Maple 15 Questions and Posts Maple 15 Questions and Posts Feed

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple 15

Plz help me friends ...

I gave this function ...


i wanna extract coeffitions from this function ... for example what is the coeffition of phi(X)*psi(x)?

i used coeff ... but it had an error ..

unable compute coeff ...

i used collect ... but it had an error

what am i doing with this problem?





Is it possible to use Maple 15 Student Edition with the same license information and purchase code both on Windows and Ubuntu?

I did a few Windows reinstalls (guess about 3) hence I used the same purchase code to activate the license that many times. Today I tried installing and using Maple 15 on Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS 32-bit and to my dismay the license manager said, "Not enough activations left on this account." Furthermore, I have exhausted my download links and would like to know how many times Maple 15 can be activated and if the download links can be refreshed?



I am trying to get a Fourier transform of a Gaussian:

so I say

and get

The Fouriertransform of a Gaussian is well known and the result I expect is something like


ignoring normalizations & other factors. I know that I can add functions to inttrans, but I kind-of expected inttrans[fourier] to know how to transform a Gaussian, it is a commonly used transformation. Even if I set phi0 to 0 it does not produce anything useful.


Mac Dude

Hi all

I dont know why some Z1 appears on the screen and the code does not converge.
please help me
thanks alooooot




H1:= p*(diff(f(tau),tau$3)+((3/5)*f(tau)*diff(f(tau),tau$2))-(1/5)*(diff(f(tau),tau$1))^2+((2/5)*tau*diff(h(tau),tau$1))-((2/5)*h(tau))-BB*diff(f(tau),tau$1))+(1-p)*(diff(f(tau),tau$3)):
H11:= p*((1/pr)*diff(h(tau),tau$3)+(3/5)*f(tau)*diff(h(tau),tau$2))+(1-p)*(diff(h(tau),tau$3)):
convert(series(collect(expand(eq2), p), p, n+1), 'polynom');
convert(series(collect(expand(eq22), p), p, n+1), 'polynom');
for i to n do
s[i] := coeff(eq4, p^i) ;
print (i);
end do:
for i to nn do
ss[i] := coeff(eq44, p^i) ;
print (i);
end do:
s[0]:=diff(f[0](tau), tau$3);
ss[0]:=diff(h[0](tau), tau$3);
ics[0]:=f[0](0)=0, D(f[0])(0)=0, D(f[0])(BINF)=0;
icss[0]:=h[0](BINF)=0, D(h[0])(0)=1, D(h[0])(BINF)=0;

dsolve({s[0], ics[0]});
f[0](tau):= rhs(%);
#dsolve({ss[0], icss[0]});
h[0](tau):= -exp(-tau); #;rhs(%);

for i to n do
f[ii-1](tau):=convert(series(f[ii-1](tau), tau, nn+1), 'polynom');
h[ii-1](tau):=convert(series(h[ii-1](tau), tau, nn+1), 'polynom');
ics[i]:=f[i](0)=0, D(f[i])(0)=0, D(f[i])(BINF)=0;
dsolve({s[i], ics[i]});
icss[i]:=h[i](BINF)=0, D(h[i])(0)=0, D(h[i])(BINF)=0;
dsolve({ss[i], icss[i]});

end do;



plot(pade(diff(f(tau),tau), tau, [7, 7]),tau=0..5,color=blue,style=point,symbol=circle,symbolsize=7,labels=["tau","velocity"]);



I am using "Maple 15" and "Windows 7" and I want to share the tip for using "Classic worksheet" and "GR Tensor". Windows 7 is 64-bit but you can use Classic worksheet and GR Tensor, which work basically in 32-bit, by simply downlording "32-bit Maple 15" !! I haven't tried other more current versions of Maple but Maple 15 works well: you can choose 32-bit Maple in the download options.

Enjoy the Classic worksheet and GR Tensor. Good luck !  


I have a problem with the last dsolve in the following code. I am asking it again since nobody answerd me.

The last dsolve in the code " dsolve({ss[ii], icss[ii]}); " connot integrate theta[1] twice and some "Z1" apears on the screen !BUT when I integrate theta [1] seprately, maple gives the best answer but it does not work in this code !
please help me

B := 1+(2*(1-zzeta))*Br*(int(tau*(diff(u(tau), tau))^2, tau = (1/2)*zzeta*(1-zzeta) .. 1/2*(1-zzeta)));
eq4 := 4*B*u(tau)-(1+zzeta)*(diff(tau*(diff(theta(tau), tau)), tau))/tau-(1+zzeta)*Br*(diff(u(tau), tau))^2;

