Why Maple gives

           improper op or subscript selector

On this ode? I was not expecting to see steps for this, but was just trying to see what it will show.

Download internal_error_ODEsteps_sept_26_2024.mw

I thought I had post with collection showing timelimit still hangs in Maple. But can't find it searching. I wanted to add this to it.

If someone finds such post, please let me know and I will append this to that post and delete this.

I just found another example where int() hangs all of Maple, using timelimit. I put timelimit of 30 seconds. After 2 hrs it is still running.

Maple 2024.1 on windows 10. This shows clearly that timelimit in Maple still does not work when It was supposed to have been fixed in Maple 2021?

For me, if there is anything that will make me stop using Maple for good, it is this timelimit issue.

Because with timelimit not working all the time, my program keeps hanging. It is not possible to do antything then. Having to keep checking if the program is still running or have hanged and restarting it is not a way to develop software.

Software that have been in development for almost 45 years now like Maple, should have figured by now how to implement timelimit that works. 

Note that, with smaller timelimit it is possible it will  not hang, because longer time limit makes it end in the code path which causes the hang. When I tried 5 seconds for example instead of 30 second, it did not hang With 30 it does. so if you try it and it does not hang, please increase the timelimit a little and it will surely hang. Just make sure to do restart each time, since Maple remembers last result.

maple's server.exe was running at full cpu also.

Download int_hangs_with_timelimit.mw

Update OCT 10, 2024

This is another example showing hang in Maple 2024.1 using timelimit. So adding it to this collection. I had large collection of such problems but not able to find it now.

I was trying to verify this solution (which could very well be wrong) on ode with IC. timelimit hangs when I added assumptions as shown. Used 10,20,30 seconds, and so on. all hang. Waited and waited. 

Does it hang on other systems? I am using Windows 10 and Maple 2024.1 with 128 GB RAM on fast CPU.

Download time_limit_hang_example_oct_10_2024.mw

I would like to officially offer $1,000 prize for any one who can solve the timelimit hanging problem in Maple. Will send you personal check of this amount if you find why it hangs and provide fix to use that I can verify works.

Bernoulli first order ode has form as show in wikipedia  and also on Maple own site as

Notice that it is P(x)*y above and not P(x)* y^(-1) so the y(x) must be linear in that term.   But when I give Maple this ode

ode:=diff(y(x),x) + x*y(x)^(-1)= y(x)^(-1);

Which is clearly not of the form above, it solves it as Bernoulli.  In the above ode, P(x) is x and Q(x) is 1 and n is -1.

The ode advisor correctly said it is separable. But trace shows it used Bernoulli. Also when asking it to solve it as Bernoulli, it does.

What Am I missing here?  Is it not wrong for Maple to use Bernoulli method on this ode which is not Bernoulli?

Worksheet below

Download why_this_ode_bernullli_sept_15_2024.mw

I wanted to change  eq:= 1/2 * sqrt(-2*lambda)  to 1/2 %* sqrt(-2*lambda)  using a rule.

It works outside of rule ofcourse. But when I put %* in the RHS of the rule, maple hangs. It seems it is going into infinite loop.

I tried the trick of using '%*' but this gives syntax error.

Same problem happens when using %. and not just %*

Is there a workaround?

Attached worksheet. Make sure to save all work before trying it.
 

Download maples_hangs_applyrule_sept_10_2024.mw

This is an excersise in one of Mathematica's tutorials. The problem is to find from all persumtations of [1,2,3,4] those lists which has 2 in them before 3.

But the idea is that 2 can be anywhere before the 3, with possibly zero or more numbers between.

Will show how to do this in that other software, and ask if there is a way using Maple pattern matching or better way to do this in Maple better than what I did.

L=Permutations[{1,2,3,4}]
Cases[L,{___,2,___,3,___}]

gives

{{1, 2, 3, 4}, {1, 2, 4, 3}, {1, 4, 2, 3}, {2, 1, 3, 4}, 
{2, 1, 4,  3}, {2, 3, 1, 4}, {2, 3, 4, 1}, {2, 4, 1, 3}, 
{2, 4, 3, 1}, {4, 1,  2, 3}, {4, 2, 1, 3}, {4, 2, 3, 1}}

We see in all of the above, 2 is before 3.

In that other software, the ___ means there is zero or more things.  I could not find how to do this in Maple's pattern matching. So had to use has and then find the index of 2 and 3 in each list and check if the index of 2 is smaller than the index of 3. Which is kinda awakard and not as elegent as using a pattern, but it gives same result.

L:=combinat:-permute([1,2,3,4]);
map(X->`if`(has(X,2) and has(X,3) and ListTools:-Search(2,X)<ListTools:-Search(3,X),X,NULL) ,L);

Gives

[[1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 4, 3], [1, 4, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3, 4], 
[2, 1, 4, 3], [2, 3, 1, 4], [2, 3, 4, 1], [2, 4, 1, 3], 
[2, 4, 3, 1], [4, 1, 2, 3], [4, 2, 1, 3], [4, 2, 3, 1]]

Can you suggest a way using either patmatch or applyrules in Maple to do the same?  

Could this be done easier than what I did using evalindents without the need for pattern?

I find patterns easier to work with myself.

ps. converting each list to string, and then using regular expression or string matching, is not what I am looking for. 

ps. the check in Maple code of has(X,2) and has(X,3) is not really needed here, since we know each list will have 2 and 3 in them. But I kept these to make it more general for other type of problems where these extra checks might be needed.