [coeffs(f,x,'M')]: # coefficients M := [M]: # monomials I got what "M" is: [x^233, x^67, x^123, x^156] which is not sorted from low degree to high degree. As a result, the corresponding coefficients are not sorted. I am wondering whether there is a way to fix it. Thanks a lot. Gepo

## I run a large problem over...

I run a large problem over Maple12 and Singular. The problem is a modulo 2 computation. The result is Maple takes 9 seconds to finish it while Singular is still running over one hour. I did not evaluate Magma, because I cannot find a trial version or free version.

## I did run some experiments...

I did run some experiments using Singular which was much slower than Maple for large problems. How about Magma?

## Pagan's statement is...

Pagan's statement is correct. I did not express my question clearly. What I want is polynomials only containing all subsets of the set of given variables (including the whole set itself, but without empty subset). So, take your example, > L:=[a+b+c,x+ab+d^3,y+c,a+b,a+b+c*d]; 3 L := [a + b + c, x + ab + d , y + c, a + b, a + b + c d] > select(f->indets(f)={a,b,c}, L); ---------------------------------->not. not including ALL subsets. [a + b + c] > select(f->(indets(f) minus {a,b,c})={}, L);---------------------->is what I want. [a + b + c, a + b] > select(f->({a,b,c} minus indets(f))={}, L);----------------------->not, because "d" is included. [a + b + c, a + b + c d] Thanks so much. Gepo

## thanks, both methods...

thanks, both methods work. But I think the first method is more flexible, because I can increase or decrease any number variables. select(f->indets(f)={a,b,c}, L);

## For Robert's reply, I did...

For Robert's reply, I did get why "cnt" makes the order of entries of list "essentially random".

## For Robert's reply, I did...

For Robert's reply, I did get why "cnt" makes the order of entries of list "essentially random".

## it works. I have no idea why...

Mohsen's method works. I have no idea why I put that extra line:) thanks a lot. Gepo

## it works. I have no idea why...

Mohsen's method works. I have no idea why I put that extra line:) thanks a lot. Gepo
 Page 1 of 1
﻿