HH:= p*((4*(1+(2*(1-zzeta))*Br*(int(tau*(diff(u(tau), tau))^2, tau = (1/2)*zzeta*(1-zzeta) .. 1/2-(1/2)*zzeta))))*u(tau)-(1+zzeta)*(diff(theta(tau), tau)+tau*(diff(theta(tau), tau, tau)))/tau-(1+zzeta)*Br*(diff(u(tau), tau))^2)+(1-p)*(diff(theta(tau),tau$2)):

convert(series(collect(expand(eq5), p), p, nn+1), 'polynom');

for ii to nn do
ss[ii] := (coeff(eq7, p^ii)) ;
print (ii);
end do;

ss[0]:=diff(theta[0](tau), tau, tau);

icss[0]:=theta[0](zzeta/(2*(1-zzeta)))=0, D(theta[0])(1/(2*(1-zzeta)))=1;

dsolve({ss[0], icss[0]});
theta[0](tau):= rhs(%);

for ii to nn do
icss[ii]:=theta[ii](zzeta/(2*(1-zzeta)))=0, D(theta[ii])(1/(2*(1-zzeta)))=0;
dsolve({ss[ii], icss[ii]});
end do;

I would be most grateful if you help me to find this problem.

Thanks for your attention in advance

I'm trying to display some flow lines for a vector field. The vector field I have is:

What I put into Maple is:

I've tried this with a number of points, but I always get an error message along the lines of:

"Error, (in Student:-VectorCalculus:-FlowLine) cannot determine if this expression is true or false: (2.*(1)(0)-4.)^2+(-2.+4.*(1)(0))^2 < 0.9e-9"

Could someone please shed some light as to what's going wrong for me? I would be very grateful for any help.


Hi there!

I wrote a piece of code which spits out the numerical datapoints (x,y(x)) corresponding to a function y(x). So that the result is accurate, I need quite a lot of data points - currently I am working with 5k.

In order to work with this function later, I interpolated it with a Spline. For instance, I would like to sample the function values on a fifferent grid, etc.. However the evaluation of this function really takes up hell of a lot of time, and the reason seems to be, that it, being a spline on 5k nodes, is simply a huge expression.

Is there a better way to do this? Are other fitting functions than a spline maybe better suited?

Thanks for help!


I need to get rid of the type "constant" for gamma. In Maple, gamma is defined as Euler's constant by default. While it is easy enough to unprotect(gamma) and then get rid of its value, Maple will refuse to solve an equation for gamma, as it remains of type constant even after deassigning it. So I need to regain gamma as a variable.

Some may feel this is an unwise thing to do. But it actually is not: I am writing a document involving physics, and gamma is the accepted symbol for the relativistic energy. I cannot avoid using that, lest mass confusion ensues (this involves students). I really don't want to write gammar instead. Euler's constant, otoh, does not figure at all in my document.

Note that I need a solution that works in Maple 15 and later as I am working in a heterogeneous environment as far as Maple versions are concerned.

Thanks in advance,

Mac Dude


i have got alot of mixed and high degree derivatives. For example:

u[x]*u[x,t]*eta[x,t]+u[]^2*u[x]*eta[x]+kis(x,y)u[x,t]^2*u[]+eta(x, y)*u[]*u[x]^2+ksi[x,t]*u[x]^2*u[x,t]+......

like this alot of terms

my question is how can i solve divided by the derivative of the u(x,t) partial differential equations system and so  how can i find eta(x,t,u) and ksi(x,t,u) 

I have the following expression (obtained from an earlier calculation):

I want to collect all the terms under one summation. So I define a rule:

end proc:

and then


I get

Error, (in +) unable to identify A::algebraic

I used similar constructs before so I think the rule is constructed correctly. I should, however, mention that I use the Physics:-Vectors package and in fact the expression I start up with here reads, in 1-d Maple inputform:

Physics[Vectors][`+`](Physics[Vectors][`+`](Physics[Vectors][`+`](-y*(Sum((diff(a[n](r), r))/(exp(I*Pi*n/L))^2, n))/r, (2*I)*(Sum(a[n](r)/(exp(I*Pi*n/L))^2, n))*k0), y*(Sum(a[n](r)/(exp(I*Pi*n/L))^2, n))*k0^2), -y*(Sum((diff(a[n](r), r, r))/(exp(I*Pi*n/L))^2, n)))

Is my problem related to the use of Physics:-Vectors? If so, how can I get around that?


Mac Dude

Hi everyone

I'd be pleased if you could give a hand with the exploration assistant.


1. I want the exploration assistant to appear on the same document I am working on, but everytime I use it (either by right-clicking or by the explore command) it automatically appears on a new document.


2. can I manipulate a piecewise function when using embedded components? i.e.: plot the function and varying the parameters using sliders.




a error and code in this attachment mw

i can pdsolve it, but numeric pdsolve it get error

I have this kind of problem. When I try to solve my command:


is there any way to avoid this? in order to get the answer directly...

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Last Page 7 of 43